Suppr超能文献

一项前瞻性研究比较了腹部 CT 扫描患者仅用水与阳性口服对比剂的效果。

A prospective study comparing water only with positive oral contrast in patients undergoing abdominal CT scan.

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 22;10(1):6813. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63838-3.

Abstract

Consecutive adults scheduled to undergo abdominal CT with oral contrast were asked to choose between 1000 ml water only or positive oral contrast (50 ml Télébrix-Gastro diluted in 950 ml water). Two abdominal radiologists independently reviewed each scan for image quality of the abdomen, the diagnostic confidence per system (gastrointestinalsystem/organs/peritoneum/retroperitoneum/lymph nodes) and overall diagnostic confidence to address the clinical question (not able/partial able/fully able). Radiation exposure was extracted from dose reports. Differences between both groups were evaluated by Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney-U-test or chi-square-test. Of the 320participants, 233chose water only. All baseline characteristics, image quality of the abdomen and the diagnostic confidence of the organs were comparable between groups and both observers. Diagnostic confidence in the water only group was more commonly scored as less than good by observer1. The results were as follows: the gastrointestinal system(18/233vs1/87; p = 0.031), peritoneum (21/233vs1/87; p = 0.012), retroperitoneum (11/233vs0/87; p = 0.040) and lymph nodes (11/233vs0/87; p = 0.040). These structures were scored as comparable between both groups by observer2. The diagnostic confidence to address the clinical question could be partially addressed in 6/233 vs 0/87 patients (p = 0.259). The water only group showed a tendency towards less radiation exposure. In summary, most scan ratings were comparable between positive contrast and water only, but slightly favored positive oral contrast for one reader for some abdominal structures. Therefore, water only can replace positive oral contrast in the majority of the outpatients scheduled to undergo an abdominal CT.

摘要

连续接受腹部 CT 检查并口服对比剂的成年人被要求在 1000ml 水或阳性口服对比剂(50ml Télébrix-Gastro 稀释在 950ml 水中)之间做出选择。两名腹部放射科医生独立审查了每个扫描图像的腹部图像质量,每个系统(胃肠道/器官/腹膜/腹膜后/淋巴结)的诊断信心以及解决临床问题的整体诊断信心(无法/部分能够/完全能够)。辐射暴露从剂量报告中提取。通过 Student's t 检验、Mann-Whitney-U 检验或卡方检验评估两组之间的差异。在 320 名参与者中,有 233 名选择了仅水。两组之间的所有基线特征、腹部图像质量和器官的诊断信心均具有可比性,且两名观察者的结果一致。观察者 1 更常将仅水组的诊断信心评为不佳。结果如下:胃肠道系统(18/233 比 1/87;p=0.031)、腹膜(21/233 比 1/87;p=0.012)、腹膜后(11/233 比 0/87;p=0.040)和淋巴结(11/233 比 0/87;p=0.040)。观察者 2 认为两组之间这些结构的评分具有可比性。在 6/233 名患者中可以部分解决诊断问题的信心,而在 87/87 名患者中可以解决诊断问题的信心(p=0.259)。仅水组的辐射暴露量呈下降趋势。总之,阳性对比剂和仅水组的大多数扫描评分具有可比性,但对于一名观察者而言,某些腹部结构稍微倾向于阳性口服对比剂。因此,在大多数接受腹部 CT 检查的门诊患者中,仅水可以替代阳性口服对比剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff80/7176630/d0cbb520f63a/41598_2020_63838_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

4
Oral contrast agents for CT of abdominal trauma in pediatric patients: a comparison of dilute hypaque and water.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Jun;182(6):1555-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.182.6.1821555.
6
CT for Acute Nontraumatic Abdominal Pain-Is Oral Contrast Really Required?
Acad Radiol. 2017 Jul;24(7):840-845. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
9
Balancing Radiation and Contrast Media Dose in Single-Pass Abdominal Multidetector CT: Prospective Evaluation of Image Quality.
Acad Radiol. 2015 Nov;22(11):1419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.06.016. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
10
Evaluation of neutral oral contrast agents for assessment of the small bowel at abdominal staging CT.
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 14;14(11):e0225160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225160. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral CT Contrast Agents: What's New and Why, From the Special Series on Contrast Media.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2024 Oct;223(4):e2329970. doi: 10.2214/AJR.23.29970. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
2
Tackling the increasing contamination of the water supply by iodinated contrast media.
Insights Imaging. 2022 Feb 24;13(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01175-x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验