Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Urol Oncol. 2020 Aug;38(8):685.e17-685.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.03.030. Epub 2020 May 4.
To evaluate the expression pattern and prognostic role of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) system in patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for nonmetastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).
A total of 732 patients who were treated with RNU for clinically nonmetastatic UTUC comprised our analytical cohort. Immunohistochemical staining of uPA, uPA receptor (uPAR) and uPA inhibitor (PAI-1) was performed using Murine IgG1 monoclonal antibodies. Outcomes of interest were recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival.
The median age of the patients was 69.8 years and 56.6% of them were males. Overall, overexpression of uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 was observed in 292 (39.9%), 346 (47.3%), and 345 (47.1%) patients, respectively. The uPA system components showed a statistically significant association with adverse clinicopathologic features such as lymphovascular invasion, multifocality, sessile tumors, and advanced pathologic stage (P < 0.01). On multivariable models, higher pathologic tumor stage, multifocality, and lymph node involvement were associated with RFS, OS, and CSS, but not the overexpression of uPA, uPAR, or PAR-1. In patients with organ-confined disease (≤pT2N0), however, uPA was significantly associated with RFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21-3.43), OS (HR: 1.59, 95% CI:1.08-2.24) and CSS (HR: 2.55, 95% CI:1.44-4.52). uPA improved the predictive accuracy of a standard post-RNU model for all 3 endpoints, in organ-confined disease, by a prognostically significant margin.
Overexpression of uPA system components was associated with adverse clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes on the univariable, but not multivariable analyses. uPA expression was an independent predictor of survival outcomes in patients with organ-confined disease. While the clinical value of the uPA system remains limited in this cohort, further studies are needed to identify a marker or constellation of markers of high predictive value to help in counseling and treatment planning of UTUC patients.
评估尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物(uPA)系统在接受根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)治疗非转移性上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)患者中的表达模式和预后作用。
本分析队列纳入了 732 例接受 RNU 治疗的临床非转移性 UTUC 患者。使用鼠 IgG1 单克隆抗体进行 uPA、uPA 受体(uPAR)和 uPA 抑制剂(PAI-1)的免疫组织化学染色。研究的终点为无复发生存率、癌症特异性生存率和总生存率。
患者的中位年龄为 69.8 岁,其中 56.6%为男性。总体而言,292 例(39.9%)、346 例(47.3%)和 345 例(47.1%)患者的 uPA、uPAR 和 PAI-1 表达过度。uPA 系统成分与不良临床病理特征如淋巴血管侵犯、多灶性、息肉状肿瘤和晚期病理分期显著相关(P<0.01)。在多变量模型中,较高的病理肿瘤分期、多灶性和淋巴结受累与 RFS、OS 和 CSS 相关,但与 uPA、uPAR 或 PAR-1 的表达过度无关。然而,在器官局限性疾病(≤pT2N0)患者中,uPA 与 RFS(风险比 [HR]:2.04,95%置信区间 [CI]:1.21-3.43)、OS(HR:1.59,95% CI:1.08-2.24)和 CSS(HR:2.55,95% CI:1.44-4.52)显著相关。uPA 提高了器官局限性疾病中所有 3 个终点的标准 RNU 后模型的预测准确性,且具有显著的预后意义。
uPA 系统成分的过度表达与单变量分析中的不良临床病理特征和生存结果相关,但在多变量分析中不相关。uPA 表达是器官局限性疾病患者生存结果的独立预测因子。尽管 uPA 系统在该队列中的临床价值有限,但需要进一步研究以确定具有高预测价值的标志物或标志物组合,以帮助 UTUC 患者的咨询和治疗计划。