Suppr超能文献

使用 Verona 编码情感序列定义(VR-CoDES)开发和试行情绪处理技能情境判断测验。

Development and piloting of a Situational Judgement Test for emotion-handling skills using the Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VR-CoDES).

机构信息

Institute for Medical Education, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.

Institute for Medical Education, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Sep;103(9):1839-1845. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 May 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Emotion-handling skills are key components for interpersonal communication by medical professionals. The Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VR-CoDES) appears useful to develop a Situational Judgment Test (SJT) for assessing emotion-handling skills.

METHODS

In phase 1 we used a multi-stage process with expert panels (n = 16; n = 8; n = 20) to develop 12 case vignettes. Each vignette includes (1) video representing a critical incident containing concern(s) and/or cue(s), (2) standardized lead-in-question, (3) five response alternatives. In phase 2 we piloted the SJT to assess validity via an experimental study with medical students (n = 88).

RESULTS

Experts and students rated most of the 'Reduce space' responses as inappropriate and preferred 'Explicit' responses. Women scored higher than men and there was no decline of empathy according to students' year of study. There were medium correlations with self-assessment instruments. The students' acceptance of the SJT was high.

CONCLUSION

The use of VR-CoDES, authentic vignettes, videos and expert panels contributed to the development and validity of the SJT.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Development costs were high but could be made up over time. The agreement on a proper score and the implementation of an adequate feedback structure seem to be useful.

摘要

目的

情绪处理技巧是医疗专业人员进行人际沟通的关键组成部分。维罗纳情绪序列编码定义(VR-CoDES)似乎可用于开发用于评估情绪处理技巧的情境判断测验(SJT)。

方法

在第 1 阶段,我们使用专家小组(n=16;n=8;n=20)的多阶段流程来开发 12 个案例情景。每个情景包括(1)代表包含关注和/或线索的关键事件的视频,(2)标准化的引导问题,(3)五个反应选择。在第 2 阶段,我们通过一项针对医学生的实验研究(n=88)来试用 SJT 来评估有效性。

结果

专家和学生对大多数“缩小差距”的回答评价为不恰当,并更喜欢“明确”的回答。女性的得分高于男性,而且根据学生的学习年限,同理心并没有下降。与自我评估工具存在中等相关性。学生对 SJT 的接受度很高。

结论

使用 VR-CoDES、真实情景、视频和专家小组有助于 SJT 的开发和有效性。

实践意义

开发成本很高,但随着时间的推移可以得到弥补。就适当的分数达成一致意见并实施适当的反馈结构似乎很有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验