非糖尿病患者和糖尿病患者扳机指松解术后的功能结果。

Functional outcomes of trigger finger release in non-diabetic and diabetic patients.

机构信息

Queen Margaret Hospital, Dunfermline, UK.

Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020 Dec;45(10):1078-1082. doi: 10.1177/1753193420925027. Epub 2020 May 22.

Abstract

We compared the functional outcomes, health-related quality of life, and satisfaction in diabetic and non-diabetic patients undergoing A1 pulley release for trigger finger in 192 patients. Preoperative and postoperative Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (Quick DASH), EuroQol-5 dimensions, and satisfaction scores were collected prospectively over a 6-year period. These patients had a mean follow-up of 14 months (range 11-40) after surgery. There were 143 patients (143 trigger fingers) without diabetes and 49 patients (49 trigger fingers) with diabetes. We found overall QuickDASH improvement was the same in both groups (-4.5 points). Patient satisfaction rates were comparable in both groups (90% versus 96%), and no significant difference in postoperative health-related quality of life was observed. No complications were reported in either group. We conclude from this study that A1 pulley release leads to similar functional improvement and high patient satisfaction at one year postoperatively in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.: III.

摘要

我们比较了 192 例接受 A1 滑车切开术治疗扳机指的糖尿病和非糖尿病患者的功能结果、健康相关生活质量和满意度。在 6 年的时间里,前瞻性地收集了术前和术后的快速上肢残疾问卷(Quick DASH)、欧洲五维健康量表(EuroQol-5 dimensions)和满意度评分。这些患者术后平均随访 14 个月(范围 11-40)。无糖尿病的患者有 143 例(143 个扳机指),有糖尿病的患者有 49 例(49 个扳机指)。我们发现两组的总体 QuickDASH 改善情况相同(-4.5 分)。两组患者的满意度相当(90%比 96%),术后健康相关生活质量无显著差异。两组均无并发症报告。我们得出结论,在糖尿病和非糖尿病患者中,A1 滑车切开术在术后 1 年可导致相似的功能改善和高患者满意度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索