Ramanujan Vishnu, Krishnamurthy Arvind, Venkataramani Karthik, Kumar Chandra
Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA),38, Sardar Patel Rd, Adyar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA),38, Sardar Patel Rd, Adyar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Indian J Cancer. 2020 Apr-Jun;57(2):172-181. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_497_18.
Despite the advances in systemic treatment, about 30%-40% of the patients with extremity osteosarcomas relapse and more than 80% of these relapses localize in the lungs. Our understanding of the management of pulmonary metastases from extremity osteosarcomas is largely based on retrospective data from single institutions or compiled from registries; hence, there is great degree of variability in the reported management of pulmonary metastasis in patients with osteosarcomas.
To analyze the demographic profile, disease characteristics and survival outcomes of patients who had undergone potentially curative pulmonary metastasectomies from extremity osteosarcomas.
Retrospective analysis of the 37 patients with resectable pulmonary metastasis (both synchronous and metachronous) from osteosarcoma of the extremity, treated from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2017 at a tertiary regional cancer center in South India.
The median overall survival (OS) of our patient cohort was 38 ± 2.7 months. The 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 86 ± 5.8%, 60.8 ± 8.6%, and 20.7 ± 7.4%, respectively. A formal analysis of the various prognostic factors revealed disease-free interval >2 years, completion of the planned systemic chemotherapy, and absence of pulmonary recurrence post-metastasectomy to be significantly influencing the survival outcomes.
Our study reiterates the need for consideration of pulmonary metastasectomy in carefully selected patients of extremity osteosarcomas. There is a paucity of data on pulmonary metastasectomies from India and our cohort is possibly the largest series for pulmonary metastasectomies from an osteosarcoma primary. In routine clinical practice, we recommend that the final decision to proceed with pulmonary metastasectomy should ideally be taken by a multidisciplinary tumor board on a case-by-case basis.
尽管全身治疗取得了进展,但约30%-40%的肢体骨肉瘤患者会复发,其中超过80%的复发发生在肺部。我们对肢体骨肉瘤肺转移治疗的理解很大程度上基于单个机构的回顾性数据或登记处汇总的数据;因此,骨肉瘤患者肺转移的报告治疗方法存在很大差异。
分析接受过肢体骨肉瘤潜在根治性肺转移切除术患者的人口统计学特征、疾病特征和生存结果。
对2003年1月1日至2017年12月31日在印度南部一家三级区域癌症中心接受治疗的37例可切除肢体骨肉瘤肺转移(同时性和异时性)患者进行回顾性分析。
我们患者队列的中位总生存期(OS)为38±2.7个月。2年、3年和5年总生存率分别为86±5.8%、60.8±8.6%和20.7±7.4%。对各种预后因素的正式分析显示,无病间隔>2年、完成计划的全身化疗以及肺转移切除术后无肺复发对生存结果有显著影响。
我们的研究重申了在精心挑选的肢体骨肉瘤患者中考虑肺转移切除术的必要性。印度关于肺转移切除术的数据很少,我们的队列可能是骨肉瘤原发灶肺转移切除术最大的系列研究。在常规临床实践中,我们建议理想情况下应由多学科肿瘤委员会根据具体情况做出进行肺转移切除术的最终决定。