• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国 2 型糖尿病管理中的社会人口统计学差异。

Sociodemographic disparities in the management of type 2 diabetes in the United States.

机构信息

Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Kantar, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Jun;36(6):967-976. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1756764. Epub 2020 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1080/03007995.2020.1756764
PMID:32297530
Abstract

To examine the potential sociodemographic disparities in type 2 diabetes (T2D) management and care among US adult individuals, after controlling for clinical and behavioral factors. This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals with T2D ( = 4552) from a linked database of the National Health and Wellness Survey and a large US ambulatory electronic health record (EHR) database. This study period was between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2018 and individuals were followed up for at least 6 months through EHR after the completion of the survey. The sociodemographic characteristics included gender, race, ethnicity, marital status, education, employment status, household income, insurance status, and geographic region. The independent variables included testing and control of HbA1c, blood pressure (BP), and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C); hypoglycemia, emergency room (ER) visits, and all-cause hospitalization. Multivariable analyses were conducted using generalized linear models. The percentage of uncontrolled HbA1c was 38.6%. With clinical and behavioral characteristics adjusted, individuals living in the Northeast region had 30% higher odds of having HbA1c testing than those who lived in the South. Blacks and Asians were less likely to have HbA1c control than Whites. Uninsured individuals had a lower likelihood of receiving HbA1c, BP, or LDL-C testing compared with commercial insurers. Individuals with low income were more likely to have higher ER visits and hospitalizations. Potential sociodemographic disparities exist in T2D management and care in the US, indicating the needs for improvement in healthcare access, educational and behavioral programs, as well as disease and treatment management in these subgroups.

摘要

为了研究在控制临床和行为因素后,美国成年个体 2 型糖尿病(T2D)管理和护理方面潜在的社会人口统计学差异。这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了来自国家健康和健康调查的数据库和大型美国门诊电子健康记录(EHR)数据库的 T2D 患者( = 4552)。本研究期间为 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日,在完成调查后,通过 EHR 对至少 6 个月的个体进行随访。社会人口统计学特征包括性别、种族、民族、婚姻状况、教育程度、就业状况、家庭收入、保险状况和地理位置。自变量包括 HbA1c、血压(BP)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的检测和控制;低血糖、急诊室(ER)就诊和全因住院。使用广义线性模型进行多变量分析。未控制的 HbA1c 的百分比为 38.6%。在调整了临床和行为特征后,与居住在南部的个体相比,居住在东北部的个体进行 HbA1c 检测的可能性要高出 30%。黑人及亚洲人进行 HbA1c 控制的可能性要低于白人。与商业保险公司相比,未参保的个体接受 HbA1c、BP 或 LDL-C 检测的可能性较低。收入较低的个体更有可能进行更多的 ER 就诊和住院治疗。美国 T2D 管理和护理中存在潜在的社会人口统计学差异,表明需要改善医疗保健可及性、教育和行为计划,以及这些亚组的疾病和治疗管理。

相似文献

1
Sociodemographic disparities in the management of type 2 diabetes in the United States.美国 2 型糖尿病管理中的社会人口统计学差异。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Jun;36(6):967-976. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1756764. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
2
Disparities in glycaemic control, monitoring, and treatment of type 2 diabetes in England: A retrospective cohort analysis.英格兰 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制、监测和治疗的差异:一项回顾性队列分析。
PLoS Med. 2019 Oct 7;16(10):e1002942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002942. eCollection 2019 Oct.
3
Association of Cumulative Multimorbidity, Glycemic Control, and Medication Use With Hypoglycemia-Related Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations Among Adults With Diabetes.累积多病共存、血糖控制和药物使用与成年糖尿病患者低血糖相关急诊就诊和住院的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919099. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19099.
4
Medication Adherence Does Not Explain Black-White Differences in Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Control among Insured Patients with Diabetes.药物依从性并不能解释糖尿病参保患者中黑人和白人在心血管代谢危险因素控制方面的差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Feb;31(2):188-195. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3486-0.
5
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Diabetes Quality of Care: the Role of Healthcare Access and Socioeconomic Status.种族/民族差异对糖尿病护理质量的影响:医疗保健可及性和社会经济地位的作用。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Feb;5(1):7-14. doi: 10.1007/s40615-016-0335-8. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
6
Reducing racial/ethnic disparities in diabetes: the Coached Care (R2D2C2) project.减少糖尿病的种族/民族差异:教练式护理(R2D2C2)项目。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Oct;28(10):1340-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2452-y.
7
Racial/ethnic differences in healthcare use among patients with uncontrolled and controlled diabetes.患有未控制和控制良好糖尿病患者的医疗保健使用中的种族/民族差异。
Ethn Health. 2019 Apr;24(3):245-256. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2017.1315372. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
8
Exploring the association of social connections and food security among adults with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: a population-based study.探讨社会联系与未控制 2 型糖尿病成年人食物安全之间的关联:一项基于人群的研究。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2024 Oct 3;43(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00648-7.
9
Effect of a Collaborative Care Model on Depressive Symptoms and Glycated Hemoglobin, Blood Pressure, and Serum Cholesterol Among Patients With Depression and Diabetes in India: The INDEPENDENT Randomized Clinical Trial.印度一项针对伴发抑郁和糖尿病患者的随机临床试验(INDEPENDENT)表明,协同护理模式可改善抑郁症状及糖化血红蛋白、血压和血清胆固醇水平。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 18;324(7):651-662. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11747.
10
Impact of diabetes control on mortality by race in a national cohort of veterans.糖尿病控制对全国退伍军人队列中不同种族死亡率的影响。
Ann Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;23(2):74-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.11.002. Epub 2012 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
FXYD2 marks and regulates maturity of β cells via ion channel-mediated signal transduction.FXYD2通过离子通道介导的信号转导标记并调节β细胞的成熟。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jun 4;16(1):5110. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60188-4.
2
Unveiling inequalities: Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in diabetes: Findings from the 2007-2020 NHANES data among U.S. adults.揭示不平等现象:糖尿病中的种族、民族和社会经济差异:2007 - 2020年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)针对美国成年人的数据研究结果
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Dec 27;50:102957. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102957. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Immunoprotection Strategies in β-Cell Replacement Therapy: A Closer Look at Porcine Islet Xenotransplantation.
β 细胞替代治疗中的免疫保护策略:深入探讨猪胰岛异种移植。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024 Aug;11(31):e2401385. doi: 10.1002/advs.202401385. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
4
Investigation of geographic disparities of diabetes-related hospitalizations in Florida using flexible spatial scan statistics: An ecological study.利用灵活空间扫描统计调查佛罗里达州糖尿病住院相关的地理差异:一项生态研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 4;19(6):e0298182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298182. eCollection 2024.
5
Determinants of disparities of diabetes-related hospitalization rates in Florida: a retrospective ecological study using a multiscale geographically weighted regression approach.佛罗里达州糖尿病相关住院率差异的决定因素:使用多尺度地理加权回归方法的回顾性生态研究。
Int J Health Geogr. 2024 Jan 6;23(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12942-023-00360-5.
6
A Cohort Study on the Outcome of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.糖尿病足溃疡结局的队列研究
Cureus. 2023 Oct 31;15(10):e48030. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48030. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
Medication use and contextual factors associated with meeting guideline-based glycemic levels in diabetes among a nationally representative sample.在一个具有全国代表性的样本中,与达到糖尿病基于指南的血糖水平相关的药物使用和背景因素。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 31;10:1158454. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1158454. eCollection 2023.
8
Risk, lifestyle and non-communicable diseases of poverty.风险、生活方式与贫困相关的非传染性疾病。
Global Health. 2023 Mar 2;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00914-z.
9
Development and calibration data for the Healthcare Access Item Bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.医疗保健获取项目库的开发和校准数据:一种用于 2 型糖尿病患者的新型计算机自适应测试。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Mar;32(3):781-796. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03278-w. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
10
Development and calibration data for the Illness Burden item bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.疾病负担条目库的开发和校准数据:一种用于 2 型糖尿病患者的新型计算机自适应测试。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Mar;32(3):797-811. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03282-0. Epub 2022 Oct 25.