West Brady T, Elliott Michael R, Mneimneh Zeina, Wagner James, Peytchev Andy, Trappmann Mark
Research Associate Professor in the Survey Methodology Program (SMP), Survey Research Center (SRC), Institute for Social Research (ISR), University of Michigan, 426 Thompson Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, USA.
Professor of Biostatistics at the School of Public Health and Research Professor in the Survey Methodology Program (SMP), Survey Research Center (SRC), Institute for Social Research (ISR), University of Michigan.
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2020 Apr;8(2):304-324. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smy028. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
This article presents results from an experimental study in Germany designed to test the effectiveness of a novel protocol for matching participants in a national panel survey with interviewers employing computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) on selected sociodemographic features, including sex, age, and education. We specifically focus on the ability of the protocol to engender close matches between respondents and interviewers in terms of these features, using both theory and empirical evidence to suggest that this type of matching will improve cooperation rates in surveys employing CATI. We also focus on indicators of "success" at first contact (defined as a successful interview or establishment of an appointment for an interview) as a function of whether the matching protocol was in use on a given day and whether specific types of matches generated higher rates of success overall. We find strong evidence of the protocol effectively establishing close matches, and we also observe that matches based on education proved especially effective for rates of "success" in a panel survey that focused primarily on labor market topics. We conclude with thoughts on practical implementation of this approach in other settings and suggested directions for future work in this area.
本文介绍了德国一项实验研究的结果,该研究旨在测试一种新方案的有效性,该方案用于在全国性的小组调查中,根据性别、年龄和教育程度等选定的社会人口特征,将参与者与采用计算机辅助电话访谈(CATI)的访谈员进行匹配。我们特别关注该方案在这些特征方面促成受访者与访谈员紧密匹配的能力,运用理论和实证证据表明,这种类型的匹配将提高采用CATI的调查中的合作率。我们还关注首次接触时“成功”的指标(定义为成功访谈或确定访谈预约),它是关于给定日期是否使用匹配方案以及特定类型的匹配是否总体上产生更高成功率的函数。我们发现有力证据表明该方案有效地建立了紧密匹配,并且我们还观察到,在主要关注劳动力市场主题的小组调查中,基于教育程度的匹配对于“成功”率尤其有效。我们最后思考了这种方法在其他环境中的实际实施情况,并提出了该领域未来工作的建议方向。