Departamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Departamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Methods and Techniques, Psychology Course, Pontifical Catholic University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Jun;73:102238. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102238. Epub 2020 May 13.
Attentional bias (AB) refers to increased allocation of attention on threat stimuli when compared to neutral stimuli. It is not clear if AB occurs in subjects with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). We tested AB for symmetry and cleaning symptoms of OCD. Sixty-two patients with OCD and 40 healthy controls matched by gender, age and IQ, completed a computerized dot-probe task where two pictures (with symmetry or cleaning related content) were shown. The probe appeared in the location previously occupied by one of the pictures. Within-subjects linear mixed-effect models were used to investigate the effects of the factors: group (patients vs controls), OCD dimension (cleaning vs symmetry), task condition (neutral, congruent and incongruent), and the interaction among them. We also correlated AB scores with the clinical and demographic variables. No positive interaction resulted among the factors, but positive results were observed in group and condition, separately. Patients were significantly slower than controls (p-value = 0.014) (an effect that was accounted for by depression and anxiety symptoms and comorbidity) and the neutral condition was significantly faster when compared the other two conditions (congruent and incongruent, p-value = 0.013). No association was found between AB scores and clinical symptoms. There was no AB toward specific, content-related, stimuli in this sample of OCD patients.
注意偏向(AB)是指与中性刺激相比,对威胁刺激的注意力分配增加。目前尚不清楚强迫症(OCD)患者是否存在 AB。我们测试了 OCD 的对称性和清洁症状的 AB。62 名 OCD 患者和 40 名按性别、年龄和智商匹配的健康对照者完成了一项计算机点探测任务,其中显示了两张图片(具有对称性或清洁相关内容)。探针出现在先前一张图片所在的位置。使用单因素线性混合效应模型来研究以下因素的影响:组(患者与对照)、OCD 维度(清洁与对称)、任务条件(中性、一致和不一致),以及它们之间的相互作用。我们还将 AB 评分与临床和人口统计学变量相关联。虽然各因素之间没有产生积极的相互作用,但分别在组和条件方面观察到了积极的结果。患者的反应速度明显慢于对照组(p 值=0.014)(这种差异可归因于抑郁和焦虑症状以及共病),且与其他两种条件相比,中性条件明显更快(一致和不一致,p 值=0.013)。AB 评分与临床症状之间没有关联。在这个 OCD 患者样本中,没有发现针对特定、内容相关的刺激的 AB。