From the Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (G.Y., I.S., Z.Z., Q.H.H., B.P.) the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou City, Henan, China (Z.Z.).
Anesthesiology. 2020 Aug;133(2):408-425. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003348.
Dorsal root ganglion field stimulation is an analgesic neuromodulation approach in use clinically, but its mechanism is unknown as there is no validated animal model for this purpose. The authors hypothesized that ganglion stimulation is effective in reducing pain-like behaviors in preclinical chronic pain models.
The authors provided ganglion stimulation or spinal cord stimulation to rats with traumatic neuropathy (tibial nerve injury), or osteoarthritis induced by intraarticular knee monosodium iodoacetate, or without injury (naïve). Analgesia was evaluated by testing a battery of pain-related reflexive, functional, and affective behaviors.
In rats with nerve injury, multilevel L4 and L5 ganglion stimulation decreased hypersensitivity to noxious mechanical stimulation more (area under curve, -1,447 ± 423 min × % response; n = 12) than single level ganglion stimulation at L4 ([-960 ± 251 min × % response; n = 8; P = 0.012] vs. L4 and L5), and L5 ([-676 ± 295 min × % response; n = 8; P < 0.0001] vs. L4 and L5). Spontaneous pain-like behavior, evaluated by conditioned place preference, responded to single L4 (Pretest [-93 ± 65 s] vs. Test [87 ± 82 s]; P = 0.002; n = 9), L5 (Pretest [-57 ± 36 s] vs. Test [137 ± 73 s]; P = 0.001; n = 8), and multilevel L4 and L5 (Pretest: -81 ± 68 s vs. Test: 90 ± 76 s; P = 0.003; n = 8) ganglion stimulation. In rats with osteoarthritis, multilevel L3 and L4 ganglion stimulation reduced sensitivity to knee motion more (-156 ± 28 min × points; n = 8) than L3 ([-94 ± 19 min × points in knee bend test; n = 7; P = 0.002] vs. L3 and L4) or L4 ([-71 ± 22 min × points; n = 7; P < 0.0001] vs. L3 and L4). Conditioned place preference during osteoarthritis revealed analgesic effectiveness for ganglion stimulation when delivered at L3 (Pretest [-78 ± 77 s] vs. Test [68 ± 136 s]; P = 0.048; n = 9), L4 (Pretest [-96 ± 51 s] vs. Test [73 ± 111 s]; P = 0.004; n = 9), and L3 and L4 (Pretest [-69 ± 52 s; n = 7] vs. Test [55 ± 140 s]; P = 0.022; n = 7).
Dorsal root ganglion stimulation is effective in neuropathic and osteoarthritic preclinical rat pain models with peripheral pathologic origins, demonstrating effectiveness of ganglion stimulation in a placebo-free setting and justifying this model as a suitable platform for mechanistic studies.
背根神经节刺激是一种临床上使用的镇痛神经调节方法,但由于没有针对该目的的经过验证的动物模型,其机制尚不清楚。作者假设神经节刺激在减轻临床前慢性疼痛模型中的疼痛样行为方面是有效的。
作者对创伤性神经病变(胫骨神经损伤)、或膝关节内注射单钠碘乙酸引起的骨关节炎大鼠、或无损伤(未受伤)大鼠提供神经节刺激或脊髓刺激。通过测试一系列与疼痛相关的反射、功能和情感行为来评估镇痛效果。
在神经损伤大鼠中,L4 和 L5 多水平神经节刺激对有害机械刺激的超敏反应的缓解作用比 L4 单水平神经节刺激(-1447 ± 423 分钟×%反应;n = 12)更有效(-960 ± 251 分钟×%反应;n = 8;P = 0.012 比 L4 和 L5;-676 ± 295 分钟×%反应;n = 8;P < 0.0001 比 L4 和 L5)。通过条件性位置偏好评估的自发性疼痛样行为,对 L4 (Pretest [-93 ± 65 s] vs. Test [87 ± 82 s]; P = 0.002; n = 9)、L5 (Pretest [-57 ± 36 s] vs. Test [137 ± 73 s]; P = 0.001; n = 8)和多水平 L4 和 L5 (Pretest: -81 ± 68 s vs. Test: 90 ± 76 s; P = 0.003; n = 8)神经节刺激有反应。在骨关节炎大鼠中,L3 和 L4 多水平神经节刺激对膝关节运动的敏感性降低(-156 ± 28 分钟×点;n = 8)比 L3(膝弯曲试验中的-94 ± 19 分钟×点;n = 7;P = 0.002 比 L3 和 L4)或 L4(-71 ± 22 分钟×点;n = 7;P < 0.0001 比 L3 和 L4)更有效。骨关节炎期间的条件性位置偏好表明,当在 L3(Pretest [-78 ± 77 s] vs. Test [68 ± 136 s]; P = 0.048; n = 9)、L4(Pretest [-96 ± 51 s] vs. Test [73 ± 111 s]; P = 0.004; n = 9)和 L3 和 L4(Pretest [-69 ± 52 s; n = 7] vs. Test [55 ± 140 s]; P = 0.022; n = 7)时进行神经节刺激时,该模型具有镇痛效果。
背根神经节刺激在具有外周病理起源的神经病变和骨关节炎临床前大鼠疼痛模型中是有效的,证明了神经节刺激在无安慰剂环境中的有效性,并证明了该模型是进行机制研究的合适平台。