Department of Health and Exercise Science, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina (Dr Bouldin); Department of Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio (Dr Swan); Speech-Language Pathology Program, School of Health Professions, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (Dr Norman); George E. Whalen VA Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah (Dr Tate); Departments of Neurology (Dr Tate) and Internal Medicine (Dr Pugh), University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City; Lees-McRae College, Banner Elk, North Carolina (Ms Tumminello); VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah (Mss Amuan and Trevino and Dr Pugh); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, and Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California (Dr Eapen); and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (Dr Wang).
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2021;36(1):10-19. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000574.
To evaluate whether neurobehavioral symptoms differ between groups of veterans with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) classified by health characteristics.
A total of 71 934 post-9/11 veterans with mTBI from the Chronic Effects of Neurotrauma Consortium Epidemiology warfighter cohort.
Cross-sectional analysis of retrospective cohort.
Health phenotypes identified using latent class analysis of health and function over 5 years. Symptom severity measured using Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory; domains included vestibular, somatic, cognitive, and affective.
Veterans classified as moderately healthy had the lowest symptom burden while the polytrauma phenotype group had the highest. After accounting for sociodemographic and injury characteristics, polytrauma phenotype veterans had about 3 times the odds of reporting severe symptoms in each domain compared with moderately healthy veterans. Those veterans who were initially moderately healthy but whose health declined over time had about twice the odds of severe symptoms as consistently healthier Veterans. The strongest associations were in the affective domain. Compared with the moderately healthy group, veterans in other phenotypes were more likely to report symptoms substantially interfered with their daily lives (odds ratio range: 1.3-2.8).
Symptom severity and interference varied by phenotype, including between veterans with stable and declining health. Ameliorating severe symptoms, particularly in the affective domain, could improve health trajectories following mTBI.
评估根据健康特征分类的轻度创伤性脑损伤 (mTBI) 退伍军人群体之间的神经行为症状是否存在差异。
来自慢性神经创伤后果联盟流行病学作战人员队列的共 71934 名 9/11 后患有 mTBI 的退伍军人。
回顾性队列的横断面分析。
使用健康和功能的潜在类别分析在 5 年内确定健康表型。使用神经行为症状量表测量症状严重程度;包括前庭、躯体、认知和情感领域。
被归类为健康状况中等的退伍军人的症状负担最低,而多发伤表型组的症状负担最高。在考虑社会人口统计学和损伤特征后,与健康状况中等的退伍军人相比,多发伤表型退伍军人在每个领域报告严重症状的可能性约高出 3 倍。那些最初健康状况中等但随着时间的推移健康状况下降的退伍军人与持续健康的退伍军人相比,严重症状的可能性约增加了两倍。最强的关联存在于情感领域。与健康状况中等的退伍军人相比,其他表型的退伍军人报告症状严重程度更有可能对他们的日常生活造成严重干扰(比值比范围:1.3-2.8)。
表型不同,症状严重程度和干扰程度也不同,包括健康稳定和健康状况下降的退伍军人。改善严重症状,特别是在情感领域,可能会改善 mTBI 后的健康轨迹。