Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Arthroscopy. 2020 Aug;36(8):2047-2054. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.03.028. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
To compare the biomechanical characteristics of the interconnected knotless anchor (IKA) fixation with the double knotless anchor (DKA) and interference screw (IS) fixation in the suprapectoral biceps tenodesis.
In total, 24 fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders (mean age, 67.3 ± 6 years) were used for the study. All the specimens were randomly divided into 3 experimental biceps tenodesis groups (n = 8): IKA, DKA, and IS. After tenodesis, each specimen was preloaded at 5 N for 2 minutes, followed by a cyclic loading test from 5 to 70 N for 500 load cycles. Finally, a destructive axial load to failure test (1 mm/s) was performed. All the values, including ultimate failure load, stiffness, cyclic displacement, and mode of failure were evaluated.
The IKA provided the highest construct stiffness (38.9 ± 7.7 N/mm) and ultimate failure load (288.3 ± 47.6 N), the results for which were statistically better than the corresponding results in the IS and DKA groups. In terms of cyclic displacement, there were no statistical differences among the 3 fixation constructs. The most common failure mode was biceps tendon tearing in IS group (7/8) and IKA group (8/8). In the contrast, suture slippage accounted for the most common failure mode in DKA.
In suprapectoral bicep tenodesis, IKA fixation appears to offer improved construct stiffness and ultimate failure load while maintaining comparable suture slippage as compared with IS fixation or DKA fixation in the current biomechanical study.
The IKA fixation compares favorably with other techniques and could be an alternative clinical option for suprapectoral biceps tenodesis.
比较带线锚钉(IKA)固定、双带线锚钉(DKA)固定和界面螺钉(IS)固定在肩前侧肱二头肌肌腱固定术中的生物力学特性。
共使用 24 个新鲜冷冻的人体冰冻肩关节(平均年龄 67.3±6 岁)进行研究。所有标本均随机分为 3 个实验组(n=8):IKA、DKA 和 IS。肌腱固定后,每个标本先预加载 5 N 持续 2 分钟,然后进行 5 至 70 N 的循环加载测试 500 个循环。最后进行破坏性轴向失效测试(1mm/s)。评估所有值,包括最终失效负荷、刚度、循环位移和失效模式。
IKA 提供了最高的结构刚度(38.9±7.7 N/mm)和最终失效负荷(288.3±47.6 N),其结果明显优于 IS 和 DKA 组的相应结果。在循环位移方面,3 种固定结构之间无统计学差异。最常见的失效模式是 IS 组(7/8)和 IKA 组(8/8)的肱二头肌肌腱撕裂。相比之下,缝线滑脱是 DKA 组最常见的失效模式。
在肩前侧肱二头肌肌腱固定术中,IKA 固定在提供更好的结构刚度和最终失效负荷的同时,与 IS 固定或 DKA 固定相比,缝线滑脱的发生率相似。
IKA 固定术与其他技术相比具有优势,可能是肩前侧肱二头肌肌腱固定的一种替代临床选择。