Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture & College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
PLoS One. 2020 May 8;15(5):e0231688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231688. eCollection 2020.
Effective sampling of marine communities is essential to provide robust estimates of species richness and abundance. Baited Remote Underwater Video Stations (BRUVS) are a useful tool in assessment of fish assemblages, but research on the optimal sampling period required to record common and rare elasmobranch species is limited. An appropriate 'soak time' (time elapsed between settlement of the BRUVS on the seabed and when it is hauled off the seabed) requires consideration, since longer soak times may be required to record species rare in occurrence, or sightings in areas of generally low elasmobranch abundance. We analysed 5352 BRUVS deployments with a range of soak times across 21 countries in the Coral Triangle and Pacific Ocean, to determine the optimal soak time required for sampling reef-associated elasmobranchs, considering species rarity, and community abundance at each site. Species were categorised into 4 'rarity' groups (very rare to common), by their relative occurrence in the dataset, defined simply by the proportion of BRUVS on which they occurred. Individual BRUVS were categorised into 3 'abundance' groups (low to high) by overall relative elasmobranch abundance, defined as total number of all elasmobranchs sighted per unit of sampling effort. The effects of BRUVS soak times, and levels of rarity and abundance groupings, on the time to first sighting (TFS) and time to maximum number of elasmobranchs observed (tMaxN) were examined. We found that TFS occurred earlier for species groups with high occurrence, and on BRUVS with high elasmobranch abundance, yet longer soak times were not essential to observe rarer species. Our models indicated an optimum of 95% of both sighting event types (TFS, tMaxN) was recorded within 63-77 minutes, and a soak time of 60 minutes recorded 78-94% of the elasmobranch sighting events recorded (78-94% of TFS events and 82-90% of tMaxN events), when species rarity and abundance on BRUVS was accounted for. Our study shows that deployments of ~ 77 minutes are optimal for recording all species we observed, although 60 minutes soak time effectively samples the majority of elasmobranch species in shallow coral reef habitats using BRUVS.
有效的海洋生物群落采样对于提供物种丰富度和数量的可靠估计至关重要。诱捕式水下视频站(BRUVS)是评估鱼类群落的有用工具,但关于记录常见和稀有鲨鱼物种所需的最佳采样时间的研究有限。需要考虑适当的“浸泡时间”(BRUVS 沉降在海底和被吊起离开海底之间的时间),因为较长的浸泡时间可能需要记录出现频率较低的物种,或在鲨鱼数量普遍较低的区域进行观察。我们分析了在珊瑚三角区和太平洋的 21 个国家进行的 5352 次 BRUVS 部署,考虑了每个站点的物种稀有性和群落丰度,以确定采样珊瑚礁相关鲨鱼所需的最佳浸泡时间。根据数据集中的相对出现频率,通过简单地定义它们在 BRUVS 上出现的比例,将物种分为 4 个“稀有”组(非常稀有到常见)。个体 BRUVS 按总体相对鲨鱼丰度分为 3 个“丰度”组(低到高),定义为单位采样量中观察到的所有鲨鱼的总数。我们考察了 BRUVS 浸泡时间,以及稀有和丰度分组的水平对首次观察时间(TFS)和最大观察鲨鱼数量时间(tMaxN)的影响。我们发现,高出现频率的物种组和高鲨鱼丰度的 BRUVS 上的 TFS 发生得更早,但观察到更稀有的物种并不需要更长的浸泡时间。我们的模型表明,在 63-77 分钟内记录了两种观察事件类型(TFS,tMaxN)的 95%的最佳值,而当考虑到 BRUVS 上的物种稀有性和丰度时,60 分钟的浸泡时间记录了 78-94%的鲨鱼观察事件(78-94%的 TFS 事件和 82-90%的 tMaxN 事件)。我们的研究表明,对于记录我们观察到的所有物种,部署约 77 分钟是最佳的,尽管在使用 BRUVS 时,60 分钟的浸泡时间可以有效地在浅珊瑚礁栖息地中采样大多数鲨鱼物种。