The Knee, Hip and Shoulder Center, Portsmouth, NH, USA.
Exactech Inc., Gainesville, FL, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Oct;29(10):2080-2088. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.02.023. Epub 2020 May 26.
Preoperative planning software is gaining utility in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), particularly when addressing pathologic glenoid wear. The purpose of this study was to quantify inter- and intrasurgeon variability in preoperative planning a series of RTSA cases to identify differences in how surgeons consider optimal implant placement. This may help identify opportunities to establish consensus when correlating plan differences with clinical data.
A total of 49 computed tomography scans from actual RTSA cases were planned for RTSA by 9 fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons using the same platform (Exactech GPS, Exactech Inc., Gainesville, FL, USA). Each case was planned a second time 6-12 weeks later. Variability within and between surgeons was measured for implant selection, version correction, inclination correction, and implant face position. Interclass correlation coefficients, and Pearson and Light's kappa coefficient were used for statistical analysis.
There was considerable variation in the frequency of augmented baseplate selection between surgeons and between rounds for the same surgeon. Thresholds for augment use also varied between surgeons. Interclass correlation coefficients for intersurgeon variability ranged from 0.43 for version, 0.42 for inclination, and 0.25 for baseplate type. Pearson coefficients for intrasurgeon variability were 0.34 for version and 0.30 for inclination. Light's kappa coefficient for baseplate type was 0.61.
This study demonstrates substantial variability both between surgeons and between rounds for individual surgeons when planning RTSA. Although average differences between plans were relatively small, there were large differences in specific cases suggesting little consensus on optimal planning parameters and opportunities to establish guidelines based on glenoid pathoanatomy. The correlation of preoperative planning with clinical outcomes will help to establish such guidelines.
术前规划软件在反式全肩关节置换术(RTSA)中越来越实用,尤其是在处理病理性肩盂磨损时。本研究的目的是量化一系列 RTSA 病例术前规划中术者间和术者内的变异性,以确定术者考虑最佳植入物放置的方式的差异。这有助于在将计划差异与临床数据相关联时确定建立共识的机会。
使用相同平台(Exactech GPS,Exactech Inc.,佛罗里达州盖恩斯维尔),由 9 名经过 fellowship 培训的肩部外科医生对 49 例实际 RTSA 病例的 CT 扫描进行了 RTSA 术前规划。每个病例在 6-12 周后进行第二次规划。测量了植入物选择、版本校正、倾斜校正和植入物面位置的术者内和术者间的变异性。使用组内相关系数、Pearson 系数和 Light's kappa 系数进行统计学分析。
术者间和同一术者两轮之间在增强型基板选择的频率上存在很大差异。使用增强物的阈值也在术者之间有所不同。术者间变异性的组内相关系数范围为 0.43(版本)、0.42(倾斜)和 0.25(基板类型)。术者内变异性的 Pearson 系数为 0.34(版本)和 0.30(倾斜)。基板类型的 Light's kappa 系数为 0.61。
本研究表明,在规划 RTSA 时,术者间和单个术者两轮之间存在大量变异性。尽管计划之间的平均差异相对较小,但在特定病例中存在较大差异,这表明在最佳规划参数方面几乎没有共识,并为基于肩盂病理解剖的制定指南提供了机会。术前规划与临床结果的相关性将有助于建立这些指南。