Suppr超能文献

系统方法有助于解释在 SNAP-Ed 支持的学区中,当地健康政策的显著改善。

A Systems Approach Helps Explain Significant Improvements in Local Wellness Policies Among SNAP-Ed-Supported School Districts.

机构信息

Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

出版信息

J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Aug;52(8):766-774. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.02.010. Epub 2020 Apr 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess changes in written local wellness policies (LWPs) across time within Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education (SNAP-Ed)-participating districts.

DESIGN

Sequential, explanatory mixed methods.

SETTING

From October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016, SNAP-Ed agencies submitted LWPs from partner school districts in Arizona. They received back scores and customized recommendations. To assess changes, LWPs were rescored between October 1, 2017 and September 30, 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixteen local SNAP-Ed agencies worked with 57 districts.

INTERVENTIONS

Districts' LWP revisions supported by SNAP-Ed agencies during the 2-year pre-post period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Policy comprehensiveness and strength from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), measured by the Wellness School Assessment Tool.

ANALYSIS

Paired t test to compare pre-post scores. Content analysis of State Educational Agency administrative reviews and thematic analysis of SNAP-Ed narrative reports to explore causation.

RESULTS

Total scores increased (comprehensiveness: +12.4, P < .001, 95% confidence interval, 8.1-16.7; strength: +13.5, P < .001, 95% CI, 9.3-17.7). Improvements were also found for comprehensiveness by section, except Nutrition Education, and for strength across all sections. Qualitative findings suggest that SNAP-Ed interventions combined with state and federal influence contributed to the improvements.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Local wellness policies in SNAP-Ed-supported districts improved over time. State and federal LWP guidelines can work synergistically with SNAP-Ed interventions to influence improvements.

摘要

目的

评估参与补充营养援助计划教育(SNAP-Ed)的地区随时间推移而发生的书面地方健康政策(LWPs)变化。

设计

连续的、解释性混合方法。

设置

从 2015 年 10 月 1 日至 2016 年 9 月 30 日,SNAP-Ed 机构从亚利桑那州的合作伙伴学区提交 LWP。他们收到了分数和定制的建议。为了评估变化,LWPs 在 2017 年 10 月 1 日至 2018 年 9 月 30 日之间重新评分。

参与者

16 个地方 SNAP-Ed 机构与 57 个地区合作。

干预措施

SNAP-Ed 机构在 2 年前后期间支持的地区 LWP 修订。

主要结果测量

健康学校评估工具(Wellness School Assessment Tool)衡量的政策全面性和强度,从 0(最差)到 100(最佳)。

分析

配对 t 检验比较前后得分。对州教育机构行政审查的内容分析和 SNAP-Ed 叙述报告的主题分析,以探索原因。

结果

总分数增加(全面性:+12.4,P <.001,95%置信区间,8.1-16.7;强度:+13.5,P <.001,95%CI,9.3-17.7)。除营养教育外,各部分的全面性和所有部分的强度都有所提高。定性结果表明,SNAP-Ed 干预措施与州和联邦的影响相结合,促成了这些改善。

结论和意义

SNAP-Ed 支持的地区的地方健康政策随时间推移而改善。州和联邦的 LWP 指南可以与 SNAP-Ed 干预措施协同工作,以促进改进。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验