Leicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2020 Oct;54(5):280-293. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2020.1762918. Epub 2020 May 7.
A general body of evidence suggests that low serum albumin might be associated with increased risk of adverse cardiometabolic outcomes, but findings are divergent. We aimed to quantify associations of serum albumin with the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D), cardiovascular disease (CVD), all-cause mortality, and other adverse outcomes using a systematic review and meta-analyses of published observational cohort studies. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and manual search of relevant bibliographies were systematically searched to January 2020. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing top versus bottom thirds of serum albumin levels were pooled. Fifty-four articles based on 48 unique observational cohort studies comprising of 1,492,237 participants were eligible. Multivariable adjusted RRs (95% CIs) comparing the top vs bottom third of serum albumin levels were: 1.03 (0.86-1.22) for T2D; 0.60 (0.53-0.67) for CVD; 0.74 (0.66-0.84) for coronary heart disease (CHD); 0.57 (0.36-0.91) for CHD death; 0.76 (0.65-0.87) for myocardial infarction; 0.66 (0.55-0.77) for all-cause mortality; 0.71 (0.61-0.83) for venous thromboembolism; 0.65 (0.48-0.88) for cancer mortality; and 0.62 (0.46-0.84) for fracture. Heterogeneity between contributing studies of T2D was partly explained by sample sizes of studies ( for meta-regression = .035). Elevated levels of serum albumin are associated with reduced risk of vascular outcomes, all-cause mortality, certain cancers, and fracture. Inconsistent findings for T2D may be attributed to selective reporting by studies. Further research is needed to assess any potential causal relevance to these findings and the role of serum albumin concentrations in disease prevention.: PROSPERO 2019: CRD42019125869.
大量证据表明,血清白蛋白水平较低可能与不良心血管代谢结局的风险增加有关,但研究结果存在差异。我们旨在通过系统评价和荟萃分析已发表的观察性队列研究,定量评估血清白蛋白与 2 型糖尿病(T2D)、心血管疾病(CVD)、全因死亡率和其他不良结局的相关性。我们系统地检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science 和相关文献的手动搜索,检索时间截至 2020 年 1 月。比较血清白蛋白水平最高和最低三分之一的相对风险(RRs)和 95%置信区间(CIs)被汇总。54 篇文章基于 48 项独立的观察性队列研究,共纳入 1492237 名参与者,符合条件。比较血清白蛋白水平最高和最低三分之一的多变量调整 RR(95%CI)分别为:T2D:1.03(0.86-1.22);CVD:0.60(0.53-0.67);冠心病(CHD):0.74(0.66-0.84);CHD 死亡:0.57(0.36-0.91);心肌梗死:0.76(0.65-0.87);全因死亡率:0.66(0.55-0.77);静脉血栓栓塞症:0.71(0.61-0.83);癌症死亡率:0.65(0.48-0.88);骨折:0.62(0.46-0.84)。T2D 相关研究之间的异质性部分可以通过研究的样本量来解释(meta-回归=0.035)。血清白蛋白水平升高与血管结局、全因死亡率、某些癌症和骨折风险降低有关。T2D 不一致的发现可能归因于研究的选择性报告。需要进一步的研究来评估这些发现的潜在因果关系以及血清白蛋白浓度在疾病预防中的作用。PROSPERO 2019:CRD42019125869。