Susarla Srinivas M, Ettinger Russell, Preston Kathryn, Egbert Mark A
Craniofacial Center, Seattle Children's Hospital, Divisions of Plastic and Craniofacial Surgery, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, and Craniofacial Orthodontics, Seattle, WA.
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Jul-Aug;31(5):1459-1463. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006456.
To discuss technical modifications specific to the cleft Le Fort I osteotomy that improve mobilization and demonstrate the stability of the maxilla at the Le Fort I level in a cohort of patients with cleft palate (with or without cleft lip) who underwent traditional maxillary advancement.
This was a retrospective evaluation of patients with cleft palate (+/- cleft lip) who underwent orthognathic surgery for management of skeletal malocclusions. All study subjects had a Le Fort I osteotomy +/- bilateral mandibular sagittal split osteotomies. The cleft Le Fort I osteotomy technique is modified to extensively release fibrous tissue and scar from the posterior maxilla, including around the tuberosity, along the posterior maxillary sinus wall, and circumferentially around the descending palatine canal. Maxillary position was assessed using angular and linear measurements pre-operatively (T0), immediately post-operatively (T1), and at 1-year post-operatively (T2). Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed; a P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Twenty-eight patients with cleft palate (with or without cleft lip) were included. The sample's mean age was 18.9 ± 1.4 years and included 11 females. The majority of subjects (64.3%) underwent bimaxillary surgery; eight subjects (28.6%) had segmental maxillary surgery and 14 subjects (50%) had simultaneous maxillary interpositional bone grafting. The mean maxillary sagittal advancement was 6.1 mm (range: 0-10 mm). At 1-year post-operatively, the absolute change in SNA was 0.7 ± 0.9 degrees; the absolute change in maxillary sagittal position was 0.8 ± 0.6 mm. There was no association between the magnitude of advancement and the magnitude of position change (P = 0.86). Stability was not influenced by segmental surgery, bone grafting, or bimaxillary surgery (P > 0.33).
Using a modified technique with extensive release of posterior scar and graduated intra-operative traction, maxillary advancement of up to 10 mm can be performed in patients with cleft palate (± cleft lip) with sagittal relapse of < 1 mm at 1-year post-operatively.
探讨腭裂(伴或不伴唇裂)患者在接受传统上颌前徙术后,针对改良Le Fort I截骨术的技术改进,该改进可提高上颌骨的移动性,并证明Le Fort I水平上颌骨的稳定性。
对接受正颌手术治疗骨骼错合畸形的腭裂(±唇裂)患者进行回顾性评估。所有研究对象均接受了Le Fort I截骨术±双侧下颌矢状劈开截骨术。改良腭裂Le Fort I截骨术技术,广泛松解上颌后部包括结节周围、上颌窦后壁沿线以及腭降管周围的纤维组织和瘢痕。术前(T0)、术后即刻(T1)和术后1年(T2)使用角度和线性测量评估上颌位置。计算描述性和双变量统计量;P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
纳入28例腭裂(伴或不伴唇裂)患者。样本的平均年龄为18.9±1.4岁,其中女性11例。大多数受试者(64.3%)接受了双颌手术;8例受试者(28.6%)接受了节段性上颌手术,14例受试者(50%)同时进行了上颌间置骨移植。上颌矢状前徙的平均值为6.1mm(范围:0 - 10mm)。术后1年,SNA的绝对变化为0.7±0.9度;上颌矢状位置的绝对变化为0.8±0.6mm。前徙幅度与位置变化幅度之间无相关性(P = 0.86)。稳定性不受节段性手术、骨移植或双颌手术的影响(P>0.33)。
采用改良技术广泛松解后部瘢痕并在术中进行逐步牵引,腭裂(±唇裂)患者可实现高达10mm的上颌前徙,术后1年矢状复发<1mm。