Tanabe Hidenori, Kawasaki Manami, Ueda Takehiko, Yokota Takayuki, Zushi Yasunobu, Murayama Ryoko, Abe-Doi Mari, Sanada Hiromi
Department of Advanced Nursing Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Research and Development Center, Terumo Corporation, Ashigarakami-gun, Japan.
J Vasc Access. 2020 Nov;21(6):969-976. doi: 10.1177/1129729820920108. Epub 2020 May 6.
Peripheral intravenous catheter placement is frequently unsuccessful at the first attempt. One suggested risk factor is a small vein size, because of the consequences of mechanical forces generated by the needle tip. We developed short bevel needles with a very thin tip and evaluated their puncture performance in two in vitro models.
Peripheral intravenous catheters with a new needle ground using the lancet method (experimental catheter (L)) or backcut method (experimental catheter (B)) were compared with a conventional peripheral intravenous catheter (Surshield Surflo®) in a penetration force test and a tube puncture test. Penetration forces were measured when peripheral intravenous catheters penetrated a polyethylene sheet. The tube puncture test was used to evaluate whether the peripheral intravenous catheters could puncture a polyvinyl chloride tube at two positions, at the center and at 0.5 mm from the center of the tube.
Mean penetration forces at the needle tip produced by experimental catheters (L) (0.05 N) and (B) (0.04 N) were significantly lower than those produced by the conventional catheter (0.09 N) (p < 0.01). At the catheter tip, mean forces produced by experimental catheter (B) and the conventional catheter were 0.16 N and 0.26 N, respectively (p < 0.05). In the tube puncture test, the frequency at which the conventional catheter punctured the center-shifted site on the tube at an angle of 20° and speed of 50 mm/min was low (40%). In contrast, experimental catheters (L) and (B) were 100% successful at puncturing both the center and center-shifted sites at 20°.
Puncture performance was comparable between the lancet-ground and backcut-ground needles except for penetration forces at the catheter tip. The experimental catheters produced lower penetration forces and induced puncture without target displacement at smaller angles compared with the conventional catheter. Therefore, optimization of the needle can prevent vein deformation and movement, which may increase the first-attempt success rate.
外周静脉导管置入首次尝试时常常不成功。一个推测的风险因素是静脉管径小,这是由于针尖产生的机械力所致。我们研发了针尖非常细的短斜面针,并在两种体外模型中评估了它们的穿刺性能。
在穿刺力测试和导管穿刺测试中,将采用柳叶刀方法磨制新针的外周静脉导管(实验导管(L))或回切方法磨制新针的外周静脉导管(实验导管(B))与传统外周静脉导管(Surshield Surflo®)进行比较。当外周静脉导管穿透聚乙烯片时测量穿刺力。导管穿刺测试用于评估外周静脉导管能否在距管中心0.5毫米处及管中心这两个位置穿刺聚氯乙烯管。
实验导管(L)(0.05牛)和(B)(0.04牛)在针尖处产生的平均穿刺力显著低于传统导管(0.09牛)(p<0.01)。在导管尖端,实验导管(B)和传统导管产生的平均力分别为0.16牛和0.26牛(p<0.05)。在导管穿刺测试中,传统导管以20°角、50毫米/分钟的速度穿刺管上中心偏移部位的频率较低(40%)。相比之下,实验导管(L)和(B)在20°时穿刺中心和中心偏移部位均100%成功。
除导管尖端的穿刺力外,柳叶刀磨制针和回切磨制针的穿刺性能相当。与传统导管相比,实验导管产生的穿刺力更低,且能在较小角度下诱导穿刺而无目标移位。因此,优化针头可防止静脉变形和移动,这可能会提高首次尝试的成功率。