Suppr超能文献

咽鼓管球囊扩张术的局部麻醉与全身麻醉:一项针对中国人群的单中心回顾性研究

Local Versus General Anesthesia for Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube: A Single-Center Retrospective Study in a Chinese Population.

作者信息

Chen Xiaoxin, Xie Lingwen, Zeng Haicang, Xu Yaodong, Xiong Hao

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Institute of Hearing and Speech-Language Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Ear Nose Throat J. 2020 May 19:145561320923172. doi: 10.1177/0145561320923172.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare local anesthesia (LA) versus general anesthesia (GA) for balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube (BDET) using the Bielefeld Dilation System in a Chinese population with obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (OETD).

METHODS

A total of 49 patients with OETD undergoing BDET under either LA or GA were included in the present study. Intraoperative blood pressure, heart rate, and pain sensation were recorded. The surgical outcome was assessed by Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) symptom scores and positive Valsalva maneuver at baseline, 1 day, 2-, 4-, 12-, 24-, and 52-week follow-up.

RESULTS

Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube procedures were successfully completed in all patients without adverse effects. The visual analog scale score for maximal pain during the surgical procedure in the LA group was 6.1 ± 1.0. Intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate were higher in the LA group compared with the GA group. The duration and costs of surgery were significantly reduced in the LA group compared with the GA group. Normalization of ETDQ-7 scores at 12-week and 52-week follow-up was observed in 71.9% (23/32) and 63.3% (19/30) of patients in the LA group, respectively, which was comparable to that of the GA group. Although improvement in positive Valsalva maneuver was observed in both groups after BDET, more patients reported positive Valsalva maneuver in the GA group compared with the LA group at 12-week and 52-week follow-up. In total, 96.0% (24/25) of patients in the LA group and 95.8% (23/24) of patients in the GA group would choose LA if BDET was needed again.

CONCLUSION

Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube under LA is safe and feasible in a Chinese population. The surgical outcome of BDET is comparable between under LA and GA during 52-week follow-up. Further studies are needed to address management of intraoperative pain and determine longer follow-up outcome for BDET under LA.

摘要

目的

在中国患有咽鼓管阻塞性功能障碍(OETD)的人群中,比较使用比勒费尔德扩张系统进行咽鼓管球囊扩张术(BDET)时局部麻醉(LA)与全身麻醉(GA)的效果。

方法

本研究纳入了49例接受LA或GA下BDET的OETD患者。记录术中血压、心率和疼痛感觉。通过咽鼓管功能障碍问卷-7(ETDQ-7)症状评分以及在基线、术后1天、2周、4周、12周、24周和52周随访时的瓦尔萨尔瓦动作阳性情况评估手术效果。

结果

所有患者均成功完成咽鼓管球囊扩张术,无不良反应。LA组手术过程中最大疼痛的视觉模拟量表评分为6.1±1.0。LA组术中血压和心率高于GA组。与GA组相比,LA组手术时间和费用显著降低。LA组分别有71.9%(23/32)和63.3%(19/30)的患者在12周和52周随访时ETDQ-7评分恢复正常,与GA组相当。虽然两组在BDET后瓦尔萨尔瓦动作阳性情况均有改善,但在12周和52周随访时,GA组报告瓦尔萨尔瓦动作阳性的患者比LA组更多。总体而言,如果再次需要BDET,LA组96.0%(24/25)的患者和GA组95.8%(23/24)的患者会选择LA。

结论

在中国人群中,LA下进行咽鼓管球囊扩张术是安全可行的。在52周随访期间,LA和GA下BDET的手术效果相当。需要进一步研究解决术中疼痛管理问题,并确定LA下BDET的更长随访结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验