Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Aug;52(8):766-774. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.02.010. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
To assess changes in written local wellness policies (LWPs) across time within Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education (SNAP-Ed)-participating districts.
Sequential, explanatory mixed methods.
From October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016, SNAP-Ed agencies submitted LWPs from partner school districts in Arizona. They received back scores and customized recommendations. To assess changes, LWPs were rescored between October 1, 2017 and September 30, 2018.
Sixteen local SNAP-Ed agencies worked with 57 districts.
Districts' LWP revisions supported by SNAP-Ed agencies during the 2-year pre-post period.
Policy comprehensiveness and strength from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), measured by the Wellness School Assessment Tool.
Paired t test to compare pre-post scores. Content analysis of State Educational Agency administrative reviews and thematic analysis of SNAP-Ed narrative reports to explore causation.
Total scores increased (comprehensiveness: +12.4, P < .001, 95% confidence interval, 8.1-16.7; strength: +13.5, P < .001, 95% CI, 9.3-17.7). Improvements were also found for comprehensiveness by section, except Nutrition Education, and for strength across all sections. Qualitative findings suggest that SNAP-Ed interventions combined with state and federal influence contributed to the improvements.
Local wellness policies in SNAP-Ed-supported districts improved over time. State and federal LWP guidelines can work synergistically with SNAP-Ed interventions to influence improvements.
评估参与补充营养援助计划教育(SNAP-Ed)的地区随时间推移而发生的书面地方健康政策(LWPs)变化。
连续的、解释性混合方法。
从 2015 年 10 月 1 日至 2016 年 9 月 30 日,SNAP-Ed 机构从亚利桑那州的合作伙伴学区提交 LWP。他们收到了分数和定制的建议。为了评估变化,LWPs 在 2017 年 10 月 1 日至 2018 年 9 月 30 日之间重新评分。
16 个地方 SNAP-Ed 机构与 57 个地区合作。
SNAP-Ed 机构在 2 年前后期间支持的地区 LWP 修订。
健康学校评估工具(Wellness School Assessment Tool)衡量的政策全面性和强度,从 0(最差)到 100(最佳)。
配对 t 检验比较前后得分。对州教育机构行政审查的内容分析和 SNAP-Ed 叙述报告的主题分析,以探索原因。
总分数增加(全面性:+12.4,P <.001,95%置信区间,8.1-16.7;强度:+13.5,P <.001,95%CI,9.3-17.7)。除营养教育外,各部分的全面性和所有部分的强度都有所提高。定性结果表明,SNAP-Ed 干预措施与州和联邦的影响相结合,促成了这些改善。
SNAP-Ed 支持的地区的地方健康政策随时间推移而改善。州和联邦的 LWP 指南可以与 SNAP-Ed 干预措施协同工作,以促进改进。