Suppr超能文献

手部手术患者术前视觉模拟量表评分记忆的可靠性

The Reliability of Remembered Pretreatment Visual Analog Scale Scores among Hand-Surgery Patients.

作者信息

Finsen Vilhjalmur, Hillesund Sigrun, Fromreide Ida

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

J Hand Microsurg. 2020 Apr;12(1):8-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683462. Epub 2019 Apr 17.

Abstract

In clinical audits in which preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores were not recorded, it would be useful if such scores could be re-created at the time of review.  We recorded VAS score for pain during the past week before surgery for 245 consecutive hand-surgery patients scheduled for planned surgery during a 6-month period. A total of 30 patients who refused to participate or were unable to respond were excluded. The remaining 215 patients were contacted after 21 months and asked to furnish a new VAS score of the pain they remembered to have had during the last week before surgery. Responses were analyzed with a Bland-Altman plot.  One hundred and thirty-one (61%) of the patients responded. The mean remembered preoperative score was higher than the mean real preoperative score in all diagnosis groups. The mean difference was 10 mm (standard deviation: 22 mm; standard error of the mean: 2 mm). The lower and upper limits of 95% agreement for individual scores were -33 and 53 mm, whereas the lower and upper limits of the 95% confidence interval of the mean were 6 and 14 mm.  It may be possible to predict the mean real preoperative VAS score in groups of patients with accuracy using the remembered preoperative score. In individual patients, remembered preoperative VAS scores are far too inaccurate to be of value. However, real preoperative scores should be used whenever possible.

摘要

在术前视觉模拟评分量表(VAS)分数未被记录的临床审计中,如果在审查时能够重新生成这些分数将很有用。

我们记录了连续245例计划在6个月内进行手术的手部手术患者术前一周的疼痛VAS评分。共有30例拒绝参与或无法回应的患者被排除。在21个月后联系了其余215例患者,要求他们提供一个关于他们记得术前最后一周疼痛情况的新VAS评分。使用Bland-Altman图对回答进行分析。

131例(61%)患者做出了回应。在所有诊断组中,记忆中的术前平均评分高于实际术前平均评分。平均差异为10毫米(标准差:22毫米;平均标准误差:2毫米)。个体评分95%一致性的下限和上限分别为-33和53毫米,而均值95%置信区间的下限和上限分别为6和14毫米。

使用记忆中的术前评分可能能够准确预测患者群体的实际术前VAS平均评分。对于个体患者,记忆中的术前VAS评分准确性太差,没有价值。然而,只要有可能,应使用实际术前评分。

相似文献

1
The Reliability of Remembered Pretreatment Visual Analog Scale Scores among Hand-Surgery Patients.
J Hand Microsurg. 2020 Apr;12(1):8-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683462. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
2
The reliability of remembered pre-operative patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation (PRWHE) scores.
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2018 Dec 6;10(4):7682. doi: 10.4081/or.2018.7682.
3
The value of remembered pre-operative quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) scores.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018 Oct;52(5):294-300. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2018.1483938. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
4
Remembered preoperative Quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) scores.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017 Jan;42(1):78-83. doi: 10.1177/1753193416665299. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
5
[Clinical outcomes of cervical disc herniation treated by posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy].
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 1;55(12):923-927. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2017.12.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Atorvastatin Against Venous Thromboembolism After Total Hip Arthroplasty.
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2025 Jun 1;25(2):201-207.
2
Comparative study of long-term efficacy of spinal fusion surgery and non-surgical treatment for chronic radicular lumbar disease.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2025 Mar 17;71(1):e20240902. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20240902. eCollection 2025.
4
The Outcome of the WALANT Technique in Primary Hand Flexor Tendons Repair.
JPRAS Open. 2023 Nov 30;40:77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.11.012. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for Hypertension Complicated by Refractory Heart Failure: An Analysis of Safety and Nursing Highlights.
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Sep 14;2022:7951744. doi: 10.1155/2022/7951744. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The value of remembered pre-operative quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) scores.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018 Oct;52(5):294-300. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2018.1483938. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
3
Remembered preoperative Quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) scores.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017 Jan;42(1):78-83. doi: 10.1177/1753193416665299. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
5
Preferred Presentation of the Visual Analog Scale for Measurement of Postoperative Pain.
Pain Pract. 2016 Nov;16(8):980-984. doi: 10.1111/papr.12344. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
6
Minimal important changes and differences in elective hand surgery.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015 Nov;40(9):900-12. doi: 10.1177/1753193414553908. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
8
9
The recall DASH score--a novel research tool.
Hand Surg. 2013;18(1):11-4. doi: 10.1142/S0218810413500020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验