• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手部手术患者术前视觉模拟量表评分记忆的可靠性

The Reliability of Remembered Pretreatment Visual Analog Scale Scores among Hand-Surgery Patients.

作者信息

Finsen Vilhjalmur, Hillesund Sigrun, Fromreide Ida

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

J Hand Microsurg. 2020 Apr;12(1):8-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683462. Epub 2019 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1055/s-0039-1683462
PMID:32280175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7141901/
Abstract

In clinical audits in which preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores were not recorded, it would be useful if such scores could be re-created at the time of review.  We recorded VAS score for pain during the past week before surgery for 245 consecutive hand-surgery patients scheduled for planned surgery during a 6-month period. A total of 30 patients who refused to participate or were unable to respond were excluded. The remaining 215 patients were contacted after 21 months and asked to furnish a new VAS score of the pain they remembered to have had during the last week before surgery. Responses were analyzed with a Bland-Altman plot.  One hundred and thirty-one (61%) of the patients responded. The mean remembered preoperative score was higher than the mean real preoperative score in all diagnosis groups. The mean difference was 10 mm (standard deviation: 22 mm; standard error of the mean: 2 mm). The lower and upper limits of 95% agreement for individual scores were -33 and 53 mm, whereas the lower and upper limits of the 95% confidence interval of the mean were 6 and 14 mm.  It may be possible to predict the mean real preoperative VAS score in groups of patients with accuracy using the remembered preoperative score. In individual patients, remembered preoperative VAS scores are far too inaccurate to be of value. However, real preoperative scores should be used whenever possible.

摘要

在术前视觉模拟评分量表(VAS)分数未被记录的临床审计中,如果在审查时能够重新生成这些分数将很有用。

我们记录了连续245例计划在6个月内进行手术的手部手术患者术前一周的疼痛VAS评分。共有30例拒绝参与或无法回应的患者被排除。在21个月后联系了其余215例患者,要求他们提供一个关于他们记得术前最后一周疼痛情况的新VAS评分。使用Bland-Altman图对回答进行分析。

131例(61%)患者做出了回应。在所有诊断组中,记忆中的术前平均评分高于实际术前平均评分。平均差异为10毫米(标准差:22毫米;平均标准误差:2毫米)。个体评分95%一致性的下限和上限分别为-33和53毫米,而均值95%置信区间的下限和上限分别为6和14毫米。

使用记忆中的术前评分可能能够准确预测患者群体的实际术前VAS平均评分。对于个体患者,记忆中的术前VAS评分准确性太差,没有价值。然而,只要有可能,应使用实际术前评分。

相似文献

1
The Reliability of Remembered Pretreatment Visual Analog Scale Scores among Hand-Surgery Patients.手部手术患者术前视觉模拟量表评分记忆的可靠性
J Hand Microsurg. 2020 Apr;12(1):8-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683462. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
2
The reliability of remembered pre-operative patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation (PRWHE) scores.术前患者自评手腕和手部评估(PRWHE)评分的可靠性。
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2018 Dec 6;10(4):7682. doi: 10.4081/or.2018.7682.
3
The value of remembered pre-operative quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) scores.术前记忆性手臂、肩部和手部快速功能障碍(QuickDASH)评分的价值。
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018 Oct;52(5):294-300. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2018.1483938. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
4
Remembered preoperative Quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) scores.术前记录的手臂、肩部和手部快速功能障碍(QuickDASH)评分。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017 Jan;42(1):78-83. doi: 10.1177/1753193416665299. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
5
[Clinical outcomes of cervical disc herniation treated by posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy].[后路经皮内镜下颈椎间盘切除术治疗颈椎间盘突出症的临床疗效]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 1;55(12):923-927. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2017.12.009.
6
Can Patients Accurately Recall their Preoperative Pain and Functional Scores Following Rotator Cuff Repair and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty?肩袖修复术和全肩关节置换术后患者能否准确回忆术前疼痛及功能评分?
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2023;11(3):160-165. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2021.61260.3006.
7
Preoperative mental health status may not be predictive of improvements in patient-reported outcomes following an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.术前心理健康状况可能无法预测颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后患者报告结局的改善情况。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Feb;26(2):177-182. doi: 10.3171/2016.7.SPINE16472. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
8
Remembered International Index of Erectile Function domain scores are not accurate in assessing preoperative potency in candidates for bilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.在评估双侧保留神经的耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术候选人的术前性功能时,记忆性国际勃起功能指数领域评分并不准确。
J Sex Med. 2008 Mar;5(3):677-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00711.x. Epub 2008 Jan 10.
9
Patients recall worse preoperative pain after shoulder arthroplasty than originally reported: a study of recall accuracy using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score.患者回忆的肩关节置换术后术前疼痛比最初报告的更严重:一项使用美国肩肘外科医师评分的回忆准确性研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Mar;26(3):506-511. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
10
A Visual Analog Scale to assess anxiety in children during anesthesia induction (VAS-I): Results supporting its validity in a sample of day care surgery patients.一种用于评估儿童麻醉诱导期焦虑的视觉模拟量表(VAS-I):支持其在日间手术患者样本中有效性的结果。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Sep;27(9):955-961. doi: 10.1111/pan.13206. Epub 2017 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Atorvastatin Against Venous Thromboembolism After Total Hip Arthroplasty.阿托伐他汀对全髋关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞的疗效
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2025 Jun 1;25(2):201-207.
2
Comparative study of long-term efficacy of spinal fusion surgery and non-surgical treatment for chronic radicular lumbar disease.脊柱融合手术与非手术治疗慢性神经根型腰椎病的长期疗效比较研究
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2025 Mar 17;71(1):e20240902. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20240902. eCollection 2025.
3
Postoperative Benefits of Soft Tissue Wrist Arthroscopy: Retro- and Prospective Analyses of Outcome Measures.腕关节软组织关节镜手术的术后益处:结果指标的回顾性与前瞻性分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 15;13(8):2280. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082280.
4
The Outcome of the WALANT Technique in Primary Hand Flexor Tendons Repair.腕部局部麻醉无止血带技术(WALANT)用于一期手部屈肌腱修复的效果
JPRAS Open. 2023 Nov 30;40:77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.11.012. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for Hypertension Complicated by Refractory Heart Failure: An Analysis of Safety and Nursing Highlights.连续性肾脏替代治疗在高血压合并难治性心力衰竭中的应用:安全性分析及护理要点。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Sep 14;2022:7951744. doi: 10.1155/2022/7951744. eCollection 2022.
6
Effect of hip replacement surgery on clinical efficacy, VAS score and Harris hip score in patients with femoral head necrosis.髋关节置换手术对股骨头坏死患者临床疗效、视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分及Harris髋关节评分的影响。
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Apr 15;13(4):3851-3855. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The value of remembered pre-operative quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) scores.术前记忆性手臂、肩部和手部快速功能障碍(QuickDASH)评分的价值。
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018 Oct;52(5):294-300. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2018.1483938. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
2
Measuring acute postoperative pain using the visual analog scale: the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state.使用视觉模拟评分法测量急性术后疼痛:最小临床重要差异和患者可接受的症状状态。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):424-429. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew466.
3
Remembered preoperative Quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) scores.术前记录的手臂、肩部和手部快速功能障碍(QuickDASH)评分。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017 Jan;42(1):78-83. doi: 10.1177/1753193416665299. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
4
Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale (VAS) measuring pain after shoulder arthroplasty.确定美国肩肘外科医生评分、简易肩部测试以及用于测量肩关节置换术后疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)的最小临床重要差异。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jan;26(1):144-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
5
Preferred Presentation of the Visual Analog Scale for Measurement of Postoperative Pain.用于测量术后疼痛的视觉模拟量表的首选呈现方式。
Pain Pract. 2016 Nov;16(8):980-984. doi: 10.1111/papr.12344. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
6
Minimal important changes and differences in elective hand surgery.择期手部手术中的最小重要变化与差异
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015 Nov;40(9):900-12. doi: 10.1177/1753193414553908. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
7
A simple visual analog scale for pain is as responsive as the WOMAC, the SF-36, and the EQ-5D in measuring outcomes of revision hip arthroplasty.一种简单的疼痛视觉模拟评分与 WOMAC、SF-36 和 EQ-5D 一样灵敏,可用于测量髋关节翻修手术的结果。
Acta Orthop. 2014 Apr;85(2):128-32. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.887951. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
8
Accuracy of patient recall of hand and elbow disability on the QuickDASH questionnaire over a two-year period.患者在两年内对手和肘部残疾的 QuickDASH 问卷的回忆准确性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Nov 20;95(22):e176. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01485.
9
The recall DASH score--a novel research tool.召回式DASH评分——一种新型研究工具。
Hand Surg. 2013;18(1):11-4. doi: 10.1142/S0218810413500020.
10
Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP).成人疼痛测量方法:疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS疼痛)、疼痛数字评定量表(NRS疼痛)、麦吉尔疼痛问卷(MPQ)、简化麦吉尔疼痛问卷(SF-MPQ)、慢性疼痛分级量表(CPGS)、简短健康调查36项身体疼痛量表(SF-36 BPS)以及间歇性和持续性骨关节炎疼痛测量量表(ICOAP)。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543.