Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Yale-New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, New Haven, CT.
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Jul;27(7):570-579. doi: 10.1111/acem.13971. Epub 2020 May 20.
We sought to develop a claims-based definition of unscheduled care to describe the use and role of the emergency department (ED) in providing unscheduled care to vulnerable older adult populations.
This study was a cross-sectional analysis of national 20% sample of Medicare beneficiaries included in the 2012 Chronic Condition Warehouse data set. We measured three outcomes: the number of ED visits per 1,000 Medicare beneficiaries, the proportion of all unscheduled ED and office-based visits occurring in the ED and the number of ED and non-ED unscheduled visits adjusting for risk factors. Each outcome was estimated for vulnerable subpopulations of Medicare beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs), dual eligibility, hospice enrollment, and skilled nursing facility use.
A total of 10,717,786 Medicare beneficiaries were included with 33,696,461 potentially unscheduled care visits of which 5,192,235 (15%) occurred in the ED, 364,334 (1.1%) in facility-based urgent care, and 31,570,113 (84%) in ambulatory office settings. In regression analyses each subpopulation was more likely to visit the ED for unscheduled care services than the reference population of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65 to 80. Dual-eligible beneficiaries demonstrated higher ED visit rates and lower non-ED visit rates for unscheduled care. The subpopulation with MCCs uses both the ED and the non-ED setting for unscheduled care more so than any other group.
Medicare beneficiaries, particularly vulnerable subpopulations, disproportionately visit the ED in comparison to physician offices for unscheduled care. Efforts to improve care coordination, measure quality, or reform payment to influence ED visitation should acknowledge these patterns and the unique availability of acute care services in the ED.
我们旨在开发一种基于索赔的非计划性护理定义,以描述急诊科(ED)在为弱势老年人群提供非计划性护理方面的使用和作用。
本研究是对 2012 年慢性病仓库数据集中包含的全国 20%的 Medicare 受益人的横断面分析。我们测量了三个结果:每 1000 名 Medicare 受益人中急诊就诊次数、所有非计划性急诊和门诊就诊中在 ED 发生的比例以及调整风险因素后的 ED 和非 ED 非计划性就诊次数。每个结果都针对患有多种慢性病(MCC)、双重资格、临终关怀登记和熟练护理设施使用的 Medicare 受益人的脆弱亚群进行估计。
共纳入 10717786 名 Medicare 受益人,其中有 33696461 次潜在的非计划性护理就诊,其中 5192235 次(15%)在 ED 就诊,364334 次(1.1%)在设施内紧急护理就诊,31570113 次(84%)在门诊办公室就诊。在回归分析中,每个亚组因非计划性护理就诊而访问 ED 的可能性都高于 65 至 80 岁的 Medicare 受益人的参考人群。双重资格受益人的非计划性护理就诊 ED 就诊率较高,而非 ED 就诊率较低。患有 MCC 的亚群比任何其他群体都更倾向于同时使用 ED 和非 ED 环境进行非计划性护理。
与医生办公室相比,Medicare 受益人,特别是弱势亚群,因非计划性护理而不成比例地访问 ED。为改善护理协调、衡量质量或改革支付以影响 ED 就诊而进行的努力应承认这些模式以及 ED 中急性护理服务的独特可用性。