Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Computer Assisted Surgery Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, Netherlands.
Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun;102-B(6):727-735. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B6.BJJ-2019-1429.R1.
It remains controversial whether patellofemoral joint pathology is a contraindication to lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of preoperative radiological degenerative changes and alignment on patient-reported outcome scores (PROMs) after lateral UKA. Secondarily, the influence of lateral UKA on the alignment of the patellofemoral joint was studied.
A consecutive series of patients who underwent robotic arm-assisted fixed-bearing lateral UKA with at least two-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Radiological evaluation was conducted to obtain a Kellgren Lawrence (KL) grade, an Altman score, and alignment measurements for each knee. Postoperative PROMs were assessed using the Kujala (Anterior Knee Pain Scale) score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and satisfaction levels.
A total of 140 knees (130 patients) were identified for analysis. At mean 4.1 years (2.0 to 8.5) follow-up, good to excellent Kujala scores were reported. The presence of mild to moderate preoperative patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis had no impact on these scores (KL grade 0 vs 1 to 3, p = 0.203; grade 0 to 1 vs 2 to 3, p = 0.674). Comparable scores were reported by patients with osteoarthritis (Altman score of ≥ 2) evident on either the medial or lateral patellofemoral joint facet (medial, p = 0.600 and lateral, p = 0.950). Patients with abnormal patellar congruence and tilt angles (≥ 17° and ≥ 14°, respectively) reported good to excellent Kujala scores. Furthermore, lateral UKA resulted in improvements to patellofemoral alignment.
This is the first study demonstrating that mild to moderate preoperative radiological degenerative changes and malalignment of the patellofemoral joint are not associated with poor patient-reported outcomes at mid-term follow-up after lateral fixed-bearing UKA. Our data suggest that this may be explained by realignment of the patella and thereby redistribution of loads across the patellofemoral joint. Cite this article: 2020;102-B(6):727-735.
髌股关节病理学是否是外侧单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)的禁忌症仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估术前放射学退行性改变和对线对外侧 UKA 后患者报告的结果评分(PROMs)的影响。其次,研究外侧 UKA 对髌股关节对线的影响。
回顾性分析了连续接受机器人辅助固定轴承外侧 UKA 治疗且至少随访 2 年的患者系列。对每例膝关节进行放射学评估以获得 Kellgren-Lawrence(KL)分级、Altman 评分和对线测量值。使用 Kujala(前膝痛量表)评分、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分关节置换(KOOS-JR)和满意度水平评估术后 PROMs。
共分析了 140 个膝关节(130 例患者)。在平均 4.1 年(2.0 至 8.5)的随访中,报告了良好至优秀的 Kujala 评分。轻度至中度术前髌股关节骨关节炎的存在对这些评分没有影响(KL 分级 0 与 1 至 3,p = 0.203;分级 0 至 1 与 2 至 3,p = 0.674)。内侧或外侧髌股关节面出现骨关节炎(Altman 评分≥2)的患者报告了相似的评分(内侧,p = 0.600;外侧,p = 0.950)。髌骨吻合不良和倾斜角(分别≥17°和≥14°)的患者报告了良好至优秀的 Kujala 评分。此外,外侧 UKA 改善了髌股关节对线。
这是第一项研究表明,外侧固定轴承 UKA 后中期随访时,轻度至中度术前放射学退行性改变和髌股关节对线不良与患者报告的结果不佳无关。我们的数据表明,这可能是由于髌骨的重新对线,从而导致髌股关节负荷的重新分布。
2020;102-B(6):727-735.