Institut Ostéo Articulaire Paris Courcelles, Paris, France.
Institut de l'Epaule de Strasbourg 16, allée de la Robertsau, Strasbourg, France.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Sep;29(9):1789-1795. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.100. Epub 2020 May 1.
To date, medical history and dedicated questionnaires are the fastest and easiest way to assess risks of joint metal hypersensitivity. No published studies determined the overall prevalence of hypersensitivity to metals in patients with shoulder pathologies. The purpose of this study was therefore to estimate the prevalence of metal hypersensitivity reported by patients with shoulder pathologies, and to identify patients at risk of joint metal hypersensitivity based on a dedicated questionnaire.
The authors prospectively asked all adult patients consulting for shoulder pathologies between September 2018 and February 2019 at 10 centers to fill in a form. The main outcome was "reported hypersensitivity to metals," comprising belt buckles, coins, earrings, fancy jewelry, keys, leather, metallic buttons, piercings, spectacles, watch bracelets, or zips.
A total of 3217 patients agreed to fill in the survey, aged 55 ± 16 (range, 18-101) with equal proportions of men (51%) and women (49%), and a majority of patients consulting for cuff pathology (55%). A total of 891 (28%) patients had professions considered at risk for metal hypersensitivity. The most frequently reported metal hypersensitivities were fancy jewelry (15%), earrings (13%), and watch bracelets (9%). A total of 629 (20%) patients, of which the vast majority were women, reported hypersensitivity to 1 or more metals.
This survey of 3217 patients identified 20% who reported metal hypersensitivities, though only 2.2% had done patch tests. Matching profiles of those with positive patch tests to those with no patch tests revealed that 9.4% of the total cohort had similar sex and self-reported metal hypersensitivities. Factors associated with a positive patch test were female sex, self-reported cutaneous allergy, and self-reported metal hypersensitivity. The clinical applicability of these estimates remains uncertain as there is insufficient evidence that allergy to metal implants can be predicted by questionnaires or patch tests.
迄今为止,医学史和专门的问卷调查是评估关节金属过敏风险最快、最简单的方法。目前尚无研究确定患有肩部疾病的患者对金属过敏的总体发生率。因此,本研究旨在评估报告患有肩部疾病的患者对金属过敏的发生率,并根据专门的问卷确定具有关节金属过敏风险的患者。
作者前瞻性地要求 2018 年 9 月至 2019 年 2 月在 10 个中心就诊的所有成年肩部疾病患者填写一份表格。主要结果是“报告对金属的过敏”,包括皮带扣、硬币、耳环、花哨的珠宝、钥匙、皮革、金属纽扣、穿孔、眼镜、手表手链或拉链。
共有 3217 名患者同意填写调查,年龄 55±16(范围,18-101)岁,男女比例相等(各占 51%),多数患者为肩袖疾病就诊(55%)。共有 891 名(28%)患者的职业被认为有金属过敏的风险。报告的最常见金属过敏是花哨的珠宝(15%)、耳环(13%)和手表手链(9%)。共有 629 名(20%)患者报告对 1 种或多种金属过敏,其中绝大多数是女性。
这项对 3217 名患者的调查发现,有 20%的患者报告了金属过敏,但只有 2.2%的患者进行了斑贴试验。将阳性斑贴试验和阴性斑贴试验患者的特征进行匹配,发现总队列中有 9.4%的患者具有相似的性别和自我报告的金属过敏。阳性斑贴试验的相关因素是女性、自我报告的皮肤过敏和自我报告的金属过敏。由于没有足够的证据表明金属植入物过敏可以通过问卷或斑贴试验预测,这些估计的临床适用性仍然不确定。