Suppr超能文献

手部手术患者术前视觉模拟量表评分记忆的可靠性

The Reliability of Remembered Pretreatment Visual Analog Scale Scores among Hand-Surgery Patients.

作者信息

Finsen Vilhjalmur, Hillesund Sigrun, Fromreide Ida

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

J Hand Microsurg. 2020 Apr;12(1):8-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683462. Epub 2019 Apr 17.

Abstract

In clinical audits in which preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores were not recorded, it would be useful if such scores could be re-created at the time of review.  We recorded VAS score for pain during the past week before surgery for 245 consecutive hand-surgery patients scheduled for planned surgery during a 6-month period. A total of 30 patients who refused to participate or were unable to respond were excluded. The remaining 215 patients were contacted after 21 months and asked to furnish a new VAS score of the pain they remembered to have had during the last week before surgery. Responses were analyzed with a Bland-Altman plot.  One hundred and thirty-one (61%) of the patients responded. The mean remembered preoperative score was higher than the mean real preoperative score in all diagnosis groups. The mean difference was 10 mm (standard deviation: 22 mm; standard error of the mean: 2 mm). The lower and upper limits of 95% agreement for individual scores were -33 and 53 mm, whereas the lower and upper limits of the 95% confidence interval of the mean were 6 and 14 mm.  It may be possible to predict the mean real preoperative VAS score in groups of patients with accuracy using the remembered preoperative score. In individual patients, remembered preoperative VAS scores are far too inaccurate to be of value. However, real preoperative scores should be used whenever possible.

摘要

在术前视觉模拟评分量表(VAS)分数未被记录的临床审计中,如果在审查时能够重新生成这些分数将很有用。

我们记录了连续245例计划在6个月内进行手术的手部手术患者术前一周的疼痛VAS评分。共有30例拒绝参与或无法回应的患者被排除。在21个月后联系了其余215例患者,要求他们提供一个关于他们记得术前最后一周疼痛情况的新VAS评分。使用Bland-Altman图对回答进行分析。

131例(61%)患者做出了回应。在所有诊断组中,记忆中的术前平均评分高于实际术前平均评分。平均差异为10毫米(标准差:22毫米;平均标准误差:2毫米)。个体评分95%一致性的下限和上限分别为-33和53毫米,而均值95%置信区间的下限和上限分别为6和14毫米。

使用记忆中的术前评分可能能够准确预测患者群体的实际术前VAS平均评分。对于个体患者,记忆中的术前VAS评分准确性太差,没有价值。然而,只要有可能,应使用实际术前评分。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Minimal important changes and differences in elective hand surgery.择期手部手术中的最小重要变化与差异
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015 Nov;40(9):900-12. doi: 10.1177/1753193414553908. Epub 2014 Oct 15.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验