Via-Clavero Gemma, Guàrdia-Olmos Joan, Falcó-Pegueroles Anna, Gil-Castillejos Diana, Lobo-Cívico Anna, De La Cueva-Ariza Laura, Romero-García Marta, Delgado-Hito Pilar
Intensive Care Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Crtra, Feixa Llarga s/n. L 'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Fundamental Care and Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Pavelló de Govern, 3ºpl. 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Nursing Research Group (GRIN), Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Av. Gran Via, 199, 08908, L 'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Social Psychology and Quantitative Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Institute of Neuroscience (UB), Institute of Complex Systems (UB), Campus Mundet, Edifici de Ponent, 4ºpl. Pg de La Vall D'Hebron, 171, Barcelona, 08035, Spain; Research Group of Quantitative Psychology, Universitat de Barcelona, Campus Mundet, Edifici de Ponent 4a pl. Pg. Vall d'Hebron 171, Barcelona, 08035, Spain.
Aust Crit Care. 2020 Sep;33(5):426-435. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2019.09.003. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
Studies addressing critical care nurses' practices regarding physical restraints have focused on individual nurses' knowledge and attitudes but lack the understanding of other social influences that could affect nurses' intentions to use them.
The objective of this study was to determine critical care nurses' attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, and intentions to use physical restraints in intubated patients and the relationship between them and sociodemographic, professional, and contextual factors using a survey approach.
A cross-sectional, multicentre study was conducted in a convenience sample of 12 intensive care units from eight hospitals in Spain (n = 354). The Physical Restraint-Theory of Planned Behaviour questionnaire and a researcher-developed survey were used to collect structural and clinical data from each unit. Multilevel model analysis was used.
Critical care nurses showed a moderate level of intention to use physical restraints 12.52 (standard deviation = 3.81) [3-21]. More than a half (52%) agreed restraints were safe. The highest perceived barrier against physical restraint use was patient cooperation. Although nurses did not feel that others expected them to use restraints, they did not perceive high levels of disapproval of such practice. Nurses who had received previous training on restraints and who worked in units with a flexible family visitation policy, an informed consent form for restraint use, analgosedation and restraint protocols, and nurse-driven analgosedation management reported lower levels of intention to use restraints. Working in smaller units (beta -1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.18, -3.44) and working in units with a consent form for restraint use (beta -4.82; 95% CI: -2.80, -6.85) were the variables with the highest impact on nurses' intentions to use restraints.
Critical care nurses' intentions to use physical restraints are moderate and are influenced by intrapersonal, patient, and contextual factors. Nurses who work in units with organisational policies and alternatives to restraints demonstrated lower levels of intention to use them.
关于重症护理护士使用身体约束措施的研究主要集中在个体护士的知识和态度上,而缺乏对可能影响护士使用意愿的其他社会影响因素的理解。
本研究的目的是通过调查方法,确定重症护理护士对使用身体约束措施的态度、主观规范、感知行为控制以及对插管患者使用身体约束措施的意愿,以及这些因素与社会人口统计学、专业和情境因素之间的关系。
在西班牙八家医院的12个重症监护病房中选取了一个便利样本进行横断面多中心研究(n = 354)。使用《身体约束 - 计划行为理论问卷》和研究人员编制的调查问卷收集每个病房的结构和临床数据。采用多水平模型分析。
重症护理护士使用身体约束措施的意愿处于中等水平,得分为12.52(标准差 = 3.81)[3 - 21]。超过一半(52%)的人认为约束措施是安全的。使用身体约束措施的最大感知障碍是患者的配合。尽管护士不觉得其他人期望他们使用约束措施,但他们也没有察觉到对这种做法的高度反对。接受过先前约束措施培训且在有灵活家属探视政策、约束使用知情同意书、镇痛镇静和约束方案以及护士主导的镇痛镇静管理的病房工作的护士,报告的使用约束措施的意愿较低。在较小的病房工作(β -1.81;95%置信区间[CI]:-0.18,-3.44)以及在有约束使用同意书的病房工作(β -4.82;95%CI:-2.80,-6.85)是对护士使用约束措施意愿影响最大的变量。
重症护理护士使用身体约束措施的意愿处于中等水平,且受到个人、患者和情境因素的影响。在有组织政策和约束替代措施的病房工作的护士使用约束措施的意愿较低。