Suppr超能文献

经阴道单孔无气腹腹腔镜手术中使用 J 形牵开器在附件手术中的应用。

Gasless single-port access laparoscopy using a J-shaped retractor in patients undergoing adnexal surgery.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Simgokro 100 gil 25 Seo-gu, Incheon, 22711, South Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2457-2464. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07654-w. Epub 2020 May 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare gasless single-port access (SPA) laparoscopy using a J-shaped retractor and conventional SPA laparoscopy in patients undergoing adnexal surgery. Study design The medical records of 80 patients who underwent laparoscopic adnexal surgery between May 2017 and April 2019 were reviewed. Of the 80 patients, 40 patients underwent gasless SPA laparoscopy using a J-shaped retractor and 40 underwent conventional SPA laparoscopy. All surgeries were performed by one laparoscopic surgeon. Surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There are no significant differences in age, body mass index, parity, previous abdominal surgery, tumor marker, and tumor diameter between the gasless and conventional groups. The median retraction setup time from skin incision was 7 min (range 5-12 min) in gasless SPA laparoscopic adnexal surgery. The median total operation times were 55.5 min (range 30-155 min) in the gasless group and 55 min (range 30-165 min) in the conventional group without a significant difference. Additionally, there were no differences in operation type, conversion rate of laparotomy, use of an additional trocar, and pathological outcomes between the two groups. No major complications, such as urologic, bowel, and vessel injuries, were found in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Gasless SPA laparoscopy using a J-shaped retractor appears to offer a better alternative to conventional SPA laparoscopy that avoids the potential negative effects of carbon dioxide gas in selected cases.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较经 J 形牵开器的无气单孔通道(SPA)腹腔镜手术与传统 SPA 腹腔镜手术在附件手术中的应用。

研究设计

回顾了 2017 年 5 月至 2019 年 4 月期间接受腹腔镜附件手术的 80 例患者的病历。80 例患者中,40 例行经 J 形牵开器的无气 SPA 腹腔镜手术,40 例行传统 SPA 腹腔镜手术。所有手术均由一位腹腔镜外科医生完成。比较两组患者的手术结果。

结果

无气 SPA 腹腔镜组和传统 SPA 腹腔镜组在年龄、体重指数、产次、既往腹部手术史、肿瘤标志物和肿瘤直径方面无显著差异。无气 SPA 腹腔镜附件手术中,从皮肤切口开始的牵引器设置时间中位数为 7 分钟(5-12 分钟)。无气组的总手术时间中位数为 55.5 分钟(30-155 分钟),传统组为 55 分钟(30-165 分钟),差异无统计学意义。此外,两组的手术类型、剖腹术转化率、附加 trocar 使用情况和病理结果无差异。两组均未发生严重并发症,如泌尿系统、肠道和血管损伤。

结论

在某些情况下,经 J 形牵开器的无气 SPA 腹腔镜似乎是传统 SPA 腹腔镜的更好选择,可以避免二氧化碳气体的潜在负面影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验