Department of Communication.
Bronfenbrenner Center for Translational Research.
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jul;32(7):635-648. doi: 10.1037/pas0000821. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
Tools for assessing an individual's readiness to change nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) are limited. The Transtheoretical model of change (TTM) has been useful in predicting behavior change and guiding interventions for a variety of health behaviors including eating disorders, substance use disorders, and exercise. The aim of the current study was to examine the validity of test score interpretations from 3 newly developed measures to assess NSSI behavior change. Following in-depth interviews, modifications to existing TTM scales were made and tested with a set of web-based measures delivered to people who self-injure. This resulted in 11 new scales that reflect 3 domains associated with behavior change: NSSI-Decisional Balance (NSSI-DB), NSSI-Processes of Change (NSSI-POC), and NSSI-Self-Efficacy (NSSI-SE). Overall, results provide support for the reliability of test scores and validity of test scores interpretations. Implications for research, clinical use, and next steps are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
评估个体改变非自杀性自我伤害(NSSI)意愿的工具有限。改变的跨理论模型(TTM)在预测行为改变和指导各种健康行为的干预方面(包括饮食障碍、物质使用障碍和运动)非常有用。本研究的目的是检验 3 种新开发的用于评估 NSSI 行为改变的测量工具的测试分数解释的有效性。在深入访谈之后,对现有的 TTM 量表进行了修改,并与一套通过网络提供给自我伤害者的测量工具进行了测试。这产生了 11 个新的量表,反映了与行为改变相关的 3 个领域:NSSI-决策平衡(NSSI-DB)、NSSI-改变过程(NSSI-POC)和 NSSI-自我效能(NSSI-SE)。总的来说,结果支持测试分数的可靠性和测试分数解释的有效性。讨论了研究、临床应用和下一步的意义。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。