Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
BJU Int. 2020 Aug;126(2):256-258. doi: 10.1111/bju.15109. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
To compare the number of patients attending the Urology Emergency Department (ED) of the Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUP), as well as their demographic characteristics, the reasons for admission, the clinical severity under the Manchester triage system (MTS), and the need for emergency surgery or hospitalisation, during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the equivalent period in 2019.
Data were collected from patients attending the Urology ED of the CHUP over 3 weeks, from 11 March to 1 April 2020, and from the same period in the previous year (from 11 March to 1 April 2019).
During the pandemic, 46.4% fewer patients visited our urological ED (122 vs 263). There was no significant difference in the mean age or the number of old patients (aged ≥65 years) between the two periods. However, significantly fewer female patients sought emergency urological services during the COVID-19 pandemic period (32.7% vs 14.8%, P < 0.05). No significant differences were noted between different clinical severity groups under the MTS. In 2019, significantly less patients required hospitalisation. The most common reasons for admission, during both periods, were haematuria, renal colic and urinary tract infections. The authors recognise that the study has several limitations, namely, those inherent to its retrospective nature.
COVID-19 significantly influenced people's urological care-seeking behaviour. Understanding the present situation is helpful for predicting future urological needs. Based on the results of this study, we have reason to speculate that people's requirements for urological services might grow explosively in the post-COVID-19 period. There should be further studies about the real state of long-term urological services and the consequences that this pandemic may have in terms of morbimortality not directly related to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
比较 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间和 2019 年同期在波尔图大学医院泌尿外科急诊就诊的患者人数及其人口统计学特征、入院原因、曼彻斯特分诊系统(MTS)下的临床严重程度,以及是否需要急诊手术或住院治疗。
收集了 2020 年 3 月 11 日至 4 月 1 日的 3 周内以及 2019 年同期(3 月 11 日至 4 月 1 日)在波尔图大学医院泌尿外科急诊就诊的患者数据。
大流行期间,来我院泌尿外科就诊的患者减少了 46.4%(122 人 vs 263 人)。两个时期的患者平均年龄和老年患者(年龄≥65 岁)数量没有显著差异。然而,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,寻求紧急泌尿外科服务的女性患者明显减少(32.7% vs 14.8%,P<0.05)。MTS 下不同临床严重程度组之间无显著差异。2019 年,住院患者明显减少。两个时期最常见的入院原因是血尿、肾绞痛和尿路感染。作者承认该研究存在一些局限性,即其回顾性研究的固有局限性。
COVID-19 显著影响了人们对泌尿外科的就医行为。了解当前的情况有助于预测未来的泌尿外科需求。基于这项研究的结果,我们有理由推测,在 COVID-19 之后,人们对泌尿外科服务的需求可能会爆发式增长。应该进一步研究长期泌尿外科服务的真实状况,以及这种大流行在与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 无关的发病率和死亡率方面可能产生的后果。