Suppr超能文献

颈动脉体瘤切除术中血管重建的管理和结果:60 例回顾性分析。

Management and outcomes of vascular reconstruction in carotid body tumor resection: retrospective analysis of 60 cases.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Hospital, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Aug;277(8):2299-2306. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05975-z. Epub 2020 Apr 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are rare tumors of the head and neck area. We evaluated outcomes after carotid body tumor resection (CBR) requiring vascular reconstruction.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the patients, who underwent CBR in our clinic. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for clinical data, operative details, Shamblin's classification, complications. Comparisons were performed between those undergoing CBR alone and CBR requiring vascular reconstruction (CBR-VASC).

RESULTS

Of the 60 patients, who underwent CBR, 29 (48.3%) underwent vascular reconstruction after the tumor resection. In patients; who underwent carotid endarterectomy and reconstruction of a kinked carotid artery, the blood flow measurements obtained before and after the vascular reconstruction were significantly different. The blood flow measurement parameters obtained before and after the vascular reconstruction were not significantly different in patients undergoing primary repair surgery, patch graft angioplasty, and the use of reversed saphenous vein graft procedures. The overall complication rate was 25% (n = 60) for at least one perioperative problem (CBR 6.4% vs. CBR-VASC 44.8%, p > 0.05). While most patients with Shamblin's class I and II tumors underwent CBR, CBR-VASC was performed more frequently in patients with Shamblin's class III tumors (p = 0.016). The tumor size ( p = 0.016), the volume of intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.002), and the length of hospital stay (p = 0.006) were significantly different between the two groups. The length of the operation time (p = 0.154) and the volume of the postoperative blood drainage (p = 0.122) were not different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The decision for surgical reconstruction should be made by evaluating the carotid artery blood flow before and after CBR. The type of the reconstruction method does not cause differences in the duration of the surgery and does not elevate the complication rates.

摘要

目的

颈动脉体肿瘤(CBTs)是头颈部罕见的肿瘤。我们评估了需要血管重建的颈动脉体肿瘤切除术(CBR)后的结果。

方法

我们回顾性地评估了在我们诊所接受 CBR 的患者。回顾性查阅病历,获取临床资料、手术细节、Shamblin 分类、并发症等信息。比较了单纯 CBR 组和需要血管重建的 CBR 组(CBR-VASC)。

结果

在 60 例接受 CBR 的患者中,29 例(48.3%)在肿瘤切除后需要血管重建。在接受颈动脉内膜切除术和弯曲颈动脉重建的患者中,血管重建前后的血流测量值差异有统计学意义。在接受原发修复手术、补片血管成形术和使用逆向隐静脉移植物的患者中,血管重建前后的血流测量参数差异无统计学意义。至少有一个围手术期问题的总体并发症发生率为 25%(n=60)(CBR 为 6.4%,CBR-VASC 为 44.8%,p>0.05)。虽然大多数 I 级和 II 级 Shamblin 肿瘤患者接受了 CBR,但 III 级 Shamblin 肿瘤患者更常接受 CBR-VASC(p=0.016)。肿瘤大小(p=0.016)、术中失血量(p=0.002)和住院时间(p=0.006)在两组间差异有统计学意义。手术时间(p=0.154)和术后引流量(p=0.122)在两组间无差异。

结论

应通过评估 CBR 前后颈动脉血流来决定是否进行手术重建。重建方法的类型不会导致手术时间的差异,也不会增加并发症的发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验