Santiago Cassiano C, Santiago Diego C, Sebro Ronnie
Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Originalis Biotech Ltd, Itarema, Ceara, Brazil.
Clin Imaging. 2020 Oct;66:67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.04.032. Epub 2020 May 7.
Medicaid reimbursements for physician services are determined by each state. However, how these reimbursements vary between states, and how these reimbursements vary in comparison to Medicare reimbursements is unknown for musculoskeletal radiology studies.
To evaluate the variability in Medicaid and Medicare physician reimbursements for musculoskeletal imaging studies between states.
We evaluated the Medicare and Medicaid physician reimbursements for the most commonly performed musculoskeletal radiology studies (15 radiographs and 10 MRIs) based on Medicare's 2017 National Summary Data File. Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements for these studies were compared by dollar difference (difference in reimbursement in dollars between Medicare and Medicaid). State-wide variability in these reimbursements was quantified by the coefficient of variation (COV) and by the dollar difference in reimbursement amounts. Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement rates were compared using a paired t-test, since the data was paired by state.
The mean Medicaid reimbursement rates were lower for musculoskeletal radiographs (p < 0.05) but higher for musculoskeletal MRI studies than the Medicare rates (p < 0.05). As hypothesized, there was variation in both Medicare and Medicaid imaging reimbursements between states, however, the variation was substantially higher for Medicaid reimbursements. We found the Medicare reimbursement COV between states was 0.07 for all imaging studies, whereas the Medicaid reimbursement COV between states varied from 0.23 to 0.55 for radiographs and from 0.31 to 0.45 for MRIs.
The data show that there is mild, but constant variation across imaging studies in Medicare reimbursement for musculoskeletal imaging studies between states. However, there is more variation in the Medicaid reimbursements across imaging studies and between states. More appropriate reimbursement may increase access to care for Medicaid patients.
各州确定医疗补助计划对医生服务的报销额度。然而,对于肌肉骨骼放射学研究,这些报销额度在各州之间如何变化,以及与医疗保险报销额度相比如何变化尚不清楚。
评估各州之间医疗补助计划和医疗保险对肌肉骨骼成像研究的医生报销额度的差异。
我们根据医疗保险2017年国家汇总数据文件,评估了最常进行的肌肉骨骼放射学研究(15张X光片和10次核磁共振成像)的医疗保险和医疗补助计划医生报销额度。通过美元差值(医疗保险和医疗补助计划报销金额的美元差值)比较这些研究的医疗保险和医疗补助计划报销额度。这些报销额度在全州范围内的差异通过变异系数(COV)和报销金额的美元差值进行量化。由于数据按州配对,使用配对t检验比较医疗补助计划和医疗保险报销率。
肌肉骨骼X光片的医疗补助计划平均报销率低于医疗保险(p < 0.05),但肌肉骨骼核磁共振成像研究的医疗补助计划平均报销率高于医疗保险(p < 0.05)。正如所假设的,医疗保险和医疗补助计划的成像报销额度在各州之间存在差异,然而,医疗补助计划报销额度的差异要大得多。我们发现,所有成像研究的各州之间医疗保险报销变异系数为0.07,而各州之间医疗补助计划报销变异系数对于X光片从0.23到0.55,对于核磁共振成像从0.31到0.45。
数据表明,各州之间医疗保险对肌肉骨骼成像研究的报销额度在成像研究中存在轻微但持续的差异。然而,医疗补助计划报销额度在成像研究和各州之间的差异更大。更合适的报销额度可能会增加医疗补助计划患者获得医疗服务的机会。