Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
EuroIntervention. 2021 Apr 2;16(18):e1484-e1495. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00953.
Composite endpoints are commonly used in clinical trials, and time-to-first-event analysis has been the usual standard. Time-to-first-event analysis treats all components of the composite endpoint as having equal severity and is heavily influenced by short-term components. Over the last decade, novel statistical approaches have been introduced to overcome these limitations. We reviewed win ratio analysis, competing risk regression, negative binomial regression, Andersen-Gill regression, and weighted composite endpoint (WCE) analysis. Each method has both advantages and limitations. The advantage of win ratio and WCE analyses is that they take event severity into account by assigning weights to each component of the composite endpoint. These weights should be pre-specified because they strongly influence treatment effect estimates. Negative binomial regression and Andersen-Gill analyses consider all events for each patient -rather than only the first event - and tend to have more statistical power than time-to-first-event analysis. Pre-specified novel statistical methods may enhance our understanding of novel therapy when components vary substantially in severity and timing. These methods consider the specific types of patients, drugs, devices, events, and follow-up duration.
复合终点通常用于临床试验,而首次事件时间分析是常用的标准。首次事件时间分析将复合终点的所有组成部分视为具有同等严重程度,并且受到短期组成部分的严重影响。在过去十年中,已经引入了新的统计方法来克服这些限制。我们回顾了赢率分析、竞争风险回归、负二项回归、Andersen-Gill 回归和加权复合终点 (WCE) 分析。每种方法都有优点和局限性。赢率和 WCE 分析的优点是,它们通过为复合终点的每个组成部分分配权重来考虑事件的严重程度。这些权重应该预先指定,因为它们会强烈影响治疗效果的估计。负二项回归和 Andersen-Gill 分析考虑了每个患者的所有事件,而不仅仅是第一个事件,并且往往比首次事件时间分析具有更高的统计效力。当组成部分在严重程度和时间上有很大差异时,预先指定的新型统计方法可能会增强我们对新型治疗方法的理解。这些方法考虑了特定类型的患者、药物、设备、事件和随访时间。