Peters T K, Daube R, Zerbst E
Institut für Physiologie, Freie Universität Berlin, F.R.G.
J Auton Nerv Syst. 1988 Dec;25(2-3):173-80. doi: 10.1016/0165-1838(88)90022-7.
In search of improved patterns for electrical stimulation of the carotid sinus nerves (CSNs), which is applied therapeutically in patients with previous therapy refractory hypertension or angina pectoris, the timing of stimulation trains within the cardiac cycle was investigated in anesthetized dogs. Blood pressure responses and prolongations of heart beat intervals upon CSNs were analyzed. Electrocardiogram (ECG)-coupled trains of electrical stimuli were applied to bilateral intact CSNs. Pulses of 1 ms duration and the maximal (5-10 V) and 50% maximal stimulus amplitude were applied. The onset of stimulation trains (150 ms long, 15 impulses/train) was delayed from ECG-R-wave synchronous periods in units of 30 ms to maximally 150 ms. The timing of stimulus trains within the cardiac cycle did not influence the responses. Heart rate and blood pressure reductions upon CSNs were entirely dependent on the amplitudes of stimuli. In conclusion, a phase-dependency of such responses to CSNs, supposedly due to coincidence of electrically induced carotid sinus nerve activity with endogenous signals centrally converging from other cardiovascular afferents, could not be supported, using such stimulation trains. The observed responses did not show the known phase-dependency of sensitivity of the sino-atrial node to changes in effernt vagal activity. In experimental and therapeutic electrical CSNs (baropacing) for obtaining stronger cardiovascular responses with similar parameters, a preferential timing of stimuli relative to the cardiac cycle cannot be recommended.
为了寻找改善颈动脉窦神经(CSNs)电刺激模式的方法,该方法已应用于先前治疗难治性高血压或心绞痛患者的治疗中,我们在麻醉犬中研究了心动周期内刺激序列的时机。分析了CSNs刺激后的血压反应和心跳间期延长情况。将心电图(ECG)耦合的电刺激序列施加于双侧完整的CSNs。施加持续时间为1 ms、最大(5 - 10 V)和50%最大刺激幅度的脉冲。刺激序列(150 ms长,15个脉冲/序列)的起始点从ECG - R波同步期开始延迟,以30 ms为单位,最大延迟至150 ms。心动周期内刺激序列的时机不影响反应。CSNs刺激后心率和血压的降低完全取决于刺激幅度。总之,使用这样的刺激序列,无法支持这种对CSNs反应的相位依赖性,推测这是由于电诱导的颈动脉窦神经活动与从其他心血管传入神经中枢汇聚的内源性信号的巧合。观察到的反应并未显示出窦房结对传出迷走神经活动变化敏感性的已知相位依赖性。在用于获得具有相似参数的更强心血管反应的实验性和治疗性CSNs电刺激(压力起搏)中,不建议相对于心动周期优先选择刺激时机。