Suppr超能文献

脊柱外科医生可以做些什么来改善患者护理并避免医疗过失诉讼?

What Can Spine Surgeons Do to Improve Patient Care and Avoid Medical Negligence Suits?

作者信息

Epstein Nancy E

机构信息

Professor of Clinical Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York, United States.

出版信息

Surg Neurol Int. 2020 Mar 6;11:38. doi: 10.25259/SNI_28_2020. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Why do patients sue following spine surgery? Here we reviewed some of the most frequent reasons for medical negligence suits against surgeons, adjunctive medical personnel, and or institutions/hospitals.

METHODS

Summarizing the multiple reasons for suits against spine surgeons, their colleagues/consultants, and hospitals should help surgeons identify the problems leading to suits, and improve patient care.

RESULTS

Several of the most common reasons for medical negligence suits include: lack of informed consent, ghost surgery, failure to diagnose and treat (e.g. including preoperative, perioperative, and post-surgical complications), performing unnecessarily risky, excessive and/or unnecessary surgery; failure to provide adequate postoperative care; absent or inadequate intraoperative neural physiological monitoring; and spoliation (e.g. fraudulent surgical, office, and/or hospital notes/records).

CONCLUSIONS

There are many reasons why patients sue their spine surgeons. Being aware of the factors that lead to suits, spine surgeons should learn to provide better preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care, and, thus, limit perioperative morbidity and mortality.

摘要

背景

为什么患者在脊柱手术后会提起诉讼?在此,我们回顾了针对外科医生、辅助医疗人员以及机构/医院提起医疗过失诉讼的一些最常见原因。

方法

总结针对脊柱外科医生、其同事/会诊医生以及医院提起诉讼的多种原因,应有助于外科医生识别导致诉讼的问题,并改善患者护理。

结果

医疗过失诉讼的一些最常见原因包括:缺乏知情同意、冒名手术、未能诊断和治疗(例如包括术前、围手术期和术后并发症)、进行不必要的高风险、过度和/或不必要的手术;未能提供充分的术后护理;术中神经生理监测缺失或不足;以及篡改(例如伪造手术、办公室和/或医院记录)。

结论

患者起诉脊柱外科医生有很多原因。脊柱外科医生意识到导致诉讼的因素后,应学会提供更好的术前、术中和术后护理,从而降低围手术期发病率和死亡率。

相似文献

1
What Can Spine Surgeons Do to Improve Patient Care and Avoid Medical Negligence Suits?
Surg Neurol Int. 2020 Mar 6;11:38. doi: 10.25259/SNI_28_2020. eCollection 2020.
2
Why are spine surgeons sued, and with what outcomes?
Surg Neurol Int. 2023 Feb 10;14:46. doi: 10.25259/SNI_1172_2022. eCollection 2023.
3
The medicolegal landscape of spine surgery: how do surgeons fare?
Spine J. 2018 Feb;18(2):209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.038. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
4
Medical malpractice and facial nerve paralysis.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Jan;129(1):50-3. doi: 10.1001/archotol.129.1.50.
6
Failed consent in spinal surgery again. Minimum standards for consent must be adopted by all surgeons.
Br J Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;35(4):467-469. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1866746. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
7
Medical malpractice and hernia repair: an analysis of case law.
J Surg Res. 2013 Apr;180(2):196-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.04.028. Epub 2012 May 4.
8
Physician and patients factors associated with outcome of spinal epidural abscess related malpractice litigation.
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2018 Sep 26;10(3):7693. doi: 10.4081/or.2018.7693. eCollection 2018 Sep 5.
9
Litigation suits in otorhinolaryngology - Areas of concern.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Oct;58(4):370-3. doi: 10.1007/BF03049598.
10
It is easier to confuse a jury than convince a judge: the crisis in medical malpractice.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 15;27(22):2425-30. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00002.

引用本文的文献

1
From error to prevention of wrong-level spine surgery: a review.
Patient Saf Surg. 2025 May 15;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13037-025-00440-4.
2
Medical negligence in healthcare organizations and its impact on patient safety and public health: a bibliometric study.
F1000Res. 2021 Mar 3;10:174. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.37448.1. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Ghost Surgery, Including Neurosurgery and Other Surgical Subspecialties.
Surg Neurol Int. 2019 Aug 9;10:157. doi: 10.25259/SNI_421_2019. eCollection 2019.
2
Learning curves for minimally invasive spine surgeries: Are they worth it?
Surg Neurol Int. 2017 Apr 26;8:61. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_39_17. eCollection 2017.
3
Commentary on: The role of surgery for treatment of low back pain: Insights from the randomized controlled SPORT trials.
Surg Neurol Int. 2016 Sep 22;7(Suppl 25):S648-S651. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.191069. eCollection 2016.
4
The need to add motor evoked potential monitoring to somatosensory and electromyographic monitoring in cervical spine surgery.
Surg Neurol Int. 2013 Oct 29;4(Suppl 5):S383-91. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.120782. eCollection 2013.
5
Are recommended spine operations either unnecessary or too complex? Evidence from second opinions.
Surg Neurol Int. 2013 Oct 29;4(Suppl 5):S353-8. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.120774. eCollection 2013.
6
A review of medicolegal malpractice suits involving cervical spine: what can we learn or change?
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Feb;24(1):15-9. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181c752ab.
8
X-Stop: foot drop.
Spine J. 2009 May;9(5):e6-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.08.004. Epub 2008 Sep 21.
9
How often is minimally invasive minimally effective: what are the complication rates for minimally invasive surgery?
Surg Neurol. 2008 Oct;70(4):386-8; discussion 389. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2007.08.013. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
10
It is easier to confuse a jury than convince a judge: the crisis in medical malpractice.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 15;27(22):2425-30. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00002.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验