• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良锁孔技术治疗造口旁疝:病例系列

Modified keyhole technique for the treatment of parastomal hernia: A case series.

作者信息

Ando Ryohei, Sato Ryuichiro, Oikawa Masaya, Kakita Tetsuya, Okada Takaho, Tsuchiya Takashi

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sendai City Medical Center Sendai Open Hospital, 5-22-1 Tsurugaya, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, 983-0824, Japan; Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sendai City Medical Center Sendai Open Hospital, 5-22-1 Tsurugaya, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, 983-0824, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;71:107-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.04.082. Epub 2020 May 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.04.082
PMID:32446987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7242996/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Parastomal hernia is one of the common complications of permanent stoma, and its incidence was nearly 50%. Surgical management is challenging and associated with relatively high recurrence rate. Mesh repair was demonstrated to reduce recurrence compared to non-mesh repair, and modified Surgerbaker and keyhole technique are the most cited intraperitoneal mesh repairs. In the keyhole technique, recurrence often occurs by herniation through the central hole. We present four parastomal hernia cases successfully repaired by modified keyhole technique, in which a cylinder-shaped synthetic mesh was attached to the keyhole mesh to cover the angle between the keyhole and the bowel.

PRESENTATION OF CASES

There were 1 male and 3 females with mean BMI of 25.7 kg/m. Mean operative time was 114 min. There were two end-colostomies, one loop-ileostomy and one ileal conduit cases. Postoperative complication was observed in two cases, which was cerebral infarction and paralytic ileus. There were neither infectious complications nor seroma formation, and mean postoperative hospital stay was 18 days. With mean follow-up time of 36 months (range 10-66), we experienced no recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Having lower recurrence rate, the modified Sugerbaker technique is considered preferable over the keyhole technique, but the bowel going to the stoma needs to be lateralized enough to be covered by relatively large mesh, which is not always accomplished. In such instances, our modified keyhole technique would be a feasible alternative.

摘要

引言

造口旁疝是永久性造口常见的并发症之一,其发生率近50%。手术治疗具有挑战性且复发率相对较高。与非补片修补相比,补片修补已被证明可降低复发率,改良的Surgerbaker修补术和钥匙孔技术是最常被引用的腹腔内补片修补术。在钥匙孔技术中,复发常通过中央孔疝出而发生。我们报告了4例采用改良钥匙孔技术成功修补的造口旁疝病例,其中在钥匙孔补片上附加了一个圆柱形合成补片,以覆盖钥匙孔与肠管之间的夹角。

病例介绍

患者1例男性,3例女性,平均体重指数为25.7kg/m。平均手术时间为114分钟。其中有2例末端结肠造口术、1例袢式回肠造口术和1例回肠膀胱术病例。2例患者出现术后并发症,分别为脑梗死和麻痹性肠梗阻。既无感染性并发症也无血清肿形成,术后平均住院时间为18天。平均随访时间为36个月(范围10 - 66个月),未出现复发情况。

结论

改良的Sugerbaker技术复发率较低,被认为优于钥匙孔技术,但通向造口的肠管需要充分侧向移位以被相对较大的补片覆盖,而这并非总能实现。在这种情况下,我们的改良钥匙孔技术将是一种可行的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b08/7242996/b0553440d2dd/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b08/7242996/2561a9362db5/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b08/7242996/39ffcda27444/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b08/7242996/0f0fff51e51f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b08/7242996/ab028e14839d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b08/7242996/b0553440d2dd/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b08/7242996/2561a9362db5/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b08/7242996/39ffcda27444/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b08/7242996/0f0fff51e51f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b08/7242996/ab028e14839d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b08/7242996/b0553440d2dd/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Modified keyhole technique for the treatment of parastomal hernia: A case series.改良锁孔技术治疗造口旁疝:病例系列
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;71:107-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.04.082. Epub 2020 May 12.
2
[Repair in situ of parastomal hernia with modified sublay-keyhole technique].[改良腹膜前间隙-锁孔技术原位修复造口旁疝]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Sep;25(9):1067-70.
3
Laparoscopic slit mesh repair of parastomal hernia using a designated mesh: long-term results.腹腔镜下专用补片修补术治疗造口旁疝:长期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan;26(1):267-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1866-z. Epub 2011 Aug 20.
4
Laparoscopic Keyhole Versus Sugarbaker Repair in Parastomal Hernia: A Long-Term Case-Controlled Prospective Study of Consecutive Patients.腹腔镜锁孔手术与Sugarbaker修补术治疗造口旁疝:连续患者的长期病例对照前瞻性研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Jul;30(7):783-789. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0074. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
5
A case report of modified laparoscopic keyhole plus repair for parastomal hernia following ileal conduit.回肠膀胱术后造口旁疝改良腹腔镜匙孔修补术1例报告
J Minim Access Surg. 2017 Oct-Dec;13(4):312-314. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_249_16.
6
A modified sublay-keyhole technique for in situ parastomal hernia repair.改良经皮下锁孔技术原位修补造口旁疝。
Surg Today. 2012 Sep;42(9):842-7. doi: 10.1007/s00595-011-0095-3. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
7
Robotic Parastomal Hernia Repair With Biologic Mesh.生物补片机器人辅助造口旁疝修补术
Urology. 2017 Dec;110:262. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.08.033. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
8
The modified laparoscopic keyhole parastomal hernia repair with in situ re-ostomy has low recurrence rate.改良腹腔镜钥匙孔造口旁疝修补术原位重新造口的复发率较低。
Hernia. 2018 Aug;22(4):685-690. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1789-x. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
9
Keyhole versus Sugarbaker techniques in parastomal hernia repair following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a retrospective nationwide cohort study.回肠代膀胱术后造口旁疝修补中匙孔技术与Sugarbaker技术的比较:一项全国性回顾性队列研究
BMC Surg. 2021 May 3;21(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01228-w.
10
Clinical outcomes after parastomal hernia repair with a polyester monofilament composite mesh: a cohort study of 79 consecutive patients.使用聚酯单丝复合补片修复造口旁疝后的临床结局:79例连续患者的队列研究
Hernia. 2018 Apr;22(2):371-377. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1721-9. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Management and outcomes profiles of parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: a systematic review.根治性膀胱切除术和回肠代膀胱术后造口旁疝的管理及预后概况:一项系统评价
Hernia. 2025 May 23;29(1):180. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03359-y.
2
Modified Laparoscopic Sugarbaker Repair of Parastomal Hernia With a Totally Extraperitoneal Technique.采用完全腹膜外技术的改良腹腔镜Sugarbaker修补术治疗造口旁疝
Front Surg. 2021 Oct 5;8:740430. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.740430. eCollection 2021.
3
Endoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Repair of Parastomal Hernia: A Case Report.

本文引用的文献

1
The PROCESS 2018 statement: Updating Consensus Preferred Reporting Of CasE Series in Surgery (PROCESS) guidelines.PROCESS 2018 声明:更新外科手术病例系列报告的共识首选报告规范(PROCESS)指南。
Int J Surg. 2018 Dec;60:279-282. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.10.031. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
2
Parastomal hernia repair using the "top hat" technique - An initial experience in 30 patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.采用“礼帽”技术修补造口旁疝 - 纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心 30 例初步经验。
Am J Surg. 2018 Sep;216(3):465-470. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
3
Parastomal Hernia Repair with Intraperitoneal Mesh.
内镜下完全腹膜外修补造口旁疝:病例报告
Front Surg. 2021 May 20;8:659102. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.659102. eCollection 2021.
使用腹腔内补片修补造口旁疝
Surg Res Pract. 2017;2017:8597463. doi: 10.1155/2017/8597463. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
4
Prophylactic mesh placement for the PREvention of paraSTOmal hernias: The PRESTO systematic review and meta-analysis.预防性放置补片预防造口旁疝:PRESTO系统评价与Meta分析
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 9;12(2):e0171548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171548. eCollection 2017.
5
Prophylactic Mesh Placement During Formation of an End-colostomy Reduces the Rate of Parastomal Hernia: Short-term Results of the Dutch PREVENT-trial.在末端结肠造口形成过程中预防性放置补片可降低造口旁疝的发生率:荷兰PREVENT试验的短期结果
Ann Surg. 2017 Apr;265(4):663-669. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001903.
6
Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: A meta-analysis.腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术的现状:一项荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 28;21(28):8670-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i28.8670.
7
Systematic review of open techniques for parastomal hernia repair.造口旁疝修补开放技术的系统评价
Tech Coloproctol. 2014 May;18(5):427-32. doi: 10.1007/s10151-013-1110-z. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
8
Biologic versus nonbiologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.生物补片与非生物补片在腹外疝修补术中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2014 Jan;38(1):40-50. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2232-1.
9
Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature.手术治疗造口旁疝的技术:文献系统综述。
Ann Surg. 2012 Apr;255(4):685-95. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824b44b1.
10
Does expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh really shrink after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair?腹腔镜腹外疝修补术后膨体聚四氟乙烯补片真的会收缩吗?
Hernia. 2012 Jun;16(3):321-5. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0898-6. Epub 2011 Dec 15.