Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia.
School of Science and Mathematics, Avondale University College, PO Box 19, Cooranbong, NSW 2265, Australia.
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jul 1;724:138115. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138115. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
Worldwide, spoil from maintenance dredging of navigation channels is increasingly used to opportunistically nourish beaches. This is often justified on the presumption that nourishment will improve public beach amenity and restore sandy beach habitat. However, this is not necessarily the case, especially for beaches that do not have an immediate threat of significant erosion. We addressed the ecological impacts and benefits of a backshore sand nourishment project conducted along an off-road vehicle (ORV) damaged section of Blacksmiths Beach, New South Wales, Australia. Sediment, sourced from dredging the inlet of nearby Lake Macquarie, was placed on the foredune, ORVs were excluded and low-density vegetation was planted. Sampling before and after the management interventions, at the Impact (nourished) site, two Control sites (with ORVs), and two Reference sites (without ORVs), assessed ecological impacts of nourishment and the efficacy of the interventions in rehabilitating vegetation and invertebrate communities degraded by ORVs. Nourishment initially had large negative impacts on vegetation cover, as well as on invertebrate abundance and richness. Recovery to a pre-nourished state was, however, observed for vegetation cover after 9 months and invertebrate communities after 21 months. Nevertheless, by the end of our study that extended 21 months post-nourishment and ORV exclusion, there was no evidence of change in the nourished site towards the state of Reference sites. Overall, our study suggests that small-scale backshore sand nourishments of ocean beaches may have only short-term negative impacts on foredune ecosystems when accompanied with some replanting. Nevertheless, where the frequency of sand disposals is greater than the required recovery time, or cumulative effects amass, longer-term or sustained impacts may occur. Our study does not support the efficacy of sand nourishment as a tool for ecological restoration, at least in the short term, without sustained replanting and weeding efforts aimed at reinstating the vegetation community.
在全球范围内,航道维护疏浚产生的泥沙越来越多地被用于填海造地。这种做法通常是基于这样的假设,即填海造地将改善公共海滩的舒适度,并恢复沙滩生境。然而,情况并非总是如此,尤其是对于那些没有受到严重侵蚀威胁的海滩。我们研究了澳大利亚新南威尔士州布莱克史密斯海滩一段越野车受损区域进行的后滨沙滩补沙工程的生态影响和效益。从附近麦夸里湖的入海口疏浚而来的泥沙被放置在前滨沙丘上,禁止越野车进入,并种植了低密度植被。在管理干预前后,在受影响(补沙)点、两个对照点(有越野车)和两个参照点(无越野车)进行采样,评估了补沙对植被和受越野车破坏的无脊椎动物群落的生态影响,以及这些干预措施在恢复植被和无脊椎动物群落方面的效果。补沙最初对植被覆盖度以及无脊椎动物的丰度和丰富度产生了巨大的负面影响。然而,在 9 个月后观察到植被覆盖度恢复到补沙前的状态,在 21 个月后观察到无脊椎动物群落的恢复。尽管如此,在我们的研究结束时,即补沙和禁止越野车进入 21 个月后,受补沙点仍没有朝着参照点状态转变的迹象。总的来说,我们的研究表明,当小型后滨沙滩补沙伴随着一些重新种植时,可能只会对前滨沙丘生态系统产生短期的负面影响。然而,如果沙滩处置的频率超过所需的恢复时间,或者累积效应增加,可能会出现长期或持续的影响。我们的研究不支持沙滩补沙作为生态恢复工具的有效性,至少在短期内,如果没有持续的重新种植和除草工作,以恢复植被群落,是没有效果的。