Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestraße 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Dec;24(12):4519-4530. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03317-1. Epub 2020 May 18.
To analyse the residual monomer (MMA) elution of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) in distilled water after diverse fabrication methods and aging procedures.
PMMA specimens (N = 192, PalaXpress; Kulzer, Hanau, Germany) were manufactured (pouring, n = 96/injection, n = 96) and polymerized in water (55°C) without pressure (n = 48) and with 2 bar pressure (n = 48). Specimens were grinded (n = 24) or polished (n = 24) and aged for 12 h in distilled water/37°C (n = 12) or at air/20°C (n = 12) and stored afterwards in distilled water at 37°C. MMA elution was evaluated after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 15 days (UV/Vis spectrophotometry). Data were analysed with Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Mann-Whitney-U and Cohen-d test using SPSS (α < 0.5).
The pouring procedure resulted in significantly higher MMA elution than the injection procedure up to 5 days. Polymerization with a pressure of 2 bar reduced the MMA elution significantly for poured specimens. Polishing reduced the MMA elution in comparison to grinding.
The fabrication procedure (pouring/injection) showed the strongest correlation to the MMA elution (r = 0.500), followed by polishing (r = 0.243), the pressure during polymerization (r = 0.109) and the storage medium (r = 0.053).
Higher MMA elution may increase the risk of chemical irritations, allergic reactions and hypersensitivities of the oral mucosa. Technicians and dentists should be aware about the elution differences dependent on the fabrication procedure.
分析不同制作方法和老化程序后聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)在蒸馏水中的残留单体(MMA)洗脱情况。
将 PMMA 标本(N=192,PalaXpress;Kulzer,德国哈瑙)(浇铸,n=96/注射,n=96)制成并在水中聚合(无压力,n=48/2 巴压力,n=48),水温 55°C。将标本研磨(n=24)或抛光(n=24),在 37°C 蒸馏水中老化 12 小时(n=12)或在 20°C 空气中老化 12 小时(n=12),随后在 37°C 蒸馏水中储存。使用紫外线/可见分光光度法在 1、2、3、4、5、6、7、10、15 天后评估 MMA 洗脱情况。使用 SPSS(α<0.5)对数据进行 Kolmogorov-Smirnov、Mann-Whitney-U 和 Cohen-d 检验分析。
浇铸工艺导致 MMA 洗脱量在 5 天内明显高于注射工艺。2 巴压力聚合显著降低了浇铸标本的 MMA 洗脱量。抛光比研磨降低 MMA 洗脱量。
制作工艺(浇铸/注射)与 MMA 洗脱量相关性最强(r=0.500),其次是抛光(r=0.243)、聚合时的压力(r=0.109)和储存介质(r=0.053)。
较高的 MMA 洗脱可能会增加化学刺激、过敏反应和口腔黏膜过敏的风险。技术人员和牙医应注意到因制作工艺不同而产生的洗脱差异。