• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择偶模仿:现状与发展方向。

Mate-choice copying: Status quo and where to go.

作者信息

Witte Klaudia, Kniel Nina, Kureck Ilka Maria

机构信息

Research Group of Ecology and Behavioral Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Siegen, 57068 Siegen, Germany.

出版信息

Curr Zool. 2015 Dec;61(6):1073-1081. doi: 10.1093/czoolo/61.6.1073. Epub 2015 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1093/czoolo/61.6.1073
PMID:32256543
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7098685/
Abstract

Mate-choice copying is a fascinating and widespread mate-choice strategy. Individuals gather public information about potential mates by observing others during sexual interactions and choose or reject the same individual as a mate as the observed individual did before. The influence of copying behavior on an individual's mate choice can be so strong that socially acquired information can override genetically based preferences for certain phenotypes. Thus, mate-choice copying enforces dynamic processes in sexual selection. Here, we review the current state of research on mate-choice copying and focus on sex-specific aspects. We present evidence that mate-choice copying can support the evolution of novel sexual ornaments, and we discuss potential costs of mate-choice copying when public information is not reliable. Moreover, we discuss the conflict faced by males that copy since mate-choice copying increases sperm competition. In conclusion we suggest interesting topics for future research in mate-choice copying.

摘要

择偶模仿是一种引人入胜且广泛存在的择偶策略。个体通过在性互动过程中观察他人来收集有关潜在配偶的公共信息,并像之前观察到的个体那样选择或拒绝同一个体作为配偶。模仿行为对个体择偶的影响可能非常强烈,以至于通过社会获得的信息可以超越基于基因的对某些表型的偏好。因此,择偶模仿在性选择中推动了动态过程。在此,我们回顾择偶模仿的当前研究现状,并关注性别特异性方面。我们提供证据表明择偶模仿可以支持新的性装饰的进化,并且我们讨论当公共信息不可靠时择偶模仿的潜在成本。此外,我们讨论了进行模仿的雄性所面临的冲突,因为择偶模仿会增加精子竞争。总之,我们提出了择偶模仿未来研究的有趣主题。

相似文献

1
Mate-choice copying: Status quo and where to go.择偶模仿:现状与发展方向。
Curr Zool. 2015 Dec;61(6):1073-1081. doi: 10.1093/czoolo/61.6.1073. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
2
Sex and the public: Social eavesdropping, sperm competition risk and male mate choice.性别与公众:社会窃听、精子竞争风险与雄性配偶选择
Commun Integr Biol. 2011 May;4(3):276-80. doi: 10.4161/cib.4.3.14916.
3
Test of the Deception Hypothesis in Atlantic Mollies -Does the Audience Copy a Pretended Mate Choice of Others?大西洋鳉鱼欺骗假说的测试——观众会模仿他人假装的配偶选择吗?
Biology (Basel). 2018 Jul 13;7(3):40. doi: 10.3390/biology7030040.
4
Quality of public information matters in mate-choice copying in female zebra finches.公共信息质量在雌性斑胸草雀的择偶模仿中至关重要。
Front Zool. 2015 Oct 1;12:26. doi: 10.1186/s12983-015-0119-8. eCollection 2015.
5
Misleading mollies: The effect of an audience on the expression of mating preferences.误导性的摩利鱼:观众对交配偏好表达的影响。
Commun Integr Biol. 2008;1(2):199-203. doi: 10.4161/cib.1.2.7199.
6
Mate-choice copying, social information processing, and the roles of oxytocin.伴侣选择模仿、社会信息处理和催产素的作用。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Jan;72:232-242. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
7
Mate Choice Copying in Humans.人类中的择偶模仿
Hum Nat. 2007 Sep;18(3):264-71. doi: 10.1007/s12110-007-9004-2.
8
The role of mate-choice copying in speciation and hybridization.配偶选择复制在物种形成和杂交中的作用。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 May;93(2):1304-1322. doi: 10.1111/brv.12397. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
9
The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.昆虫中雄性配偶选择的进化:观点与证据的综合
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001 Aug;76(3):305-39. doi: 10.1017/s1464793101005693.
10
Audience effects in the Atlantic molly (Poecilia mexicana)-prudent male mate choice in response to perceived sperm competition risk?大西洋斜带鲷(Poecilia mexicana)的观众效应——雄性审慎择偶以应对感知到的精子竞争风险?
Front Zool. 2009 Aug 21;6:17. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-6-17.

引用本文的文献

1
Fear of mating out (FOMO): voyeurism does not increase mating propensity in fruit flies.避免与外群交配的恐惧(FOMO):偷窥行为不会增加果蝇的交配倾向。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):31916. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83465-6.
2
Mate-choice copying accelerates species range expansion.配偶选择模仿能加速物种的扩散。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Aug;291(2029):20241201. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1201. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
3
Tympanal ears mediate male-male competition, courtship and mating success in butterflies.鼓膜耳在蝴蝶的雄雄竞争、求偶和交配成功中发挥作用。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Mar 27;11(3):231386. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231386. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
The importance of population heterogeneities in detecting social learning as the foundation of animal cultural transmission.人口异质性在检测作为动物文化传播基础的社会学习中的重要性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Jun 8;289(1976):20220431. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0431. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
5
Male black widows parasitize mate-searching effort of rivals to find females faster.雄性黑寡妇通过寄生在寻找配偶的竞争对手身上,从而更快地找到雌性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Aug 14;286(1908):20191470. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1470. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
6
Effect of early experience on neuronal and behavioral responses to con- and heterospecific odors in closely related Mus taxa: epigenetic contribution in formation of precopulatory isolation.早期经验对密切相关的 Mus 分类单元中同种和异种气味的神经元和行为反应的影响:交配前隔离形成中的表观遗传贡献。
BMC Evol Biol. 2019 Feb 26;19(Suppl 1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12862-019-1373-8.
7
Male mate choice in livebearing fishes: an overview.卵胎生硬骨鱼中的雄性配偶选择:综述
Curr Zool. 2018 Jun;64(3):393-403. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoy028. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
8
Effects of a sex ratio gradient on female mate-copying and choosiness in .性别比例梯度对……中雌性配偶模仿和择偶偏好的影响 。 (你提供的原文似乎不完整,最后的“in.”后面应该还有具体内容)
Curr Zool. 2018 Apr;64(2):251-258. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoy014. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
9
Test of the Deception Hypothesis in Atlantic Mollies -Does the Audience Copy a Pretended Mate Choice of Others?大西洋鳉鱼欺骗假说的测试——观众会模仿他人假装的配偶选择吗?
Biology (Basel). 2018 Jul 13;7(3):40. doi: 10.3390/biology7030040.
10
Commentary: The neural basis of human female mate copying: An empathy-based social learning process.评论:人类女性模仿配偶行为的神经基础:基于共情的社会学习过程。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 23;9:397. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00397. eCollection 2018.