• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经阴道单孔无气腹腹腔镜手术中使用 J 形牵开器在附件手术中的应用。

Gasless single-port access laparoscopy using a J-shaped retractor in patients undergoing adnexal surgery.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Simgokro 100 gil 25 Seo-gu, Incheon, 22711, South Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2457-2464. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07654-w. Epub 2020 May 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-020-07654-w
PMID:32444972
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare gasless single-port access (SPA) laparoscopy using a J-shaped retractor and conventional SPA laparoscopy in patients undergoing adnexal surgery. Study design The medical records of 80 patients who underwent laparoscopic adnexal surgery between May 2017 and April 2019 were reviewed. Of the 80 patients, 40 patients underwent gasless SPA laparoscopy using a J-shaped retractor and 40 underwent conventional SPA laparoscopy. All surgeries were performed by one laparoscopic surgeon. Surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There are no significant differences in age, body mass index, parity, previous abdominal surgery, tumor marker, and tumor diameter between the gasless and conventional groups. The median retraction setup time from skin incision was 7 min (range 5-12 min) in gasless SPA laparoscopic adnexal surgery. The median total operation times were 55.5 min (range 30-155 min) in the gasless group and 55 min (range 30-165 min) in the conventional group without a significant difference. Additionally, there were no differences in operation type, conversion rate of laparotomy, use of an additional trocar, and pathological outcomes between the two groups. No major complications, such as urologic, bowel, and vessel injuries, were found in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Gasless SPA laparoscopy using a J-shaped retractor appears to offer a better alternative to conventional SPA laparoscopy that avoids the potential negative effects of carbon dioxide gas in selected cases.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较经 J 形牵开器的无气单孔通道(SPA)腹腔镜手术与传统 SPA 腹腔镜手术在附件手术中的应用。

研究设计

回顾了 2017 年 5 月至 2019 年 4 月期间接受腹腔镜附件手术的 80 例患者的病历。80 例患者中,40 例行经 J 形牵开器的无气 SPA 腹腔镜手术,40 例行传统 SPA 腹腔镜手术。所有手术均由一位腹腔镜外科医生完成。比较两组患者的手术结果。

结果

无气 SPA 腹腔镜组和传统 SPA 腹腔镜组在年龄、体重指数、产次、既往腹部手术史、肿瘤标志物和肿瘤直径方面无显著差异。无气 SPA 腹腔镜附件手术中,从皮肤切口开始的牵引器设置时间中位数为 7 分钟(5-12 分钟)。无气组的总手术时间中位数为 55.5 分钟(30-155 分钟),传统组为 55 分钟(30-165 分钟),差异无统计学意义。此外,两组的手术类型、剖腹术转化率、附加 trocar 使用情况和病理结果无差异。两组均未发生严重并发症,如泌尿系统、肠道和血管损伤。

结论

在某些情况下,经 J 形牵开器的无气 SPA 腹腔镜似乎是传统 SPA 腹腔镜的更好选择,可以避免二氧化碳气体的潜在负面影响。

相似文献

1
Gasless single-port access laparoscopy using a J-shaped retractor in patients undergoing adnexal surgery.经阴道单孔无气腹腹腔镜手术中使用 J 形牵开器在附件手术中的应用。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2457-2464. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07654-w. Epub 2020 May 22.
2
Gasless Laparoscopic Myomectomy Using A J-shaped Retractor and Suture Technique.无气腹腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术应用 J 形牵开器和缝合技术。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Aug;30(4):356-360. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000794.
3
Comparative study on gasless laparoscopy using a new device versus conventional laparoscopy for surgical management of postmenopausal patients.使用新型设备的免气腹腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜用于绝经后患者手术治疗的对比研究
J Minim Access Surg. 2022 Jul-Sep;18(3):346-352. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_82_21.
4
Comparison of General Anesthesia and Combined Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia for Gasless Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology.全麻与腰硬联合麻醉用于妇科无气腹腹腔镜手术的比较。
JSLS. 2022 Apr-Jun;26(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00004.
5
Gasless Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with New Abdominal-Wall Retraction System.采用新型腹壁牵开系统的免气腹全腹腔镜子宫切除术
JSLS. 2020 Jan-Mar;24(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00061.
6
Is single-port access laparoscopy less painful than conventional laparoscopy for adnexal surgery? A comparison of postoperative pain and surgical outcomes.单孔腹腔镜附件手术是否比传统腹腔镜手术疼痛更轻?术后疼痛与手术结果的比较。
Surg Innov. 2013 Feb;20(1):46-54. doi: 10.1177/1553350612439632. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
7
Two-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery with a multichannel port using a wound retractor: is it safe and minimally scarring?使用伤口牵开器的多通道端口双孔腹腔镜附件手术:它安全且瘢痕最小吗?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Dec;19(6):781-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2009.0052.
8
Management of large cystic adnexal tumor by gasless laparoscopic-assisted surgery with wound retractor.使用伤口牵开器的无气腹腔镜辅助手术治疗大的附件囊性肿瘤
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):644-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.04.003.
9
Single-port-access, hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for benign large adnexal tumors versus single-port pure laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors.经单孔入路手助腹腔镜手术与经单孔入路纯腹腔镜手术治疗附件良性大肿瘤的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26(3):693-703. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1939-z. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
10
Gasless single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for large uteri weighing 500g or more.无气腹单孔腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫切除术治疗重量500g及以上的大子宫。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Aug;203:239-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Early experience with the gasless vNOTES technique for adnexal surgery.无气单孔腹腔镜附件手术的早期经验。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jun;169(3):1232-1238. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.16136. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
2
Global scientific production on gasless laparoscopy: a bibliometric analysis.全球无气腹腔镜检查的科学产出:一项文献计量分析。
Front Surg. 2024 Aug 9;11:1416681. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1416681. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparative study on gasless laparoscopy using a new device versus conventional laparoscopy for surgical management of postmenopausal patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of gasless laparoscopy on circulation, respiration, stress response, and other complications in gynecological geriatrics.免气腹腹腔镜对老年妇科患者循环、呼吸、应激反应及其他并发症的影响
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 Sep 15;7(9):2877-82. eCollection 2014.
使用新型设备的免气腹腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜用于绝经后患者手术治疗的对比研究
J Minim Access Surg. 2022 Jul-Sep;18(3):346-352. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_82_21.