Heart Center of Fujian Province, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Cardiol Young. 2020 May;30(5):599-606. doi: 10.1017/S1047951120000530. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
Outcome data of doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect closure in adults are limited.
A review was made of the inpatients >18 years of age who underwent doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect closure between June 2010 and June 2017.
The patients were categorised into two groups: The valve intervention group consisted of 31 patients who underwent aortic valvuloplasty, aortic valve replacement, or repair of sinus Valsalva aneurysm in addition to doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect closure; non-valvular intervention group comprised 58 patients who underwent only doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect closure. The groups did not differ by sex and age. Patients in the valve intervention group, with a larger ventricular septal defect size, were shorter and tended to be lighter. The valve intervention group had more patients with pneumonia perioperatively. No infective endocarditis and reoperation were noted during the study period. At last follow-up, 91 and 96.6% of the studied patients were free from left ventricle dilation and pulmonary hypertension. In patients without pre-operative aortic regurgitation, 12 developed new mild aortic regurgitation during the follow-up.
About 34.8% of adult patients with doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect required concurrent intervention on aortic valve or sinus Valsalva aneurysm. The midterm results of doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect closure in adult patients were favourable. However, the incidence of new mild aortic regurgitation after ventricular septal defect closure was high (27.3%). Long-term follow-up of aortic regurgitation progression is needed.
成人双出口型室间隔缺损合并主动脉瓣病变或窦瘤修补术后的结局数据有限。
回顾性分析 2010 年 6 月至 2017 年 6 月期间行双出口型室间隔缺损合并主动脉瓣病变或窦瘤修补术的成年患者。
患者分为两组:瓣膜干预组 31 例,除双出口型室间隔缺损修补术外,还接受了主动脉瓣成形术、主动脉瓣置换术或窦瘤修补术;非瓣膜干预组 58 例,仅接受双出口型室间隔缺损修补术。两组患者在性别和年龄方面无差异。瓣膜干预组患者室间隔缺损较大,且身材较矮,体重较轻。瓣膜干预组患者围手术期肺炎更多。研究期间无感染性心内膜炎和再次手术。末次随访时,91%和 96.6%的患者左心室无扩张和肺动脉高压。在术前无主动脉瓣反流的患者中,12 例在随访期间出现新的轻度主动脉瓣反流。
约 34.8%的成人双出口型室间隔缺损患者需要同期行主动脉瓣或窦瘤修补术。成人双出口型室间隔缺损修补术的中期结果良好。然而,室间隔缺损修补术后新发轻度主动脉瓣反流的发生率较高(27.3%)。需要长期随访主动脉瓣反流的进展情况。