Mian Mustafa, Fink Sarah, Ackland David, Wang Nathan, Dimitroulis George
Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
OMX Solutions, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jun;24(2):203-209. doi: 10.1007/s10006-020-00842-x. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of orthopantomograms (OPGs) when assessing post-operative temporomandibular joint (TMJ) implant position, compared with cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT).
A retrospective analysis was undertaken on six adult patients who were implanted with a custom TMJ prosthesis due to end-stage TMJ disease. Post-operative CBCT was compared with post-operative OPGs. Overall magnification of each OPG was calculated and used to linearly rescale each image. Implant position was assessed by measuring the gonion angle and the distance between each surgical screw and the mandibular gonion (SG length).
Mean magnification for OPGs was 24.2%. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in the gonion angle on OPGs compared with CBCT images. There was a mean decrease in SG lengths of 0.02 mm on OPGs, corresponding to error level of 5.31%. The 95% limits of agreement between OPGs and CBCT images for SG lengths were 1.65 mm and - 1.73 mm.
This study presents a clinically applicable and accurate first-line radiographic screening tool to assess TMJ implant position. When combined with clinical assessment, OPGs can help reduce the need for further imaging and radiation exposure post-operatively.
本研究旨在确定全景曲面断层片(OPG)在评估颞下颌关节(TMJ)植入物术后位置时的准确性,并与锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)进行比较。
对6例因终末期TMJ疾病植入定制TMJ假体的成年患者进行回顾性分析。将术后CBCT与术后OPG进行比较。计算每个OPG的总体放大率,并用于对每个图像进行线性重新缩放。通过测量下颌角以及每个手术螺钉与下颌角之间的距离(SG长度)来评估植入物位置。
OPG的平均放大率为24.2%。与CBCT图像相比,OPG上的下颌角无显著差异(p>0.05)。OPG上SG长度平均减少0.02mm,对应误差水平为5.31%。OPG与CBCT图像在SG长度方面的95%一致性界限为1.65mm和-1.73mm。
本研究提出了一种临床适用且准确的一线影像学筛查工具,用于评估TMJ植入物位置。当与临床评估相结合时,OPG有助于减少术后进一步成像和辐射暴露的需求。