Suppr超能文献

评价抗癫痫药物在自发性发作大鼠中的亚慢性给药。

Evaluation of subchronic administration of antiseizure drugs in spontaneously seizing rats.

机构信息

Department, of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Epilepsy Therapy Screening Program, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2020 Jun;61(6):1301-1311. doi: 10.1111/epi.16531. Epub 2020 May 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Approximately 30% of patients with epilepsy do not experience full seizure control on their antiseizure drug (ASD) regimen. Historically, screening for novel ASDs has relied on evaluating efficacy following a single administration of a test compound in either acute electrical or chemical seizure induction. However, the use of animal models of spontaneous seizures and repeated administration of test compounds may better differentiate novel compounds. Therefore, this approach has been instituted as part of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Epilepsy Therapy Screening Program screening paradigm for pharmacoresistant epilepsy.

METHODS

Rats were treated with intraperitoneal kainic acid to induce status epilepticus and subsequent spontaneous recurrent seizures. After 12 weeks, rats were enrolled in drug screening studies. Using a 2-week crossover design, selected ASDs were evaluated for their ability to protect against spontaneous seizures, using a video-electroencephalographic monitoring system and automated seizure detection. Sixteen clinically available compounds were administered at maximally tolerated doses in this model. Dose intervals (1-3 treatments/d) were selected based on known half-lives for each compound.

RESULTS

Carbamazepine (90 mg/kg/d), phenobarbital (30 mg/kg/d), and ezogabine (15 mg/kg/d) significantly reduced seizure burden at the doses evaluated. In addition, a dose-response study of topiramate (20-600 mg/kg/d) demonstrated that this compound reduced seizure burden at both therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses. However, none of the 16 ASDs conferred complete seizure freedom during the testing period at the doses tested.

SIGNIFICANCE

Despite reductions in seizure burden, the lack of full seizure freedom for any ASD tested suggests that this screening paradigm may be useful for testing novel compounds with potential utility in pharmacoresistant epilepsy.

摘要

目的

约 30%的癫痫患者在其抗癫痫药物(ASD)治疗方案中无法完全控制发作。传统上,新型 ASD 的筛选依赖于在单次给予测试化合物后,通过急性电刺激或化学诱导发作来评估其疗效。然而,使用自发性癫痫动物模型和重复给予测试化合物可能更能区分新型化合物。因此,这种方法已被纳入国家神经病学与中风研究所癫痫治疗筛选计划筛选抗药性癫痫的筛选范式。

方法

大鼠腹腔注射海人酸诱发癫痫持续状态和随后的自发性反复性发作。12 周后,大鼠被纳入药物筛选研究。使用 2 周交叉设计,使用视频-脑电图监测系统和自动发作检测,评估选定的 ASD 对自发性发作的保护作用。在该模型中,以最大耐受剂量给予 16 种临床可用的化合物。剂量间隔(1-3 次/天)是根据每个化合物的已知半衰期选择的。

结果

卡马西平(90mg/kg/d)、苯巴比妥(30mg/kg/d)和依佐加滨(15mg/kg/d)在评估的剂量下显著降低了发作负担。此外,托吡酯(20-600mg/kg/d)的剂量反应研究表明,该化合物在治疗和超治疗剂量下均能降低发作负担。然而,在测试期间,在测试的剂量下,没有一种 ASD 能够完全使癫痫发作自由。

意义

尽管发作负担有所减轻,但任何 ASD 测试都未能完全消除癫痫发作,这表明这种筛选范式可能有助于测试对耐药性癫痫有潜在疗效的新型化合物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d81/7383749/c68cf2668b8a/EPI-61-1301-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验