• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉支架置入术后双联抗血小板治疗:大型国家数据库中的趋势和结局。

Dual antiplatelet therapy after carotid artery stenting: trends and outcomes in a large national database.

机构信息

Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA

Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Jan;13(1):8-13. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016008. Epub 2020 May 15.

DOI:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016008
PMID:32414894
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While dual antiplatelet therapy (dAPT) is standard of care following carotid artery stenting (CAS), the optimal dAPT regimen and duration has not been established.

METHODS

We canvassed a large national database (IBM MarketScan) to identify patients receiving carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or CAS for treatment of ischemic stroke or carotid artery stenosis from 2007 to 2016. We performed univariable and multivariable regression methods to evaluate the impact of covariates on post-CAS stroke-free survival, including post-discharge antiplatelet therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 79 084 patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke or carotid stenosis received CEA (71 178; 90.0%) or CAS (7906; 10.0%). After adjusting for covariates, <180 days prescribed post-CAS P2Y12-inhibition was associated with increased risk for stroke (<90 prescribed days HR=1.421, 95% CI 1.038 to 1.946; 90-179 prescribed days HR=1.484, 95% CI 1.045 to 2.106). The incidence of hemorrhagic complications was higher during the period of prescribed P2Y12-inhibition (1.16% per person-month vs 0.49% per person-month after discontinuation, P<0.001). The rate of extracranial hemorrhage was nearly six-fold higher while on dAPT (6.50% per patient-month vs 1.16% per patient-month, P<0.001), and there was a trend towards higher rate of intracranial hemorrhage that did not reach statistical significance (5.09% per patient-month vs 3.69% per patient-month, P=0.0556). Later hemorrhagic events beyond 30 days post-CAS were significantly more likely to be extracranial (P=0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased duration of post-CAS dAPT is associated with lower rates of readmissions for stroke, and with increased risk of hemorrhagic complications, particularly extracranial hemorrhage. The potential benefit of prolonging dAPT with regard to ischemic complications must be balanced with the corresponding increased risk of predominantly extracranial hemorrhagic complications.

摘要

背景

虽然在颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)后进行双联抗血小板治疗(dAPT)是标准的治疗方法,但最佳的 dAPT 方案和持续时间尚未确定。

方法

我们调查了一个大型的全国性数据库(IBM MarketScan),以确定 2007 年至 2016 年期间因缺血性卒中和颈动脉狭窄而接受颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)或 CAS 治疗的患者。我们使用单变量和多变量回归方法评估了围手术期抗血小板治疗对 CAS 后无卒中生存的影响。

结果

共纳入 79084 例诊断为缺血性卒中和颈动脉狭窄的患者,其中 71178 例(90.0%)接受了 CEA,7906 例(10.0%)接受了 CAS。调整混杂因素后,CAS 后接受的 P2Y12 抑制剂治疗时间<180 天与卒中风险增加相关(<90 天处方 HR=1.421,95%CI 1.038 至 1.946;90-179 天处方 HR=1.484,95%CI 1.045 至 2.106)。在接受 P2Y12 抑制剂治疗期间,出血并发症的发生率更高(每患者月 1.16% vs. 停药后每患者月 0.49%,P<0.001)。在接受 dAPT 治疗时,颅外出血的发生率几乎高出六倍(每患者月 6.50% vs. 每患者月 1.16%,P<0.001),颅内出血的发生率虽呈上升趋势,但无统计学意义(每患者月 5.09% vs. 每患者月 3.69%,P=0.0556)。CAS 后 30 天以上的迟发性出血事件更有可能是颅外出血(P=0.028)。

结论

延长 CAS 后 dAPT 的持续时间与较低的卒中再入院率相关,并且出血并发症的风险增加,尤其是颅外出血。延长 dAPT 对缺血性并发症的潜在益处必须与主要为颅外出血并发症的相应增加风险相平衡。

相似文献

1
Dual antiplatelet therapy after carotid artery stenting: trends and outcomes in a large national database.颈动脉支架置入术后双联抗血小板治疗:大型国家数据库中的趋势和结局。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Jan;13(1):8-13. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016008. Epub 2020 May 15.
2
Efficacy of cilostazol-based dual antiplatelet treatment in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting.西洛他唑双重抗血小板治疗在接受颈动脉支架置入术患者中的疗效
Neurol Res. 2017 Aug;39(8):695-701. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2017.1301042. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
3
Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with prior ipsilateral carotid artery stenting.既往同侧颈动脉支架置入患者行内膜切除术与支架置入术的比较
J Vasc Surg. 2017 May;65(5):1418-1428. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.041. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
4
Thirty-Day Readmissions After Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Endarterectomy: Analysis of the 2013-2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database.颈动脉支架置入术与内膜切除术治疗后 30 天内再入院情况分析:2013-2014 年全国再入院数据库分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr;13(4):e008508. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008508. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
5
Outcome differences between carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in postoperative ventricular arrhythmia, neurological complications, and in-hospital mortality.颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)与颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)术后室性心律失常、神经并发症和住院死亡率的结果差异。
Postgrad Med. 2020 Nov;132(8):756-763. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2020.1768765. Epub 2020 May 20.
6
Primary carotid artery stenting versus carotid artery stenting for postcarotid endarterectomy stenosis.原发性颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术后狭窄的颈动脉支架置入术对比
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Nov;50(5):1031-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.06.051. Epub 2009 Aug 22.
7
Efficacy and safety of single versus dual antiplatelet therapy in carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术中单药与双联抗血小板治疗的疗效和安全性。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 May;77(5):1434-1446.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.12.034. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
8
Different perioperative antiplatelet therapies for patients treated with carotid endarterectomy in routine practice.常规实践中接受颈动脉内膜切除术患者的不同围手术期抗血小板治疗。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Dec;68(6):1753-1763. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.063. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
9
Comparison of Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes of Concurrent Carotid Artery Revascularization and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: The United States Experience 2004 to 2012.比较 2004 年至 2012 年美国同期颈动脉血运重建术和冠状动脉旁路移植术的趋势和院内结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 13;10(3):286-298. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.032.
10
Stenting versus endarterectomy after prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy.既往同侧颈动脉内膜剥脱术后支架置入术与内膜剥脱术的比较
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan;65(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.115. Epub 2016 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Cerebrovascular accidents - Unexpected complication of systemic sclerosis: A scarce case report.脑血管意外——系统性硬化症的意外并发症:一例罕见病例报告
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Sep 5;104(36):e44331. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044331.
2
Antithrombotic Therapy in Carotid Artery and Intracranial Artery Stent.颈动脉和颅内动脉支架置入术中的抗栓治疗
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2025;19(1). doi: 10.5797/jnet.ra.2024-0014. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
3
CIRSE Standards of Practice on Carotid Artery Stenting.经皮颈动脉支架置入术 CIRSE 实践标准
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024 Jun;47(6):705-716. doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03707-y. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
4
Hemorrhagic Transformation of Ischemic Strokes.缺血性卒中的出血性转化
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Sep 14;24(18):14067. doi: 10.3390/ijms241814067.
5
Case report: Usefulness of angioscopy in determining antiplatelet drug reduction after carotid artery stenting.病例报告:血管内超声在确定颈动脉支架置入术后抗血小板药物减量中的应用价值
Front Neurol. 2023 Sep 4;14:1152173. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1152173. eCollection 2023.
6
Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Look Into the Diagnostic and Management Strategies, and Related Complications.颈动脉狭窄:诊断与管理策略及相关并发症探讨
Cureus. 2023 May 9;15(5):e38794. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38794. eCollection 2023 May.
7
Association between lipid profile changes and risk of in-stent restenosis in ischemic stroke patients with intracranial stenosis: A retrospective cohort study.颅内狭窄缺血性脑卒中患者血脂谱变化与支架内再狭窄风险的相关性:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 May 10;18(5):e0284749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284749. eCollection 2023.
8
Prediction of Bleeding by the PRECISE-DAPT Score in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenting.颈动脉支架置入术患者 PRECISE-DAPT 评分预测出血风险。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 May;46(5):574-578. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03419-9. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
9
Use of drug-eluting, balloon-expandable resolute onyx coronary stent as a novel treatment strategy for vertebral artery ostial stenosis: Case series.药物洗脱、球囊扩张的 resolute onyx 冠状动脉支架作为椎动脉开口狭窄的新型治疗策略:病例系列。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Aug;30(4):443-450. doi: 10.1177/15910199221138138. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
10
Antithrombotic Treatment after Carotid Stenting in Patients with Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation.伴有房颤的颈动脉支架置入术后抗栓治疗。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022 May;43(5):727-730. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7482. Epub 2022 Apr 7.