Suppr超能文献

脊柱外科医生谷歌搜索排名的相关因素:学术背景、社交媒体影响力和患者评分分析。

Correlates of Google Search Rankings for Spine Surgeons: An Analysis of Academic Pedigree, Social Media Presence, and Patient Ratings.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Oct 1;45(19):1376-1381. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003567.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to identify correlates of search ranking among academic pedigree, online ratings, and social media following.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Patients increasingly rely on online search in selecting healthcare providers. When choosing a spine surgeon, patients typically value surgical skill and experience as well as demeanor/bedside manner. It is unclear whether current search engine ranking algorithms reflect these preferences.

METHODS

A Google.com search for the top 25 spine surgeon websites by search ranking was conducted for each of the largest 25 American cities. Resulting websites were then perused for academic pedigree, experience, and practice characteristics. Surgeons' research output and impact were then quantified via number of publications and H-index. Online ratings and followers in various social media outlets were also noted. These variables were assessed as possible correlates of search ranking via linear regression and multivariate analyses of variance.

RESULTS

A total of 625 surgeons were included. Three categorical variables were identified as significant correlates of higher mean Google search ranking-orthopedics (vs. neurosurgery) as a surgical specialty (P = 0.023), board certification (P = 0.024), and graduation from a top 40 residency program (P = 0.046). Although the majority of the identified surgeons received an allopathic medical education, there was no significant difference in the mean rank of surgeons who had an MD versus DO medical degree (P = 0.530). Additionally, none of the continuous variables collected, including years in practice (P = 0.947), publications (P = 0.527), H-index (P = 0.278), social media following such as on Facebook (P = 0.105), or online ratings such as on Healthgrades (P = 0.080), were significant correlates of Google search ranking.

CONCLUSIONS

Google search rankings do not always align with patient preferences, currently promoting orthopedic over neurosurgical specialists, graduation from top residency programs, and board certification, while largely ignoring academic pedigree, research, social media presence, and online ratings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

研究设计

前瞻性观察研究。

目的

本研究的目的是确定学术渊源、在线评分和社交媒体关注与搜索排名的相关性。

背景资料总结

患者在选择医疗服务提供者时越来越依赖在线搜索。当选择脊柱外科医生时,患者通常重视手术技能和经验以及风度/态度。目前的搜索引擎排名算法是否反映了这些偏好尚不清楚。

方法

对美国最大的 25 个城市中的每个城市的前 25 名脊柱外科医生网站进行了谷歌搜索排名。然后浏览这些网站的学术渊源、经验和实践特点。通过出版物数量和 H 指数来量化外科医生的研究成果和影响力。还注意到各种社交媒体渠道的在线评分和关注者。通过线性回归和多元方差分析评估这些变量作为搜索排名的可能相关因素。

结果

共纳入 625 名外科医生。三个分类变量被确定为较高平均谷歌搜索排名的显著相关因素-骨科(与神经外科相比)作为外科专业(P=0.023)、委员会认证(P=0.024)和毕业于前 40 名住院医师培训计划(P=0.046)。尽管大多数确定的外科医生接受了西医医学教育,但 MD 与 DO 医学学位的外科医生的平均排名没有显著差异(P=0.530)。此外,收集的连续变量中没有一个,包括从业年限(P=0.947)、出版物(P=0.527)、H 指数(P=0.278)、社交媒体关注,如 Facebook(P=0.105)或在线评分,如 Healthgrades(P=0.080),与谷歌搜索排名相关。

结论

谷歌搜索排名并不总是符合患者的偏好,目前主要推广骨科专业而不是神经外科专业、毕业于顶尖住院医师培训计划以及委员会认证,而在很大程度上忽略了学术渊源、研究、社交媒体存在和在线评分。

证据水平

3 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验