Suppr超能文献

皮下植入式心律转复除颤器植入患者新出现起搏需求时的希氏束起搏:基于自动筛查评分和临床病例的可行性研究

His bundle pacing for newly acquired pacing needs in patients implanted with a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator: A feasibility study based on the automated screening score and clinical cases.

作者信息

Gauthey Anaïs, Calle Simon, Accinelli Stefano, Depuydt Philippe, Garnir Quentin, Scavée Christophe, Marchandise Sébastien, Wauters Aurélien, Bordachar Pierre, de Pooter Jan, le Polain de Waroux Jean-Benoît

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Heart Center, Gent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Jul;31(7):1793-1800. doi: 10.1111/jce.14566. Epub 2020 May 29.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Management of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) patients with newly acquired pacing needs remains problematic. His bundle pacing (HBP) allows for cardiac pacing without significant changes in the QRS morphology. We hypothesized that HBP does not alter S-ICD sensing and functions.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients were implanted with a HB pacemaker. Among them, 17 demonstrated successful His recruitment and were prospectively screened with the automated screening tool (AST). Results of screenings performed immediately after implant and during follow-up, during intrinsic rhythm and while pacing from all available pacing configurations, were compared using the AST score. Positive-screening tests were defined by greater than or equal to 1 positive vector.

RESULTS

Among the 17 patients successfully implanted (male: 41%; mean age: 73), 13 presented an indication of ventricular pacing and four of cardiac resynchronization. Absolute AST scores during both HBP (all configurations) and intrinsic rhythm were similar (p: NS). Due to left bundle branch block correction, HBP resulted in higher number of positive vectors (AST ≥ 100). AST scores were higher during HBP when compared with right ventricular pacing (RVP) (primary vector: 272 [16; 648] vs 4.6 [0.8; 16.2]; P = .003; secondary vector: 569 [183; 1186] vs 1.5 [0.7; 8.3]; P < .0001; alternate vector: 44 [2;125] vs 4.8 [0.9; 9.3]; P = .02) and resulted in a much higher number of positive vectors. Up to 90% of the patients had a positive-screening test during HBP. This passing rate was higher when compared RVP (17%; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

HBP restores normal intrinsic conduction and minimally modifies the surface electrocardiograph and subcutaneous electrograms. When ventricular pacing is needed, HBP might represent an ideal pacing option for patients implanted with a S-ICD.

摘要

引言

对于有新出现起搏需求的皮下植入式心律转复除颤器(S-ICD)患者,其管理仍存在问题。希氏束起搏(HBP)可实现心脏起搏,且QRS形态无显著变化。我们推测HBP不会改变S-ICD的感知和功能。

方法

连续20例患者植入了希氏束起搏器。其中,17例成功实现希氏束夺获,并使用自动筛查工具(AST)进行前瞻性筛查。比较植入后即刻、随访期间、固有心律时以及从所有可用起搏配置进行起搏时使用AST评分进行的筛查结果。阳性筛查试验定义为大于或等于1个阳性向量。

结果

在成功植入的17例患者中(男性:41%;平均年龄:73岁),13例有心室起搏指征,4例有心脏再同步化指征。HBP(所有配置)期间和固有心律时的绝对AST评分相似(p:无显著性差异)。由于左束支传导阻滞得到纠正,HBP导致阳性向量数量增加(AST≥100)。与右心室起搏(RVP)相比,HBP期间的AST评分更高(主要向量:272 [16;648] 对4.6 [0.8;16.2];P = 0.003;次要向量:569 [183;1186] 对1.5 [0.7;8.3];P < 0.0001;交替向量:44 [2;125] 对4.8 [0.9;9.3];P = 0.02),并导致阳性向量数量多得多。高达90%的患者在HBP期间有阳性筛查试验。与RVP相比,该通过率更高(17%;P < 0.0001)。

结论

HBP可恢复正常的固有传导,并对体表心电图和皮下电图的改变最小。当需要心室起搏时,HBP可能是植入S-ICD患者的理想起搏选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验