Pedersoli Federico, Zimmermann Markus, Schulze-Hagen Maximilian, Sieben Paul, Barzakova Emona, Goerg Fabian, Keil Sebastian, Gombert Alexander, Kuhl Christiane K, Isfort Peter, Bruners Philipp
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Clinic for Vascular Surgery, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2020 Aug;54(6):477-481. doi: 10.1177/1538574420927132. Epub 2020 May 18.
The antegrade recanalization of an occlusion or high-grade stenosis of the celiac artery via the aorta often represents a technical challenge. A retrograde approach via the superior mesenteric artery and the pancreaticoduodenal arcade may be an alternative approach. Based on our experience, we assess the technical success and the short- and mid-term outcomes of this bailout procedure.
We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent recanalization and stent implantation in the celiac artery between January 2010 and December 2018. Data on vascular access, the materials used including stents, as well as the length of the intervention, radiation exposure, and follow-up were assessed.
Recanalization in combination with stent implantation into the celiac artery was performed in 43 patients. In 39 (91%) of 43 patients, the recanalization was successful with an antegrade approach via the aorta, whereas in 4 (9%) of 43 patients the passage of the stenosis was possible only through a retrograde approach through the superior mesenteric artery and the pancreaticoduodenal arcade followed be advancement of the microwire through the celiac artery into the aorta. The tip of the microwire was captured in the aorta with a snare and pulled out in the femoral introducer sheath and used as a guide for the antegrade implantation of a balloon-expandable stent.
The retrograde recanalization of the celiac artery via the pancreaticoduodenal arcade may be technically challenging yet represents a feasible alternative in case of a failed antegrade approach.
经主动脉对腹腔干闭塞或高度狭窄进行顺行再通术往往是一项技术挑战。经肠系膜上动脉和胰十二指肠动脉弓的逆行入路可能是一种替代方法。基于我们的经验,我们评估了这种补救手术的技术成功率以及短期和中期结果。
我们对2010年1月至2018年12月期间所有连续接受腹腔干再通和支架植入术的患者进行了回顾性分析。评估了血管入路、所用材料(包括支架)以及干预时间、辐射暴露和随访等数据。
43例患者接受了腹腔干再通联合支架植入术。43例患者中有39例(91%)通过经主动脉的顺行入路成功实现再通,而43例患者中有4例(9%)仅通过经肠系膜上动脉和胰十二指肠动脉弓的逆行入路穿过狭窄段,随后将微导丝经腹腔干推进至主动脉。微导丝尖端用圈套器在主动脉中捕获,并从股动脉导入鞘中拉出,用作球囊扩张支架顺行植入的引导。
经胰十二指肠动脉弓对腹腔干进行逆行再通术在技术上可能具有挑战性,但在前向入路失败的情况下是一种可行的替代方法。