Suppr超能文献

腘动脉以下介入治疗中的最佳血管尺寸与夹层理解:来自膝下iDissection研究的数据

Optimal Vessel Sizing and Understanding Dissections in Infrapopliteal Interventions: Data From the iDissection Below the Knee Study.

作者信息

Shammas Nicolas W, Shammas W John, Jones-Miller Susan, Torey James T, Armstrong Ehrin J, Radaideh Qais, Shammas Gail A

机构信息

Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Davenport, IA, USA.

St John Providence Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Aug;27(4):575-580. doi: 10.1177/1526602820924815. Epub 2020 May 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate if imaging with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) yields a more accurate estimate of vessel diameter and the presence of dissections than angiography after intervention in the infrapopliteal arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective, single-center study enrolled 20 consecutive patients (mean age 74.1±12.4 years; 12 women) with infrapopliteal disease who were treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA; n=10) or orbital atherectomy (OA) followed by PTA (n=10). The majority of patients were hypertensive and half were diabetic. The overall lesion length was 7.3±6.3 cm, and the diameter stenosis was 80.3%±22.1%. The baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups. Vessel diameters were measured using IVUS from the internal elastic lamina (IEL) to the IEL. IVUS was performed at baseline, post PTA or OA, and post OA+PTA. Quantitative vascular angiography (QVA) and IVUS were analyzed by a core laboratory. Dissections on cine images were categorized based on the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) classification, while the arc and depth were used to characterize dissections on IVUS images.

RESULTS

Mean vessel diameter by QVA was 2.9±0.6 vs 4.0±1.0 mm by IVUS according to the core laboratory (mean difference 1.1±0.9, p<0.001). On angiography, there were 7 dissections after PTA (6 C, 1 D), 1 dissection after OA (1 B), and 2 dissections after OA+PTA (1 A, 1 B; p=0.028 vs post PTA). IVUS uncovered 3.8 times more dissections than seen on angiography. There were 23 dissections after PTA (18 intima, 3 media, 2 adventitia), 12 dissections after OA (8 intima, 1 media, 3 adventitia), and 11 dissections following OA+PTA (7 intima, 1 media, 3 adventitia; p=0.425 vs PTA). Bailout stenting (all due to angiographic dissections ≥C) was necessary in 6 of the PTA cohort and none of the OA+PTA group.

CONCLUSION

In addition to underestimating the infrapopliteal vessel diameter by ~25%, angiography underappreciated the presence and severity of post-intervention dissections vs IVUS, particularly in the OA+PTA group.

摘要

目的

研究在腘下动脉介入治疗后,血管内超声(IVUS)成像在评估血管直径和夹层存在情况方面是否比血管造影更准确。

材料与方法

一项前瞻性单中心研究纳入了20例连续的患有腘下疾病的患者(平均年龄74.1±12.4岁;12例女性),这些患者接受了经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA;n = 10)或旋切斑块消蚀术(OA)联合PTA(n = 10)治疗。大多数患者患有高血压,半数患有糖尿病。病变总长度为7.3±6.3 cm,直径狭窄率为80.3%±22.1%。两组的基线特征无差异。使用IVUS从内弹性膜(IEL)到IEL测量血管直径。在基线、PTA或OA术后以及OA + PTA术后进行IVUS检查。定量血管造影(QVA)和IVUS由核心实验室进行分析。电影图像上的夹层根据美国国立心肺血液研究所(NHLBI)分类进行归类,而IVUS图像上的夹层用弧度和深度来表征。

结果

根据核心实验室的数据,QVA测得的平均血管直径为2.9±0.6 mm,而IVUS测得的为4.0±1.0 mm(平均差值1.1±0.9,p < 0.001)。在血管造影中,PTA术后有7例夹层(6例C级,1例D级),OA术后有1例夹层(1例B级),OA + PTA术后有2例夹层(1例A级,1例B级;与PTA术后相比,p = 0.028)。IVUS发现的夹层比血管造影多3.8倍。PTA术后有23例夹层(18例内膜,3例中膜,2例外膜),OA术后有12例夹层(8例内膜,1例中膜,3例外膜),OA + PTA术后有11例夹层(7例内膜,1例中膜,3例外膜;与PTA术后相比,p = 0.425)。PTA组中有6例需要补救性支架置入(均因血管造影夹层≥C级),而OA + PTA组无此情况。

结论

除了将腘下血管直径低估约25%外,与IVUS相比,血管造影还低估了介入术后夹层的存在和严重程度,尤其在OA + PTA组中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验