• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 大流行期间的妇产科服务提供情况:英国国民保健制度中初级医生的调查。

Provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of junior doctors in the UK National Health Service.

机构信息

UK Audit and Research Collaborative in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, London, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2020 Aug;127(9):1123-1128. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16313. Epub 2020 May 27.

DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.16313
PMID:32460422
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7283977/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is disrupting health services worldwide. We aimed to evaluate the provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services in the UK during the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

DESIGN

Interview-based national survey.

SETTING

Women's healthcare units in the National Health Service.

POPULATION

Junior doctors in obstetrics and gynaecology.

METHODS

Participants were interviewed by members of the UK Audit and Research in Obstetrics and Gynaecology trainees' collaborative between 28 March and 7 April 2020. We used a quantitative analysis for closed-ended questions and a thematic framework analysis for open comments.

RESULTS

We received responses from 148/155 units (95%), most of the participants were in years 3-7 of training (121/148, 82%). Most completed specific training drills for managing obstetric and gynaecological emergencies in women with COVID-19 (89/148, 60.1%) and two-person donning and doffing of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (96/148, 64.9%). The majority of surveyed units implemented COVID-19-specific protocols (130/148, 87.8%), offered adequate PPE (135/148, 91.2%) and operated dedicated COVID-19 emergency theatres (105/148, 70.8%). Most units reduced face-to-face antenatal clinics (117/148, 79.1%) and suspended elective gynaecology services (131/148, 88.5%). The 2-week referral pathway for oncological gynaecology was not affected in half of the units (76/148, 51.4%), but half reported a planned reduction in oncology surgery (82/148, 55.4%).

CONCLUSION

The provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services in the UK during the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic seems to be in line with current guidelines, but strategic planning is needed to restore routine gynaecology services and ensure safe access to maternity care in the long term.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services during the acute phase of COVID-19 is in line with current guidelines, strategic planning is needed to restore routine services and ensure safe access to care in the long term.

摘要

目的

2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行正在扰乱全球卫生服务。本研究旨在评估 COVID-19 大流行急性阶段英国的妇产科服务提供情况。

设计

基于访谈的全国性调查。

地点

英国国民保健署下属的妇女保健单位。

人群

妇产科初级医生。

方法

2020 年 3 月 28 日至 4 月 7 日期间,由英国妇产科审计和研究培训生合作组织的成员对参与者进行了访谈。我们对封闭式问题进行了定量分析,并对开放式评论进行了主题框架分析。

结果

我们收到了 155 个单位中的 148 个(95%)的回复,大多数参与者处于培训的第 3-7 年(121/148,82%)。大多数人完成了针对 COVID-19 女性的妇产科急症管理的专项培训演练(89/148,60.1%)和双人穿戴和脱下个人防护设备(PPE)(96/148,64.9%)。接受调查的大多数单位实施了 COVID-19 专项方案(130/148,87.8%),提供了充足的 PPE(135/148,91.2%),并设有专用的 COVID-19 急症手术室(105/148,70.8%)。大多数单位减少了面对面的产前检查(117/148,79.1%)和暂停了选择性妇科服务(131/148,88.5%)。在一半的单位(76/148,51.4%)中,两周的肿瘤妇科转诊途径未受影响,但一半的单位报告计划减少肿瘤手术(82/148,55.4%)。

结论

在 COVID-19 大流行的急性阶段,英国的妇产科服务提供情况似乎符合当前指南,但需要进行战略规划,以恢复常规妇科服务并确保长期安全获得产妇护理。

推文摘要

COVID-19 急性阶段的妇产科服务提供符合当前指南,需要进行战略规划,以恢复常规服务并确保长期安全获得护理。

相似文献

1
Provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of junior doctors in the UK National Health Service.COVID-19 大流行期间的妇产科服务提供情况:英国国民保健制度中初级医生的调查。
BJOG. 2020 Aug;127(9):1123-1128. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16313. Epub 2020 May 27.
2
The influence of the COVID-19 outbreak on European trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology: A survey of the impact on training and trainee.COVID-19 疫情对欧洲妇产科住院医师培训的影响:对培训和住院医师的影响调查。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Jun;261:52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
3
Management strategy of pregnant women during COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间孕妇的管理策略
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Aug;60(4):E9-E10. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13202.
4
Preparing maternity for COVID-19: A translational simulation approach.为应对新冠疫情做好产科准备:一种转化模拟方法。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Aug;60(4):628-632. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13185. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
5
[Protection suggestions on medical staff in obstetrics and gynecology in COVID-19-designated hospitals].[新冠肺炎定点医院妇产科医务人员防护建议]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;55(4):217-220. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200302-00160.
6
Obstetric and gynaecology trainees' knowledge of paediatric and adolescent gynaecology services in the UK: A national qualitative thematic analysis.英国妇产科实习医生对儿科和青少年妇科服务的了解:一项全国性定性主题分析
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Apr;235:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.01.029. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
7
Being an obstetrics and gynaecology resident during the COVID-19: Impact of the pandemic on the residency training program.在 COVID-19 期间担任妇产科住院医师:疫情对住院医师培训计划的影响。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Oct;253:48-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.07.057. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
8
The effect of the measures taken during the coronavirus pandemic on specialty trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology in the United Kingdom: an online questionnaire survey in one region.新冠疫情期间采取的措施对英国妇产科专科受训者的影响:一个地区的在线问卷调查。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jul;42(5):1455-1460. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.2002286. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
9
COVID-19: Results of a national survey of United Kingdom healthcare professionals' perceptions of current management strategy - A cross-sectional questionnaire study.COVID-19:英国医护专业人员对当前管理策略看法的全国性调查结果——一项横断面问卷调查研究。
Int J Surg. 2020 Jul;79:156-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.042. Epub 2020 May 21.
10
The Shifting Roles of the SOGC in the Face of the COVID-19 Pandemic.面对新冠疫情时加拿大妇产科医师协会角色的转变
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 Jul;42(7):825-826. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.05.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Glycaemic control in labour with diabetes: GILD, a scoping study.糖尿病产妇分娩期间的血糖控制:GILD,一项范围界定研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(41):1-150. doi: 10.3310/KHGD2761.
2
A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge, Attitude and Current Behaviours towards Female Fertility Preservation Services within the UK.英国医疗保健专业人员对女性生育力保存服务的知识、态度和当前行为的横断面调查。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 25;16(15):2649. doi: 10.3390/cancers16152649.
3
COVID-19 related barriers to institutional childbirth during the early phase of the pandemic in rural Arsi zone, Ethiopia, 2022: A qualitative study.2022年埃塞俄比亚阿尔西地区农村疫情早期与机构分娩相关的新冠疫情障碍:一项定性研究
Heliyon. 2024 May 28;10(11):e32051. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32051. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.
4
Predictive Factors of Physicians' Satisfaction and Quality of Work Under Teleconsultation Conditions: Structural Equation Analysis.远程问诊条件下影响医师满意度和工作质量的预测因素:结构方程分析
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jun 10;11:e47810. doi: 10.2196/47810.
5
A consensus statement on perinatal mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic and recommendations for post-pandemic recovery and re-build.关于COVID-19大流行期间围产期心理健康的共识声明以及大流行后恢复和重建的建议。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2024 Feb 21;5:1347388. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1347388. eCollection 2024.
6
Diagnosis and management of endometrial hyperplasia: A UK national audit of adherence to national guidance 2012-2020.子宫内膜增生的诊断和管理:2012-2020 年英国国家审计对遵循国家指南的情况
PLoS Med. 2024 Feb 29;21(2):e1004346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004346. eCollection 2024 Feb.
7
Induction of labour care in the UK: A cross-sectional survey of maternity units.英国的引产护理:对产科病房的横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 28;19(2):e0297857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297857. eCollection 2024.
8
Impact of COVID-19 on access to and delivery of sexual and reproductive healthcare services in countries with universal healthcare systems: A systematic review.新冠疫情对全民医保国家获得和提供性与生殖健康保健服务的影响:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0294744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294744. eCollection 2024.
9
Provision and utilization of maternal health services during the COVID-19 pandemic in 16 hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲16家医院在2019年冠状病毒病疫情期间孕产妇保健服务的提供与利用情况
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Oct 31;4:1192473. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1192473. eCollection 2023.
10
The impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital admissions and treatment management of ectopic pregnancy.新冠疫情第一波对异位妊娠住院及治疗管理的影响
Turk J Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 3;23(4):238-243. doi: 10.4103/tjem.tjem_37_23. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
The Italian health system and the COVID-19 challenge.意大利医疗体系与新冠疫情挑战
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e253. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30074-8. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
2
Telemedicine in the Era of COVID-19.新冠疫情时代的远程医疗
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 May;8(5):1489-1491. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
3
Covid-19: doctors' leaders warn that staff could quit and may die over lack of protective equipment.新冠疫情:医生领袖警告称,工作人员可能因缺乏防护设备而辞职甚至死亡。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 26;368:m1257. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1257.
4
Critical Care Utilization for the COVID-19 Outbreak in Lombardy, Italy: Early Experience and Forecast During an Emergency Response.意大利伦巴第大区新冠疫情期间的重症监护利用情况:应急响应中的早期经验与预测
JAMA. 2020 Apr 28;323(16):1545-1546. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4031.
5
Response to COVID-19 in Taiwan: Big Data Analytics, New Technology, and Proactive Testing.台湾对COVID-19的应对:大数据分析、新技术与主动检测
JAMA. 2020 Apr 14;323(14):1341-1342. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3151.
6
COVID-19-New Insights on a Rapidly Changing Epidemic.《2019冠状病毒病——快速演变疫情的新见解》
JAMA. 2020 Apr 14;323(14):1339-1340. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3072.
7
Protecting health-care workers from subclinical coronavirus infection.保护医护人员免受亚临床冠状病毒感染。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Mar;8(3):e13. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30066-7. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
8
Engagement with perinatal mental health services: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.参与围产期心理健康服务:一项横断面问卷调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 May 14;19(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2320-9.
9
The 1918 Influenza Pandemic and Subsequent Health Outcomes: An Analysis of SIPP Data.1918年流感大流行及其后续健康结果:基于收入和项目参与调查(SIPP)数据的分析
Am Econ Rev. 2005 May;95(2):258-62. doi: 10.1257/000282805774669943.
10
'Women and babies are dying but not of Ebola': the effect of the Ebola virus epidemic on the availability, uptake and outcomes of maternal and newborn health services in Sierra Leone.“妇女和婴儿正在死亡,但并非死于埃博拉”:埃博拉病毒疫情对塞拉利昂孕产妇和新生儿保健服务的可及性、利用率及结果的影响
BMJ Glob Health. 2016 Oct 7;1(3):e000065. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000065. eCollection 2016.