Clin Lab. 2020 Apr 1;66(4). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2019.190820.
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of the immunosuppressant mycophenolic acid (MPA) is especially recommended for the control of personalized immunosuppressive therapy. Various test systems are available for MPA monitoring, including high performance liquid chromatography combined with UV detection (HPLC-UV) and isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (ID-LC-MS/MS).
In the present work, commercially available kits for MPA monitoring with HPLC-UV and ID-LC-MS/ MS were subjected to routine use TDM. Following method verification according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, 105 native sample duplicates from patients under therapy with mycophenolate mofetil were assayed with both procedures for comparative testing.
Using bi-level quality controls, the estimate of repeatability, within-laboratory imprecision and inaccuracy were ≤ 5.18%, ≤ 5.95% and ≤ 3.86% for all MPA measurements. Weighted Deming regression analysis yielded a slope of 0.93, an intercept of 0.04, and Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) of 0.99, while Bland-Altman analysis showed a combined relative bias of 4.93% (± 1.96 SD: -16.68 - 26.54%). Plasma samples taken from a patient re-peatedly showed the presence of an interferent only in HPLC-UV analysis.
Based on these results, HPLC-UV testing can be considered suitable for routine TDM of MPA in the clinical setting with high precision. Due to the risk of unforeseen analytical interference in ever-increasing multimorbidity and polypharmacy, highly selective ID-LC-MS/MS methodology should be given preference over HPLC-UV analysis whenever feasible.
治疗药物监测(TDM)对于免疫抑制剂麦考酚酸(MPA)的控制尤其推荐用于个性化免疫抑制治疗。目前有多种检测系统可用于MPA 监测,包括高效液相色谱结合紫外检测(HPLC-UV)和同位素稀释液相色谱串联质谱法(ID-LC-MS/MS)。
本研究采用 HPLC-UV 和 ID-LC-MS/MS 商业试剂盒进行常规 TDM。根据临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)指南进行方法验证后,用两种方法检测 105 例正在接受麦考酚酸酯治疗的患者的原始样本重复样本,进行对比测试。
使用双水平质控品,两种方法的重复性估计值、实验室内部不精密度和不准确度均≤5.18%、≤5.95%和≤3.86%。加权 Deming 回归分析得到斜率为 0.93,截距为 0.04,Pearson 相关系数(r)为 0.99,Bland-Altman 分析显示总相对偏差为 4.93%(±1.96 SD:-16.68-26.54%)。从一位患者的血浆样本中反复发现,只有 HPLC-UV 分析中存在干扰物。
基于这些结果,HPLC-UV 检测可被认为适合于临床环境中 MPA 的常规 TDM,具有较高的精密度。由于在不断增加的多种合并症和多种药物治疗中存在不可预见的分析干扰风险,只要可行,应优先选择高度选择性的 ID-LC-MS/MS 方法,而不是 HPLC-UV 分析。