Suppr超能文献

如果人工尿括约肌不可行怎么办?吊带治疗根治性前列腺切除术后持续性压力性尿失禁患者中 ProACT 的可行性和有效性。

What if artificial urinary sphincter is not possible? Feasibility and effectiveness of ProACT for patients with persistent stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy treated by sling.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg, France.

Department of Urology, Hospital Universitaire Carémeau de Nimes, 4 rue du Professeur Debré, Nimes, France.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Jun;39(5):1417-1422. doi: 10.1002/nau.24355. Epub 2020 Apr 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a major component of the post radical prostatectomy (RP) trifecta. Surgical treatments are sub-urethral slings, artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and adjustable peri-urethral balloons (PUB) ProACT. All options are imperfect at best and persistent SUI is challenging when AUS is not manageable.

AIMS

This study analyzed the cumulate experience of our 2 centers with offering PUB implantation for SUI post RP in patients with insufficient improvement from slings.

MATERIALS & METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed all patients implanted with second line ProACT. The primary endpoint was continence, defined as 0 pads per day (PPD). The secondary endpoints were 50% decrease in PPD and increases in the Incontinence Quality of Life score (IQOL). Refilling and complications were reported.

RESULTS

Between 2007 and 2016, 26 patients were implanted. Five patients have had adjuvant radiotherapy (18%). The mean follow-up was 36 months (±20; min 14-max 128). All patient presented with persistent SUI, using 2.3 PPD (±1; min 1-max 6), and only one sling was removed due to infection. After ProACT with an average 3 mL refilling (±1.2 min 2-max 6), 18 patients (66.7%) were continent. Eight of the remaining patients (29.6%) were improved; their number of PPD decreased from 2.6 to 1. The average IQOL score of those 8 patients increased by 20 points, from 53.4 up to 74.2 (P = .005). Overall 26 patients (96.3%) were improved. The remaining patient was not implanted because of an intraoperative urethral injury and is considered a failed case (3.7%). He had instead an AUS implantation. Three patients (14.8%) needed PUB replacement.

CONCLUSION

The limited population of patients from both our centers who presented with persistent SUI after RP, despite sling placement, improved with PUB ProACT implantations without significant complications.

摘要

背景

压力性尿失禁(SUI)是根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后三联征的主要组成部分。手术治疗方法是尿道下吊带、人工尿道括约肌(AUS)和可调节尿道周围球囊(PUB)ProACT。所有的选择都不完美,当 AUS 无法控制时,持续性 SUI 是一个挑战。

目的

本研究分析了我们 2 个中心对接受过吊带治疗但仍有持续性 SUI 的 RP 后患者实施 PUB 植入治疗的经验。

材料与方法

本回顾性研究分析了所有接受二线 ProACT 植入的患者。主要终点是控尿,定义为每天 0 片尿垫(PPD)。次要终点是 PPD 减少 50%和尿失禁生活质量评分(IQOL)增加。报告了再填充和并发症。

结果

2007 年至 2016 年间,共植入 26 例患者。其中 5 例(18%)接受了辅助放疗。平均随访时间为 36 个月(±20;最小 14 最大 128)。所有患者均存在持续性 SUI,使用 2.3 片尿垫(±1;最小 1 最大 6),仅有 1 例因感染而取出吊带。在 ProACT 治疗后,平均填充 3 毫升(±1.2 最小 2 最大 6),18 例患者(66.7%)控尿。其余 8 例患者(29.6%)得到改善;他们的 PPD 从 2.6 片减少到 1 片。这 8 例患者的平均 IQOL 评分提高了 20 分,从 53.4 分提高到 74.2 分(P = .005)。总的来说,26 例患者(96.3%)得到改善。另一位患者因术中尿道损伤未接受植入治疗,被认为是失败病例(3.7%)。他随后植入了 AUS。3 例患者(14.8%)需要更换 PUB。

结论

我们 2 个中心的患者在接受 RP 后出现持续性 SUI,尽管接受了吊带治疗,但通过 PUB ProACT 植入治疗后,大多数患者的病情得到改善,且没有出现明显的并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验