Settembre Nicla, Biancari Fausto, Spillerova Kristyna, Albäck Anders, Söderström Maria, Venermo Maarit
Department of Vascular Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Vascular Surgery, Nancy University Hospital and University of Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Heart Center, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;68:384-390. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.03.042. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
In the context of chronic limb-threatening ischemia, the prognostic impact of angiosome-targeted revascularization and of the status of the pedal arch are debated.
This series includes 580 patients who underwent endovascular (n = 407) and surgical revascularization (n = 173) of the infrapopliteal arteries for chronic limb-threatening ischemia associated with foot ulcer or gangrene. The risk of major amputation after infrapopliteal revascularization was assessed by a competing risk approach. A subanalysis was made separately for patients who underwent endovascular or open surgical revascularization.
At 2 years, survival was 65.1% and leg salvage was 76.1%. Multivariable competing risk analysis showed that C-reactive protein ≥10 mg/dL, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, increased number of affected angiosomes, and the incomplete or total absence of pedal arch compared with complete pedal arch (CPA) were independent predictors of major amputation after infrapopliteal revascularization. Multivariable analysis showed increasing risk estimates of major amputation in patients with incomplete (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 2.131; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.282-3.543) and no visualized pedal arch (SHR, 3.022; 95% CI, 1.553-5.883) compared with CPA. Pedal arch was important even if angiosome-targeted revascularization was achieved: Angiosome-directed revascularization in presence of CPA had a lower risk of major amputation (adjusted SHR, 0.463; 95% CI, 0.240-0.894) compared with angiosome-directed revascularization without CPA. In the subanalysis, among patients who underwent endovascular revascularization, CPA (SHR, 0.509; 95% CI, 0.286-0.905) and angiosome-targeted revascularization (SHR, 0.613; 95% CI, 0.394-0.956) were associated with a lower risk of major amputation.
Competing risk analysis showed that a patent pedal arch had significant impact on leg salvage and that the subset of patients undergoing endovascular procedure may most benefit of an angiosome-targeted revascularization.
在慢性肢体威胁性缺血的背景下,血管区域靶向血运重建和足弓状态的预后影响存在争议。
本系列研究纳入了580例因足部溃疡或坏疽伴慢性肢体威胁性缺血而接受腘动脉以下血管腔内(n = 407)和外科血运重建(n = 173)的患者。采用竞争风险法评估腘动脉以下血运重建术后大截肢的风险。对接受血管腔内或开放手术血运重建的患者分别进行亚组分析。
2年时,生存率为65.1%,保肢率为76.1%。多变量竞争风险分析显示,与完全足弓(CPA)相比,C反应蛋白≥10 mg/dL、糖尿病、类风湿关节炎、受累血管区域数量增加以及足弓不完全或完全缺失是腘动脉以下血运重建术后大截肢的独立预测因素。多变量分析显示,与CPA相比,足弓不完全(亚分布风险比[SHR],2.131;95%置信区间[95%CI],1.282 - 3.543)和未显影足弓(SHR,3.022;95%CI,1.553 - 5.883)的患者大截肢风险估计增加。即使实现了血管区域靶向血运重建,足弓也很重要:与无CPA的血管区域靶向血运重建相比,有CPA的血管区域靶向血运重建大截肢风险较低(校正后SHR,0.463;95%CI,0.240 - 0.894)。在亚组分析中,在接受血管腔内血运重建的患者中,CPA(SHR,0.509;95%CI,0.286 - 0.905)和血管区域靶向血运重建(SHR,0.613;95%CI,0.394 - 0.956)与较低的大截肢风险相关。
竞争风险分析表明,通畅的足弓对保肢有显著影响,且接受血管腔内手术的患者亚组可能从血管区域靶向血运重建中获益最大。