Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute, Milan, Italy.
Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Milan University, Milan, Italy.
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2020 Sep;25(3):238-246. doi: 10.1111/jns.12396. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
To evaluate the utility of different outcome measures to monitor dose adjustment of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy in patients with chronic inflammatory neuropathy (CIN). We assessed the adjustment of IVIg maintenance therapy in 20 patients (10 CIDP and 10 MMN) by regularly monitoring grip strength (GS) using a Martin Vigorimeter, RODS, and quality of life using the SF-36 questionnaire. These measures were regularly performed by the patient at home. We also assessed the extended MRC sumscore (eMRC sumscore) at each outpatient visit for IVIg infusion. We also enrolled 30 healthy controls to measure any possible training effect of GS with time and to analyze random fluctuation of GS. Clinically relevant change was detected by eMRC sumscore in 14 (93%) patients, by RODS in 11 (73%) patients, and by GS in 8 (53%) patients. Early sensitivity was greatest for RODS (73%), followed by GS (53%), and eMRC sumscore (27%). This differed from CIDP, with an early change in RODS in 100% of patients, and MMN with an early change in GS in 75%. None of the outcome measures alone was sufficient to detect clinically significant changes in all patients. Home monitoring of outcome measures objectively assisted clinical decision during individualization of IVIg treatment. We recommend a multimodal approach using different outcome measures to monitor the individual patient with CIN.
为了评估不同的结局指标在监测慢性炎症性神经病(CIN)患者静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg)治疗剂量调整中的作用。我们通过定期使用 Martin 握力计、RODS 和 SF-36 问卷评估生活质量来评估 20 例患者(10 例 CIDP 和 10 例 MMN)中 IVIg 维持治疗的调整。这些措施由患者在家中定期进行。我们还在每次门诊 IVIg 输注时评估扩展 MRC 总和评分(eMRC 总和评分)。我们还招募了 30 名健康对照者,以测量 GS 随时间的任何可能的训练效果,并分析 GS 的随机波动。通过 eMRC 总和评分在 14 名(93%)患者中、RODS 在 11 名(73%)患者中、GS 在 8 名(53%)患者中检测到临床相关变化。RODS 的早期敏感性最高(73%),其次是 GS(53%)和 eMRC 总和评分(27%)。这与 CIDP 不同,RODS 在 100%的患者中早期变化,MMN 在 GS 中早期变化 75%。没有任何单一的结局指标足以在所有患者中检测到临床显著变化。结局指标的家庭监测客观地协助了个体化 IVIg 治疗中的临床决策。我们建议采用多模态方法,使用不同的结局指标来监测 CIN 患者。