• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predictors of colony extinction vary by habitat type in social spiders.在群居蜘蛛中,群体灭绝的预测因素因栖息地类型而异。
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2020 Jan;74(1). doi: 10.1007/s00265-019-2781-x. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
2
Warring arthropod societies: Social spider colonies can delay annihilation by predatory ants via reduced apparency and increased group size.敌对的节肢动物社会:社会性蜘蛛群落可通过降低可见度和增加群体规模来延缓被掠食性蚂蚁消灭的时间。
Behav Processes. 2015 Oct;119:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
3
Social spiders of the genus Anelosimus occur in wetter, more productive environments than non-social species.与非群居性蜘蛛物种相比,群居性的阿内洛西姆斯属蜘蛛生活在更湿润、生产力更高的环境中。
Naturwissenschaften. 2013 Nov;100(11):1031-40. doi: 10.1007/s00114-013-1106-6. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
4
Collective behavior and colony persistence of social spiders depends on their physical environment.群居蜘蛛的集体行为和群体存续取决于它们的物理环境。
Behav Ecol. 2019 Jan-Feb;30(1):39-47. doi: 10.1093/beheco/ary158. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
5
Collective aggressiveness limits colony persistence in high- but not low-elevation sites at Amazonian social spiders.在亚马逊社会蜘蛛中,集体攻击性限制了高海拔而非低海拔地区的群体持续时间。
J Evol Biol. 2019 Dec;32(12):1362-1367. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13532. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
6
Good reasons to leave home: proximate dispersal cues in a social spider.离开家园的充分理由:群居蜘蛛的直接扩散线索
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Jul;85(4):1035-42. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12534. Epub 2016 May 16.
7
Predatory spider mimics acquire colony-specific cuticular hydrocarbons from their ant model prey.掠食性蜘蛛模仿者从其蚂蚁模型猎物身上获取特定群体的表皮碳氢化合物。
Naturwissenschaften. 2004 Mar;91(3):143-7. doi: 10.1007/s00114-004-0507-y. Epub 2004 Feb 27.
8
Population history in social spiders repeated: colony structure and lineage evolution in Stegodyphus mimosarum (Eresidae).群居性蜘蛛的种群历史重演:拟态棘腹蛛(刺足蛛科)的群体结构与谱系进化
Mol Ecol. 2009 Jul;18(13):2812-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04238.x. Epub 2009 May 29.
9
Population genetic evidence for sex-specific dispersal in an inbred social spider.近交社会性蜘蛛中性别特异性扩散的群体遗传学证据。
Ecol Evol. 2016 Jul 12;6(15):5479-90. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2200. eCollection 2016 Aug.
10
Prey size and scramble vs. contest competition in a social spider: implications for population dynamics.社会性蜘蛛的猎物大小与争夺式竞争和竞赛式竞争:对种群动态的影响
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Sep;85(5):1401-10. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12559. Epub 2016 Aug 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Social spider webs harbour largely consistent bacterial communities across broad spatial scales.社会蜘蛛网上的细菌群落具有很大的空间尺度一致性。
Biol Lett. 2019 Sep 27;15(9):20190436. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0436. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
2
Collective aggressiveness limits colony persistence in high- but not low-elevation sites at Amazonian social spiders.在亚马逊社会蜘蛛中,集体攻击性限制了高海拔而非低海拔地区的群体持续时间。
J Evol Biol. 2019 Dec;32(12):1362-1367. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13532. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
3
Collective behavior and colony persistence of social spiders depends on their physical environment.群居蜘蛛的集体行为和群体存续取决于它们的物理环境。
Behav Ecol. 2019 Jan-Feb;30(1):39-47. doi: 10.1093/beheco/ary158. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
4
Cooperative foraging expands dietary niche but does not offset intra-group competition for resources in social spiders.合作觅食扩大了食物范围,但不能抵消社会蜘蛛群体内对资源的竞争。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 7;8(1):11828. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30199-x.
5
Exposure to predators reduces collective foraging aggressiveness and eliminates its relationship with colony personality composition.暴露于捕食者会降低群体觅食的攻击性,并消除其与群体个性组成的关系。
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2017 Aug;71(8). doi: 10.1007/s00265-017-2356-7. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
6
Repeatable group differences in the collective behaviour of stickleback shoals across ecological contexts.在不同生态环境下,棘鱼鱼群的集体行为存在可重复的群体差异。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Feb 14;285(1872). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2629.
7
Selection for Collective Aggressiveness Favors Social Susceptibility in Social Spiders.选择有利于社会蜘蛛的集体攻击性,有利于社会易感性。
Curr Biol. 2018 Jan 8;28(1):100-105.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.038. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
What Are the Environmental Determinants of Phenotypic Selection? A Meta-analysis of Experimental Studies.表型选择的环境决定因素有哪些?实验研究的荟萃分析。
Am Nat. 2017 Sep;190(3):363-376. doi: 10.1086/692760. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
9
The primary case is not enough: Variation among individuals, groups and social networks modify bacterial transmission dynamics.主要病例数是不够的:个体、群体和社交网络的差异改变了细菌传播的动态。
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Mar;87(2):369-378. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12729. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
10
Evolution of sociality in spiders leads to depleted genomic diversity at both population and species levels.蜘蛛社会性的进化导致种群和物种水平上的基因组多样性枯竭。
Mol Ecol. 2017 Aug;26(16):4197-4210. doi: 10.1111/mec.14196. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

在群居蜘蛛中,群体灭绝的预测因素因栖息地类型而异。

Predictors of colony extinction vary by habitat type in social spiders.

作者信息

McEwen Brendan L, Lichtenstein James L L, Fisher David N, Wright Colin M, Chism Greg T, Pinter-Wollman Noa, Pruitt Jonathan N

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada.

Department of Ecology, Evolution & Marine Biology, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.

出版信息

Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2020 Jan;74(1). doi: 10.1007/s00265-019-2781-x. Epub 2019 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00265-019-2781-x
PMID:32431472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7236762/
Abstract

Many animal societies are susceptible to mass mortality events and collapse. Elucidating how environmental pressures determine patterns of collapse is important for understanding how such societies function and evolve. Using the social spider , we investigated the environmental drivers of colony extinction along two precipitation gradients across southern Africa, using the Namib and Kalahari deserts versus wetter savanna habitats to the north and east. We deployed experimental colonies ( = 242) along two ~ 800-km transects and returned to assess colony success in the field after 2 months. Specifically, we noted colony extinction events after the 2-month duration and collected environmental data on the correlates of those extinction events (e.g., evidence of ant attacks, no. of prey captured). We found that colony extinction events at desert sites were more frequently associated with attacks by predatory ants as compared with savanna sites, while colony extinctions in wetter savannas sites were more tightly associated with fungal outbreaks. Our findings support the hypothesis that environments vary in the selection pressures that they impose on social organisms, which may explain why different social phenotypes are often favored in each habitat.

摘要

许多动物群体容易遭受大规模死亡事件并走向崩溃。阐明环境压力如何决定崩溃模式对于理解此类群体的功能和进化至关重要。我们以群居蜘蛛为研究对象,利用纳米比亚沙漠和卡拉哈里沙漠与北部和东部较湿润的稀树草原栖息地,沿着南部非洲的两个降水梯度调查了群体灭绝的环境驱动因素。我们沿着两条约800公里的样带部署了实验群体(共242个),并在两个月后返回实地评估群体的存活情况。具体而言,我们记录了两个月后的群体灭绝事件,并收集了与这些灭绝事件相关的环境数据(例如,蚂蚁攻击的证据、捕获的猎物数量)。我们发现,与稀树草原地点相比,沙漠地点的群体灭绝事件更频繁地与捕食性蚂蚁的攻击有关,而较湿润的稀树草原地点的群体灭绝则与真菌爆发联系更为紧密。我们的研究结果支持了这样一种假设,即不同环境对社会性生物施加的选择压力各不相同,这或许可以解释为什么每个栖息地往往都青睐不同的社会表型。