Department of Psychiatry, Dokuz Eylul University Medical School, Izmir35340, Turkey.
Department of Neuroscience, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir35340, Turkey.
Psychol Med. 2020 Jun;50(8):1257-1266. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720001634. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been associated with cognitive deficits, particularly with executive functions. These findings support fronto-striatal dysfunction in OCD. However, it is not certain whether these findings are trait features of OCD. In recent years, a number of studies have investigated cognitive functions in unaffected relatives of OCD (OCDrel) but the findings of these studies are contradictory.
A systematic review in Pubmed and Scopus databases was performed until 18 March 2019, to locate the studies comparing cognitive functions of OCDrel with healthy controls and OCD patients (OCDpt). A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted.
Current meta-analysis included 16 studies including 527 OCDrel, 445 OCDpt and 639 healthy controls. Healthy controls overperformed OCDpt in all cognitive domains (d = 0.36-0.86). OCDrel underperformed healthy controls in inhibition (d = 0.58, CI = 0.29-0.86), planning (d = 0.45, CI = 0.28-0.63), decision-making (d = 0.58, CI = 0.19-0.98). OCDrel also had small-sized deficits in set-shifting (d = 0.37, CI = 0.04-0.69) and visual memory (d = 0.28, CI = 0.08-0.49). OCDpt underperformed OCDrel in visual memory (d = 0.45, CI = 0.22-0.67) and set-shifting (d = 0.23, CI = 0.04-0.42).
Current findings suggest that abnormalities in inhibition, planning/problem solving and reward-based decision-making are shared features of OCDrel and OCDpt and might be trait markers related to vulnerability for developing OCD. Visual memory and set-shifting deficits might potentially be biomarkers of incipient illness or subthreshold OCD presentation among OCDrel. Further exploration of cognitive heterogeneity in OCDrel and investigating the effects of the subtypes of OCD in probands on cognitive impairment in OCDrel are needed.
强迫症(OCD)与认知缺陷有关,特别是与执行功能有关。这些发现支持 OCD 中额纹状体功能障碍。然而,这些发现是否是 OCD 的特征尚不确定。近年来,许多研究调查了 OCD 未受影响亲属(OCDrel)的认知功能,但这些研究的结果存在矛盾。
在 Pubmed 和 Scopus 数据库中进行了系统综述,截至 2019 年 3 月 18 日,以定位比较 OCDrel 与健康对照和强迫症患者(OCDpt)认知功能的研究。进行了随机效应荟萃分析。
当前的荟萃分析包括 16 项研究,共纳入 527 名 OCDrel、445 名 OCDpt 和 639 名健康对照。健康对照组在所有认知领域的表现均优于 OCDpt(d = 0.36-0.86)。OCDrel 在抑制(d = 0.58,CI = 0.29-0.86)、计划(d = 0.45,CI = 0.28-0.63)、决策(d = 0.58,CI = 0.19-0.98)方面表现较差。OCDrel 在转换(d = 0.37,CI = 0.04-0.69)和视觉记忆(d = 0.28,CI = 0.08-0.49)方面也存在较小的缺陷。OCDpt 在视觉记忆(d = 0.45,CI = 0.22-0.67)和转换(d = 0.23,CI = 0.04-0.42)方面的表现也逊于 OCDrel。
目前的研究结果表明,抑制、计划/解决问题和基于奖励的决策异常是 OCDrel 和 OCDpt 的共同特征,可能是与 OCD 易感性相关的特征标志物。视觉记忆和转换缺陷可能是 OCDrel 疾病早期或阈下 OCD 表现的生物标志物。需要进一步探索 OCDrel 中的认知异质性,并研究先证者中 OCD 的亚型对 OCDrel 认知障碍的影响。